scholarly journals Intrusiveness and Social Media in Mental Health Research: A Reflection. Comment on "Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis" (Preprint)

10.2196/32475 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Morant ◽  
Natasha Chilman ◽  
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans ◽  
Jane Wackett ◽  
Sonia Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Team Care ◽  
Twitter Users

scholarly journals Mental health crisis resolution teams and crisis care systems in England: a national survey

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans ◽  
Danielle Lamb ◽  
Joseph Barnby ◽  
Michelle Eskinazi ◽  
Amelia Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Mental Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution Teams ◽  
Crisis Care

Aims and methodA national survey investigated the implementation of mental health crisis resolution teams (CRTs) in England. CRTs were mapped and team managers completed an online survey.ResultsNinety-five per cent of mapped CRTs (n = 233) completed the survey. Few CRTs adhered fully to national policy guidelines. CRT implementation and local acute care system contexts varied substantially. Access to CRTs for working-age adults appears to have improved, compared with a similar survey in 2012, despite no evidence of higher staffing levels. Specialist CRTs for children and for older adults with dementia have been implemented in some areas but are uncommon.Clinical implicationsA national mandate and policy guidelines have been insufficient to implement CRTs fully as planned. Programmes to support adherence to the CRT model and CRT service improvement are required. Clearer policy guidance is needed on requirements for crisis care for young people and older adults.Declaration of interestNone.

P02-08 - Mental health crisis resolution and home treatment teams: a qualitative evaluation

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
B. Ferguson ◽  
H. Middleton ◽  
R. Shaw ◽  
R. Collier ◽  
A. Purser
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
Mental Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Health Crisis

scholarly journals Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Chilman ◽  
Nicola Morant ◽  
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans ◽  
Jane Wackett ◽  
Sonia Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Mental Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Rapid Access ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study

BACKGROUND Analyzing Twitter posts enables rapid access to how issues and experiences are socially shared and constructed among communities of health service users and providers, in ways that traditional qualitative methods may not. OBJECTIVE To enrich the understanding of mental health crisis care in the United Kingdom, this study explores views on crisis resolution teams (CRTs) expressed on Twitter. We aim to identify the similarities and differences among views expressed on Twitter compared with interviews and focus groups. METHODS We used Twitter’s advanced search function to retrieve public tweets on CRTs. A thematic analysis was conducted on 500 randomly selected tweets. The principles of refutational synthesis were applied to compare themes with those identified in a multicenter qualitative interview study. RESULTS The most popular hashtag identified was <i>#CrisisTeamFail</i>, where posts were principally related to poor quality of care and access, particularly for people given a <i>personality disorder</i> diagnosis. Posts about CRTs giving unhelpful self-management advice were common, as were tweets about resource strains on mental health services. This was not identified in the research interviews. Although each source yielded unique themes, there were some overlaps with themes identified via interviews and focus groups, including the importance of rapid access to care. Views expressed on Twitter were generally more critical than those obtained via face-to-face methods. CONCLUSIONS Traditional qualitative studies may underrepresent the views of more critical stakeholders by collecting data from participants accessed via mental health services. Research on social media content can complement traditional or face-to-face methods and ensure that a broad spectrum of viewpoints can inform service development and policy. CLINICALTRIAL

scholarly journals What a Bibliometric Study Tells us about Social Media Mental Health Research (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Resnik ◽  
Munmun De Choudhury ◽  
Katherine Musacchio Schafer ◽  
Glen Coppersmith
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Bibliometric Study

UNSTRUCTURED No abstract/not applicable

scholarly journals Acute day units in non-residential settings for people in mental health crisis: the AD-CARE mixed-methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 1-122
Author(s):  
David Osborn ◽  
Danielle Lamb ◽  
Alastair Canaway ◽  
Michael Davidson ◽  
Graziella Favarato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Mental Health Crisis ◽  
Work Package ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Crisis Resolution Teams

Background For people in mental health crisis, acute day units provide daily structured sessions and peer support in non-residential settings as an alternative to crisis resolution teams. Objectives To investigate the provision, effectiveness, intervention acceptability and re-admission rates of acute day units. Design Work package 1 – mapping and national questionnaire survey of acute day units. Work package 2.1 – cohort study comparing outcomes during a 6-month period between acute day unit and crisis resolution team participants. Work package 2.2 – qualitative interviews with staff and service users of acute day units. Work package 3 – a cohort study within the Mental Health Minimum Data Set exploring re-admissions to acute care over 6 months. A patient and public involvement group supported the study throughout. Setting and participants Work package 1 – all non-residential acute day units (NHS and voluntary sector) in England. Work packages 2.1 and 2.2 – four NHS trusts with staff, service users and carers in acute day units and crisis resolution teams. Work package 3 – all individuals using mental health NHS trusts in England. Results Work package 1 – we identified 27 acute day units in 17 out of 58 trusts. Acute day units are typically available on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., providing a wide range of interventions and a multidisciplinary team, including clinicians, and having an average attendance of 5 weeks. Work package 2.1 – we recruited 744 participants (acute day units, n = 431; crisis resolution teams, n = 312). In the primary analysis, 21% of acute day unit participants (vs. 23% of crisis resolution team participants) were re-admitted to acute mental health services over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the fully adjusted model (acute day unit hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.14; p = 0.20), with highly heterogeneous results between trusts. Acute day unit participants had higher satisfaction and well-being scores and lower depression scores than crisis resolution team participants. The health economics analysis found no difference in resource use or cost between the acute day unit and crisis resolution team groups in the fully adjusted analysis. Work package 2.2 – 36 people were interviewed (acute day unit staff, n = 12; service users, n = 21; carers, n = 3). There was an overwhelming consensus that acute day units are highly valued. Service users found the high amount of contact time and staff continuity, peer support and structure provided by acute day units particularly beneficial. Staff also valued providing continuity, building strong therapeutic relationships and providing a variety of flexible, personalised support. Work package 3 – of 231,998 individuals discharged from acute care (crisis resolution team, acute day unit or inpatient ward), 21.4% were re-admitted for acute treatment within 6 months, with women, single people, people of mixed or black ethnicity, those living in more deprived areas and those in the severe psychosis care cluster being more likely to be re-admitted. Little variation in re-admissions was explained at the trust level, or between trusts with and trusts without acute day units (adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.15). Limitations In work package 1, some of the information is likely to be incomplete as a result of trusts’ self-reporting. There may have been recruitment bias in work packages 2.1 and 2.2. Part of the health economics analysis relied on clinical Health of the Nations Outcome Scale ratings. The Mental Health Minimum Data Set did not contain a variable identifying acute day units, and some covariates had a considerable number of missing data. Conclusions Acute day units are not provided routinely in the NHS but are highly valued by staff and service users, giving better outcomes in terms of satisfaction, well-being and depression than, and no significant differences in risk of re-admission or increased costs from, crisis resolution teams. Future work should investigate wider health and care system structures and the place of acute day units within them; the development of a model of best practice for acute day units; and staff turnover and well-being (including the impacts of these on care). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

scholarly journals Attitudes towards mental health, mental health research and digital interventions by young adults with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Clarke ◽  
Judy Proudfoot ◽  
Veronica Vatiliotis ◽  
Charles Verge ◽  
Deborah J. Holmes-Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Digital Interventions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document