scholarly journals Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Readability and Quality Assessment (Preprint)

JMIR Diabetes ◽  
10.2196/27221 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Michael Lee ◽  
Elysia Grose ◽  
Karen Cross
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Patient education for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-107b ◽  
Author(s):  
M Annersten Gershater ◽  
E Pilhammar ◽  
J Apelqvist ◽  
C Alm-Roijer
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers

scholarly journals Evaluation of two therapeutic patient education programs for prevention of diabetic foot ulcers

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 10201
Author(s):  
Claire Marchand ◽  
Aurore Margat ◽  
Carole Deccache ◽  
Georges Ha Van ◽  
Jocelyne M’Bemba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Therapeutic Patient Education ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of two education programs on patients’ understanding of the disease, self-efficacy, locus of control, and application of prevention behaviors for foot ulcer. Methods: In four centers that manage patients with diabetes and grade 2 or 3 neuropathy, the first arm of patients (G1 = 53) participated in a “standard” program usually managed in each center, and those in the second arm (G2 = 56) in a “new” program. The patients completed four questionnaires at inclusion (T0) and six months after the education (T1). Occurrence of a new foot ulcer and care behaviors were collected at T1. Z-test was used to compare mean scores for each questionnaire and Fisher’s exact test for percentages (p = 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between groups G1 and G2 in terms of scores for each questionnaire at T0 and T1. Group G2 showed a significant change in score between T0 and T1 for understanding the disease (p = 0.04) and prevention behaviors (p = 0.01). For the sample as a whole (n = 109), there was a significant improvement between T0 and T1 for two questionnaires: understanding of disease (p < 0.01) and declared prevention behaviors (p < 0.01). Patients who reported having relative to participate in care had a significantly higher mean score on prevention behaviors (p < 0.01). Twenty patients had developed one new ulcer since the education (20.2%). Conclusion: This study reinforces the importance of devoting time during education to patients’ understanding of the disease and involving relatives to improve foot ulcer prevention behaviors.

Readability and Quality Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Michael Lee ◽  
Elysia Grose ◽  
Karen Cross
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Online Patient Education

BACKGROUND While diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes, little is known about the content and readability of online patient education materials for diabetic foot ulcers. The recommended reading grade level for these materials is grade 6th - 8th. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality and readability of online patient education materials on diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS A Google search was performed using four different search terms related to DFUs. Six different tools were used to assess the readability of included patient education materials. These included the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch-Reading Ease Score, Gunning-Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index. The DISCERN tool was used to assess quality and reliability RESULTS Fourty-one online patient education materials were included. The average Flesch-Reading Ease score for all patient education materials was 63.43±14.21, indicating a standard difficulty level of reading. The average reading grade level was 9.33±2.6, which is higher than the recommended reading level for patient education materials. The mean DISCERN score was 45.66±3.34 and 27% (11/41) of articles had DISCERN scores less than 39, corresponding to poor or very poor quality. CONCLUSIONS The majority of online patient education materials on diabetic foot ulcers are written above the recommended reading levels and have significant deficiencies in terms of their quality and reliability. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the shortcomings of these resources and consider the impact they may have on patients’ self-management.

scholarly journals Quality assessment of tissue specimens for studies of diabetic foot ulcers

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivera Stojadinovic ◽  
Jennifer N. Landon ◽  
Katherine A. Gordon ◽  
Irena Pastar ◽  
Julia Escandon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Tissue Specimens

Abstract #295 Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Diabetic Foot Ulcers – Report From South West Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 121-122
Author(s):  
Olufunmilayo Adeleye ◽  
Ejiofor Ugwu ◽  
Anthonia Ogbera ◽  
Akinola Dada ◽  
Ibrahim Gezawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
South West
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document