scholarly journals Development and Validation of Risk Scores for All-Cause Mortality for a Smartphone-Based “General Health Score” App: Prospective Cohort Study Using the UK Biobank

10.2196/25655 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e25655
Author(s):  
Ashley K Clift ◽  
Erwann Le Lannou ◽  
Christian P Tighe ◽  
Sachin S Shah ◽  
Matthew Beatty ◽  
...  

Background Given the established links between an individual’s behaviors and lifestyle factors and potentially adverse health outcomes, univariate or simple multivariate health metrics and scores have been developed to quantify general health at a given point in time and estimate risk of negative future outcomes. However, these health metrics may be challenging for widespread use and are unlikely to be successful at capturing the broader determinants of health in the general population. Hence, there is a need for a multidimensional yet widely employable and accessible way to obtain a comprehensive health metric. Objective The objective of the study was to develop and validate a novel, easily interpretable, points-based health score (“C-Score”) derived from metrics measurable using smartphone components and iterations thereof that utilize statistical modeling and machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods A literature review was conducted to identify relevant predictor variables for inclusion in the first iteration of a points-based model. This was followed by a prospective cohort study in a UK Biobank population for the purposes of validating the C-Score and developing and comparatively validating variations of the score using statistical and ML models to assess the balance between expediency and ease of interpretability and model complexity. Primary and secondary outcome measures were discrimination of a points-based score for all-cause mortality within 10 years (Harrell c-statistic) and discrimination and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models and ML models that incorporate C-Score values (or raw data inputs) and other predictors to predict the risk of all-cause mortality within 10 years. Results The study cohort comprised 420,560 individuals. During a cohort follow-up of 4,526,452 person-years, there were 16,188 deaths from any cause (3.85%). The points-based model had good discrimination (c-statistic=0.66). There was a 31% relative reduction in risk of all-cause mortality per decile of increasing C-Score (hazard ratio of 0.69, 95% CI 0.663-0.675). A Cox model integrating age and C-Score had improved discrimination (8 percentage points; c-statistic=0.74) and good calibration. ML approaches did not offer improved discrimination over statistical modeling. Conclusions The novel health metric (“C-Score”) has good predictive capabilities for all-cause mortality within 10 years. Embedding the C-Score within a smartphone app may represent a useful tool for democratized, individualized health risk prediction. A simple Cox model using C-Score and age balances parsimony and accuracy of risk predictions and could be used to produce absolute risk estimations for app users.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley K. Clift ◽  
Erwann Le Lannou ◽  
Arsi Hyvärinen ◽  
Sachin S. Shah ◽  
Devin D. Dunn ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Even though established links exist between individuals behaviours and potentially adverse health outcomes, to date either univariate, simpler models or multivariate, yet difficult to employ ones, have been developed. Such models are unlikely to be successful at capturing the wider determinants of health in the broader population. Hence, there is a need for a multidimensional, yet widely employable and accessible, way to obtain a comprehensive health metric. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a novel, easily interpretable points-based health score ("C-Score") derived from metrics measurable using smartphone components, and iterations thereof that utilise statistical modelling and machine learning approaches. METHODS Comprehensive literature review to identify suitable predictor variables for inclusion in a first iteration points-based model. This was followed by a prospective cohort study in a UK Biobank population for the purposes of validating the C-Score, and developing and comparatively validating variations of the score using statistical/machine learning models to assess the balance between expediency and ease of interpretability versus model complexity. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Discrimination of a points-based score for all-cause mortality within 10 years (Harrell’s c-statistic). Discrimination and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models and machine learning models that incorporate C-Score values (or raw data inputs) and other predictors to predict risk of all-cause mortality within 10 years. RESULTS The cohort comprised 420,560 individuals. During a cohort follow-up of 4,526,452 person-years, there were 16,188 deaths from any cause (3.85%). The points-based model had good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.66). There was a 31% relative reduction in risk of all-cause mortality per decile of increasing C-Score (hazard ratio: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.663 to 0.675). A Cox model integrating age and C-Score had improved discrimination (8% percentage points, c-statistic = 0.74) and good calibration. Machine learning approaches did not offer improved discrimination over statistical modelling. CONCLUSIONS The novel health metric (‘C-Score’) has good predictive capabilities for all-cause mortality within 10 years. Embedding C-Score within a smartphone application may represent a useful tool for democratised, individualised health risk prediction. A simple Cox model using C-Score and age optimally balances parsimony and accuracy of risk predictions and could be used to produce absolute risk estimations for application users.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley K. Clift ◽  
Erwann Le Lannou ◽  
Christian P. Tighe ◽  
Sachin S. Shah ◽  
Matthew Beatty ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundEven though established links exist between individuals behaviours and potentially adverse health outcomes, to date either univariate, simpler models or multivariate, yet difficult to employ ones, have been developed. Such models are unlikely to be successful at capturing the wider determinants of health in the broader population. Hence, there is a need for a multidimensional, yet widely employable and accessible, way to obtain a comprehensive health metric.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a novel, easily interpretable points-based health score (“C-Score”) derived from metrics measurable using smartphone components, and iterations thereof that utilise statistical modelling and machine learning approaches.MethodsComprehensive literature review to identify suitable predictor variables for inclusion in a first iteration points-based model. This was followed by a prospective cohort study in a UK Biobank population for the purposes of validating the C-Score, and developing and comparatively validating variations of the score using statistical/machine learning models to assess the balance between expediency and ease of interpretability versus model complexity. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Discrimination of a points-based score for all-cause mortality within 10 years (Harrell’s c-statistic). Discrimination and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models and machine learning models that incorporate C-Score values (or raw data inputs) and other predictors to predict risk of all-cause mortality within 10 years.ResultsThe cohort comprised 420,560 individuals. During a cohort follow-up of 4,526,452 person-years, there were 16,188 deaths from any cause (3.85%). The points-based model had good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.66). There was a 31% relative reduction in risk of all-cause mortality per decile of increasing C-Score (hazard ratio: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.663 to 0.675). A Cox model integrating age and C-Score had improved discrimination (8% percentage points, c-statistic = 0.74) and good calibration. Machine learning approaches did not offer improved discrimination over statistical modelling.ConclusionsThe novel health metric (‘C-Score’) has good predictive capabilities for all-cause mortality within 10 years. Embedding C-Score within a smartphone application may represent a useful tool for democratised, individualised health risk prediction. A simple Cox model using C-Score and age optimally balances parsimony and accuracy of risk predictions and could be used to produce absolute risk estimations for application users.


