scholarly journals An eHealth Intervention for Promoting COVID-19 Knowledge and Protective Behaviors and Reducing Pandemic Distress among Sexual and Gender Minorities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (#SafeHandsSafeHearts) (Preprint)

10.2196/34381 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Adam Newman ◽  
Venkatesan Chakrapani ◽  
Charmaine Williams ◽  
Notisha Massaquoi ◽  
Suchon Tepjan ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Adam Newman ◽  
Venkatesan Chakrapani ◽  
Charmaine Williams ◽  
Notisha Massaquoi ◽  
Suchon Tepjan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Existing data on COVID-19 disparities among vulnerable populations portend excess risk for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and other persons outside of heteronormative and cisgender identities (i.e., LGBT+). Owing to adverse social determinants of health, including pervasive HIV and sexual stigma, harassment, violence, barriers in access to healthcare, and existing health and mental health disparities, sexual and gender minorities in India and Thailand are at disproportionate risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease. Despite global health disparities among LGBT+ populations, there is a lack of coordinated, community-engaged interventions to address the expectable excess burden of COVID-19 and public health-recommended protective measures. OBJECTIVE We will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief, peer-delivered eHealth intervention to increase COVID-19 knowledge and public health-recommended protective behaviors and reduce psychological distress among LGBT+ people residing in Bangkok, Thailand, and Mumbai, India. Subsequent to the RCT, we will conduct exit interviews with purposively sampled subgroups, including those with no intervention effect. METHODS SafeHandsSafeHearts is a 2-site, parallel waitlist-controlled RCT to test the efficacy of a 3-session, peer counselor-delivered eHealth intervention based on motivational interviewing and psychoeducation. The study methods, online infrastructure and content were pilot tested with LGBT+ individuals in Toronto, Canada before adaptation and roll-out in the other contexts. The primary outcomes are COVID-19 knowledge (index based on U.S. CDC items), protective behaviors (index based on WHO and U.S. CDC guidelines), depression (PHQ-2) and anxiety (GAD-2). Secondary outcomes include loneliness, COVID-19 stress, and intended care-seeking. We will enroll N = 310 participants in each city, age 18 years and older, one-third cisgender gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, one-third cisgender lesbian, bisexual and other women who have sex with women, and one-third transfeminine, transmasculine and gender nonbinary people. Participants will be equally stratified in the immediate intervention and waitlist control group. Participants are mainly recruited from online social media accounts of community-based partner organizations. They can access the intervention on a computer, tablet, or mobile phone. SafeHandsSafeHearts has 3 sessions delivered weekly over three successive weeks. Exit interviews will be conducted online with 3 subgroups (n = 12 per group; N = 36 in each city) of purposively selected participants, to be informed by RCT outcomes and focal populations of concern. RESULTS The RCT was funded in 2020. The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04870723). The trials started recruitment as of August 1, 2021, and all RCT data collection will likely be completed by December 31, 2021. CONCLUSIONS The SafeHandsSafeHearts RCT will provide evidence about the effectiveness of a brief, peer-delivered e-Health intervention developed for LGBT+ populations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. If the intervention proves effective, it will provide a basis for future scale-up in India and Thailand, and other low- and middle-income countries. CLINICALTRIAL NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04870723; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04870723


2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Jared Secher ◽  
Johannes Jakobsen Sidelmann ◽  
Janne Ingerslev ◽  
Jens Jørgen Thorn ◽  
Else Marie Pinholt

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob J van den Berg ◽  
Taylor Silverman ◽  
M Isabel Fernandez ◽  
Kirk D Henny ◽  
Zaneta J Gaul ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Black and Hispanic men who have sex with men in the United States continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS. Uptake of and knowledge about biobehavioral HIV prevention approaches, such as treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis, are especially low in these populations. eHealth campaigns and social media messaging about treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis may help to fill this gap in knowledge and lead to increased uptake of such strategies; however, no evidence exists of the effects of these targeted forms of communication on treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis uptake in these populations. OBJECTIVE We describe the protocol for a 3-part study aiming to develop and evaluate an eHealth intervention with information about treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-positive and HIV-negative black and Hispanic men who have sex with men. METHODS Phases 1 and 2 will involve focus groups and cognitive interviews with members of the target populations, which we will use to create a culturally tailored, interactive website and applicable social media messaging for these men. Phase 3 will be a small randomized controlled trial of the eHealth intervention, in which participants will receive guided social media messages plus the newly developed website (active arm) or the website alone (control arm), with assessments at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS Participant recruitment began in August 2017 and will end in August 2020. CONCLUSIONS Public health interventions are greatly needed to increase knowledge about and uptake of biobehavioral HIV prevention strategies such as treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis among black and Hispanic men who have sex with men. eHealth communication campaigns offer a strategy for engaging these populations in health communication about biobehavioral HIV prevention. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03404531; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03404531 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70myofp0R). REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER RR1-10.2196/11047


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margrethe Røed ◽  
Anine C Medin ◽  
Frøydis N Vik ◽  
Elisabet R Hillesund ◽  
Wendy Van Lippevelde ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND In western countries, children’s diets are often low in fruits and vegetables and high in discretionary foods. Diet in early life tends to track through childhood and youth and even into adulthood. Interventions should, therefore, be delivered in periods when habitual traits are established, as in toddlerhood when children adapt to their family’s diet. OBJECTIVE In this study, we assessed the effect of the Food4toddlers eHealth intervention, which aimed to enhance toddlers’ diets by shaping their food and eating environment. METHODS The Food4toddlers randomized controlled trial was conducted in Norway in 2017-2018. Parent-child dyads were recruited through social media. In total, 298 parents completed an online questionnaire at baseline (mean child age 10.9 months, SD 1.2). Postintervention questionnaires were completed immediately after the intervention (ie, follow-up 1; mean child age 17.8 months, SD 1.3) and 6 months after the intervention (ie, follow-up 2; mean child age 24.2 months, SD 1.9). The intervention was guided by social cognitive theory, which targets the linked relationship between the person, the behavior, and the environment. The intervention group (148/298, 49.7%) got access to the Food4toddlers website for 6 months from baseline. The website included information on diet and on how to create a healthy food and eating environment as well as activities, recipes, and collaboration opportunities. To assess intervention effects on child diet from baseline to follow-up 1 and from baseline to follow-up 2, we used generalized estimating equations and a time × group interaction term. Between-group differences in changes over time for frequency and variety of fruits and vegetables and frequency of discretionary foods were assessed. RESULTS At follow-up 1, a significant time × group interaction was observed for the frequency of vegetable intake (<i>P</i>=.02). The difference between groups in the change from baseline to follow-up 1 was 0.46 vegetable items per day (95% CI 0.06-0.86) in favor of the intervention group. No other significant between-group differences in dietary changes from baseline to follow-up 1 or follow-up 2 were observed. However, there is a clear time trend showing that the intake of discretionary foods increases by time from less than 1 item per week at baseline to more than 4 items per week at 2 years of age (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), regardless of group. CONCLUSIONS A positive intervention effect was observed for the frequency of vegetable intake at follow-up 1 but not at follow-up 2. No other between-group effects on diet were observed. eHealth interventions of longer duration, including reminders after the main content of the intervention has been delivered, may be needed to obtain long-terms effects, along with tailoring in a digital or a personal form. CLINICALTRIAL International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 92980420; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92980420


2019 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 104101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda B. Nickerson ◽  
Jenine Tulledge ◽  
Margaret Manges ◽  
Samantha Kesselring ◽  
Timothy Parks ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document