scholarly journals Prostate cancer risk calculators for healthy population: A systematic review (Preprint)

JMIR Cancer ◽  
10.2196/30430 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Bandala-Jacques ◽  
Kevin Daniel Castellanos Esquivel ◽  
Fernanda Pérez-Hurtado ◽  
Cristobal Hernández-Silva ◽  
Nancy Reynoso-Noverón
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Healthy Population

Prostate cancer risk calculators for healthy population: A systematic review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Bandala-Jacques ◽  
Kevin Daniel Castellanos Esquivel ◽  
Fernanda Pérez-Hurtado ◽  
Cristobal Hernández-Silva ◽  
Nancy Reynoso-Noverón
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Screening for prostate cancer has long been a debated, complex topic. The use of risk calculators for prostate cancer is recommended for determining patients’ individual risk of cancer and the subsequent need for a prostate biopsy. These tools could lead to a better discrimination of patients in need of invasive diagnostic procedures and for optimized allocation of healthcare resources OBJECTIVE To systematically review available literature on current prostate cancer risk calculators’ performance in healthy population, by comparing the impact factor of individual items on different cohorts, and the models’ overall performance. METHODS We performed a systematic review of available prostate cancer risk calculators targeted at healthy population. We included studies published from January 2000 to March 2021 in English, Spanish, French, Portuguese or German. Two reviewers independently decided for or against inclusion based on abstracts. A third reviewer intervened in case of disagreements. From the selected titles, we extracted information regarding the purpose of the manuscript, the analyzed calculators, the population for which it was calibrated, the included risk factors, and the model’s overall accuracy. RESULTS We included a total of 18 calculators across 53 different manuscripts. The most commonly analyzed ones were they PCPT and ERSPC risk calculators, developed from North American and European cohorts, respectively. Both calculators provided high precision for the diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer (AUC as high as 0.798 for PCPT and 0.91 for ERSPC). We found 9 calculators developed from scratch for specific populations, which reached diagnostic precisions as high as 0.938. The most commonly included risk factors in the calculators were age, PSA levels and digital rectal examination findings. Additional calculators included race and detailed personal and family history CONCLUSIONS Both the PCPR and the ERSPC risk calculators have been successfully adapted for cohorts other than the ones they were originally created for with no loss of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, designing calculators from scratch considering each population’s sociocultural differences has resulted in risk tools that can be well adapted to be valid in more patients. The best risk calculator for prostate cancer will be that which was has been calibrated for its intended population and can be easily reproduced and implemented CLINICALTRIAL CRD42021242110

scholarly journals First-degree family history of breast cancer is associated with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Ju Ren ◽  
De-Hong Cao ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Peng-Wei Ren ◽  
Liang-Ren Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Family History ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Effect of statins type on incident prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Yang ◽  
Qiang Wei ◽  
Ping Tan ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
Shi-You Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk

scholarly journals A Western Dietary Pattern Increases Prostate Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Fabiani ◽  
Liliana Minelli ◽  
Gaia Bertarelli ◽  
Silvia Bacci
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Dietary Pattern ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Western Dietary Pattern

Associations of circulating and dietary vitamin D with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Gilbert ◽  
Richard M. Martin ◽  
Rebecca Beynon ◽  
Ross Harris ◽  
Jelena Savovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Dietary Vitamin ◽  
Dietary Vitamin D

scholarly journals Association between COX-2 rs2745557 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongtuan Zhang ◽  
Yong Xu ◽  
Zhihong Zhang ◽  
Ranlu Liu ◽  
Baojie Ma
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Cox 2

The Interleukin-6 –174G/C Polymorphism and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongtuan Zhang ◽  
Yong Xu ◽  
Liang Li ◽  
Ranlu Liu ◽  
Baojie Ma
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document