2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Köhler ◽  
Frans Verhey ◽  
Siegfried Weyerer ◽  
Birgitt Wiese ◽  
Kathrin Heser ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 940-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard J. Linden ◽  
Katie Linden ◽  
John Yarnell ◽  
Alun Evans ◽  
Frank Kee ◽  
...  

Diabetologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyi Zhou ◽  
John Macpherson ◽  
Stuart R. Gray ◽  
Jason M. R. Gill ◽  
Paul Welsh ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims/hypothesis People with obesity and a normal metabolic profile are sometimes referred to as having ‘metabolically healthy obesity’ (MHO). However, whether this group of individuals are actually ‘healthy’ is uncertain. This study aims to examine the associations of MHO with a wide range of obesity-related outcomes. Methods This is a population-based prospective cohort study of 381,363 UK Biobank participants with a median follow-up of 11.2 years. MHO was defined as having a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and at least four of the six metabolically healthy criteria. Outcomes included incident diabetes and incident and fatal atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), heart failure (HF) and respiratory diseases. Results Compared with people who were not obese at baseline, those with MHO had higher incident HF (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.45, 1.75) and respiratory disease (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.16, 1.25) rates, but not higher ASCVD. The associations of MHO were generally weaker for fatal outcomes and only significant for all-cause (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04, 1.21) and HF mortality rates (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09, 1.89). However, when compared with people who were metabolically healthy without obesity, participants with MHO had higher rates of incident diabetes (HR 4.32; 95% CI 3.83, 4.89), ASCVD (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.10, 1.27), HF (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.61, 1.92), respiratory diseases (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.24, 1.33) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.14, 1.31). The results with a 5 year landmark analysis were similar. Conclusions/interpretation Weight management should be recommended to all people with obesity, irrespective of their metabolic status, to lower risk of diabetes, ASCVD, HF and respiratory diseases. The term ‘MHO’ should be avoided as it is misleading and different strategies for risk stratification should be explored. Graphical abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document