scholarly journals Improving Pediatric Basic Life Support Performance Through Blended Learning With Web-Based Virtual Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Lehmann ◽  
Christiane Thiessen ◽  
Barbara Frick ◽  
Hans Martin Bosse ◽  
Christoph Nikendei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Virtual Patients ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Innovation Basic Life Support Training Devices to Layperson: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiput Laosuksri ◽  
Boriboon Chenthanakij ◽  
Krongkarn Sutham ◽  
Wetchayan Rangsri ◽  
Radom Pongvuthitham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Median Score ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Practical Examination ◽  
Conventional Device

Objectives: The use of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback device and automated external defibrillator trainer is beneficial in basic life support (BLS) training. Nevertheless, Thailand lacks these devices in BLS support training. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the Chiang Mai BLS training devices with conventional training devices in BLS training for laypeople.Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of the Chiang Mai device group with the conventional device group, by assessing the theory and practical examination scores of the participants; who were adult, laypeople attending the BLS provider course endorsed by the Thai Resuscitation Council. Evaluating instructors were blinded from both groups of participants.Results: A total of 60 adult, laypeople participants were divided into two groups: 32 and 28 participants of the Chiang Mai device group and conventional device group, respectively. Overall examination scores of included participants were very high. The participants in the Chiang Mai device group had a higher median score of multiple-choice question assessment [9.0/9.0 (8.5-9.0) vs 8.5/9.0 (8.0-9.0) points, p-value=0.134] as well as a higher median score of practical examination [26.0/26.0 (24.3-26.0) vs 25.0/26.0 (24.0-26.0) points, p-value=0.278] when compared to those using conventional BLS training devices. However, there was no statistical significance between both groups.Conclusion: The effectiveness of the Chiang Mai BLS training device in basic life support training for adult laypeople is comparable to conventional BLS training devices.

scholarly journals Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: a randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Abbas ◽  
Bisher Sawaf ◽  
Ibrahem Hanafi ◽  
Mohammad Younis Hajeer ◽  
Mhd Ismael Zakaria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

AP086 In-hospital evaluation of basic life support training programs: A randomized controlled trial

Resuscitation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
Naheed Akhtar ◽  
Naheed Akhtar ◽  
Robin Davies ◽  
Michelle Davies ◽  
Natalie Husselbee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Learning by teaching basic life support: a non-randomized controlled trial with medical students

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Geraldo Veloso ◽  
Gabriel Santos Pereira ◽  
Nathália Nascimento Vasconcelos ◽  
Maria Helena Senger ◽  
Rosa Malena Delbone de Faria
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Learning By Teaching ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document