scholarly journals The challenge of integrating eHealth into healthcare: a systematic literature review on structure, process and outcome (Donabedian model) (Preprint)

10.2196/27180 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosian Tossaint - Schoenmakers ◽  
Anke Versluis ◽  
Niels Chavannes ◽  
Esther Talboom - Kamp ◽  
Marise Kasteleyn
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Process And Outcome ◽  
Donabedian Model

Are we measuring what matters in health technology assessment of disease management? Systematic literature review

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Steuten ◽  
Bert Vrijhoef ◽  
Hans Severens ◽  
Frits van Merode ◽  
Cor Spreeuwenberg
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Substantial Part ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Process And Outcome ◽  
Process And Outcome Indicators

Objectives:An overview was produced of indicators currently used to assess disease management programs and, based on these findings, provide a framework regarding sets of indicators that should be used when taking the aims and types of disease management programs into account.Methods:A systematic literature review was performed.Results:Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. It appeared that a link between aims of disease management and evaluated structure, process, as well as outcome indicators does not exist in a substantial part of published studies on disease management of diabetes and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, especially when efficiency of care is concerned. Furthermore, structure indicators are largely missing from the evaluations, although these are of major importance for the interpretation of outcomes for purposes of decision-making. Efficiency of disease management is mainly evaluated by means ofprocessindicators; the use ofoutcomeindicators is less common. Within a framework, structure, process, and outcome indicators for effectiveness and efficiency are recommended for each type of disease management program.Conclusions:The link between aims of disease management and evaluated structure, process, and outcome indicators does not exist in a substantial part of published studies on disease management. The added value of this study mainly lies in the development of a framework to guide the choice of indicators for health technology assessment of disease management.

scholarly journals Quality indicators for in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes: a systematic literature review and international Delphi study

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastiaan Van Grootven ◽  
Lynn McNicoll ◽  
Daniel A Mendelson ◽  
Susan M Friedman ◽  
Katleen Fagard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Process And Outcome ◽  
Stay Time ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Level Of Agreement ◽  
Process And Outcome Indicators

ObjectiveTo find consensus on appropriate and feasible structure, process and outcome indicators for the evaluation of in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes.DesignAn international two-round Delphi study based on a systematic literature review (searching databases, reference lists, prospective citations and trial registers).SettingWestern Europe and the USA.ParticipantsThirty-three people with at least 2 years of clinical experience in geriatric co-management were recruited. Twenty-eight experts (16 from the USA and 12 from Europe) participated in both Delphi rounds (85% response rate).MeasuresParticipants rated the indicators on a nine-point scale for their (1) appropriateness and (2) feasibility to use the indicator for the evaluation of geriatric co-management programmes. Indicators were considered appropriate and feasible based on a median score of seven or higher. Consensus was based on the level of agreement using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.ResultsIn the first round containing 37 indicators, there was consensus on 14 indicators. In the second round containing 44 indicators, there was consensus on 31 indicators (structure=8, process=7, outcome=16). Experts indicated that co-management should start within 24 hours of hospital admission using defined criteria for selecting appropriate patients. Programmes should focus on the prevention and management of geriatric syndromes and complications. Key areas for comprehensive geriatric assessment included cognition/delirium, functionality/mobility, falls, pain, medication and pressure ulcers. Key outcomes for evaluating the programme included length of stay, time to surgery and the incidence of complications.ConclusionThe indicators can be used to assess the performance of geriatric co-management programmes and identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the indicators can be used to monitor the implementation and effect of these programmes.

Measuring Creativity in College Students: A Systematic Literature Review (2003-2012)

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather T. Snyder ◽  
Maggie R. Boyle ◽  
Lacey Gosnell ◽  
Julia A. Hammond ◽  
Haley Huey
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review

Recommendations for male-friendly individual counseling with men: A qualitative systematic literature review for the period 1995–2016.

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Beel ◽  
Carla Jeffries ◽  
Charlotte Brownlow ◽  
Sonya Winterbotham ◽  
Jan du Preez
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Individual Counseling

Mental health care for rural veterans: A systematic literature review, descriptive analysis, and future directions.

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Bumgarner ◽  
Elizabeth J. Polinsky ◽  
Katharine G. Herman ◽  
Joanne M. Fordiani ◽  
Carmen P. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Future Directions

Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense mental health apps: A systematic literature review.

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Gould ◽  
Brian C. Kok ◽  
Vanessa K. Ma ◽  
Aimee Marie L. Zapata ◽  
Jason E. Owen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Health Apps
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document