scholarly journals My Team of Care Study: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Communication Tool for Collaborative Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. e219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teja Voruganti ◽  
Eva Grunfeld ◽  
Trevor Jamieson ◽  
Allison M Kurahashi ◽  
Bhadra Lokuge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Communication Tool ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Study

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Web-Based Asthma Self-Management System, My Asthma Portal (MAP): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. e313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ahmed ◽  
Pierre Ernst ◽  
Susan J Bartlett ◽  
Marie-France Valois ◽  
Tasneem Zaihra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Management System ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Pilot randomized controlled trial of a symptom cluster intervention in advanced cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharla M. Wells-Di Gregorio ◽  
Donald R. Marks ◽  
Joseph DeCola ◽  
Juan Peng ◽  
Danielle Probst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Cluster ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Smokefree.gov for Smokers With Bipolar Disorder

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1543-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimee L Heffner ◽  
Megan M Kelly ◽  
Jeanette Waxmonsky ◽  
Kristin Mattocks ◽  
Edit Serfozo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Trial Design ◽  
Nicotine Patch ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Acceptance And Commitment ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Introduction Smokers with bipolar disorder (BD) are less successful at quitting than the general population. In this study, we evaluated in a pilot randomized controlled trial a novel, targeted, web-based intervention for smokers with BD based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and designed for reach and disseminability. Aims and Methods Daily smokers (n = 51) with bipolar I or II disorder were recruited from four US sites and randomly assigned to one of two web-based smoking cessation interventions—ACT-based WebQuit Plus (n = 25) or Smokefree.gov (n = 26) over a 10-week treatment period. All participants received nicotine patch for 8 weeks. Key outcomes were trial design feasibility, intervention acceptability, and cessation at end of treatment and 1-month follow-up. Results We screened 119 to enroll 51 participants (target sample size = 60) over 24 months. The most common reason for ineligibility was the inability to attend study appointments. Retention was 73% at end of treatment and 80% at follow-up, with no differences by arm. The mean number of logins was twice as high for WebQuit Plus (10.3 vs. 5.3). The usefulness of program skills was rated higher for WebQuit Plus (75% vs. 29%). Biochemically confirmed, 7-day abstinence at end of treatment was 12% in WebQuit Plus versus 8% in Smokefree.gov (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 0.21 to 9.97). At follow-up, abstinence rates were 8% in both arms. Conclusions Trial design produced favorable retention rates, although alternative recruitment methods will be needed for a larger trial. At end of treatment, acceptability and estimated effect size of WebQuit Plus relative to Smokefree.gov were promising and support continued program refinement and evaluation. Implications In this first randomized controlled trial of a targeted intervention for smokers with BD, we found that the ACT-based WebQuit Plus intervention, delivered in combination with the nicotine patch, had promising acceptability and cessation outcomes relative to Smokefree.gov. The observed signals for acceptability and cessation suggest that the WebQuit Plus program should be refined based on participant feedback and evaluated in a larger trial. Feasibility findings from this study also provide direction for refining trial procedures to enhance the recruitment of smokers with BD.

scholarly journals Be Healthe for Your Heart: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention to Improve the Cardiovascular Health of Women with a History of Preeclampsia

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 5779
Author(s):  
Melinda J. Hutchesson ◽  
Rachael Taylor ◽  
Vanessa A. Shrewsbury ◽  
Lisa Vincze ◽  
Linda E. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Behaviors ◽  
Behavioral Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Risk Markers ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
History Of ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a web-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention intervention for women following preeclampsia. Australian women with a recent history (≤4 years post diagnosis) of preeclampsia were randomized into two study arms: (1) Be Healthe for your Heart, a web-based behavioral intervention or; (2) Control, access to the National Heart Foundation website. Assessments were conducted at baseline, and after three months. Intervention acceptability and impact on absolute CVD 30-year risk score, CVD risk markers and health behaviors were assessed. Twenty-four of 31 (77.4%) women completed the three-month assessment. Eleven out of 13 intervention participants (84.6%) agreed/strongly agreed they were satisfied with the program, with a mean score of 4.2 ± 0.9 (maximum of five). There were no significant between or within group differences in absolute CVD risk, CVD risk markers or health behaviors from baseline to three months. Women with a history of preeclampsia were successfully recruited and retained and they reported high levels of acceptability with the Be Healthe for your Heart program. Further research is therefore needed from powered trials to determine the impact of web-based lifestyle interventions on CVD risk in this at-risk group.

scholarly journals Meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Breitbart ◽  
Barry Rosenfeld ◽  
Christopher Gibson ◽  
Hayley Pessin ◽  
Shannon Poppito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Psychotherapy ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Lock to Live—An Interactive Web-Based Lethal Means Safety Decision Aid for Suicidal Adults: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/16253 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e16253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian E Betz ◽  
Christopher E Knoepke ◽  
Scott Simpson ◽  
Bonnie J Siry ◽  
Ashley Clement ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Lethal Means ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Counseling to reduce access to lethal means such as firearms and medications is recommended for suicidal adults but does not routinely occur. We developed the Web-based Lock to Live (L2L) decision aid to help suicidal adults and their families choose options for safer home storage. Objective This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of L2L among suicidal adults in emergency departments (EDs). Methods At 4 EDs, we enrolled participants (English-speaking, community-dwelling, suicidal adults) in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized in a 13:7 ratio to L2L or control (website with general suicide prevention information) groups and received a 1-week follow-up telephone call. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the intervention (n=33) and control (n=16) groups. At baseline, many participants reported having access to firearms (33/49, 67%), medications (46/49, 94%), or both (29/49, 59%). Participants viewed L2L for a median of 6 min (IQR 4-10 min). L2L also had very high acceptability; almost all participants reported that they would recommend it to someone in the same situation, that the options felt realistic, and that L2L was respectful of values about firearms. In an exploratory analysis of this pilot trial, more participants in the L2L group reported reduced firearm access at follow-up, although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions The L2L decision aid appears feasible and acceptable for use among adults with suicide risk and may be a useful adjunct to lethal means counseling and other suicide prevention interventions. Future large-scale studies are needed to determine the effect on home access to lethal means. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03478501; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03478501

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document