scholarly journals Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

10.2196/23473 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. e23473
Author(s):  
Mariam El Benny ◽  
Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian ◽  
Fadi El-Jardali ◽  
Marco Bardus
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Noncommunicable Diseases ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ehealth Literacy

Background Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being adopted globally to address various public health issues. DHIs can be categorized according to four main types of technology: mobile based, web based, telehealth, and electronic health records. In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the eHealth literacy model, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information. Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs. Objective This study aims to explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, describe which health conditions are addressed, and which technologies are used. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on randomized controlled trial design and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. A duplicate selection and data extraction process was performed; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain. Results We identified 131 unique DHIs conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020. Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=81, 61.8%), delivered via the web (n=68, 51.9%), and addressed issues related to noncommunicable diseases (n=57, 43.5%) or mental health (n=26, 19.8%). None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model. Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (n=96, 73.2%), followed by digital (n=19, 14.5%), basic and media (n=4, 3%), and information and scientific literacy (n=1, 0.7%). Of the 131 studies, 7 (5.3%) studies covered both health and digital literacy. Conclusions Although many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might be overlooking important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions. Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluating interventions to understand how and why interventions can be effective.

scholarly journals Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam El Benny ◽  
Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian ◽  
Fadi El-Jardali ◽  
Marco Bardus
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Noncommunicable Diseases ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ehealth Literacy

BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being adopted globally to address various public health issues. DHIs can be categorized according to four main types of technology: mobile based, web based, telehealth, and electronic health records. In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the <i>eHealth literacy model</i>, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information. Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, describe which health conditions are addressed, and which technologies are used. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on randomized controlled trial design and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. A duplicate selection and data extraction process was performed; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain. RESULTS We identified 131 unique DHIs conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020. Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=81, 61.8%), delivered via the web (n=68, 51.9%), and addressed issues related to noncommunicable diseases (n=57, 43.5%) or mental health (n=26, 19.8%). None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model. Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (n=96, 73.2%), followed by digital (n=19, 14.5%), basic and media (n=4, 3%), and information and scientific literacy (n=1, 0.7%). Of the 131 studies, 7 (5.3%) studies covered both health and digital literacy. CONCLUSIONS Although many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might be overlooking important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions. Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluating interventions to understand how and why interventions can be effective.

P5307A consumer-direct digital health intervention for cardiovascular risk management in primary care: the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Redfern ◽  
T Usherwood ◽  
G Coorey ◽  
J Mulley ◽  
A Scaria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Ehealth Literacy ◽  
Health Strategy ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Digital health interventions linked to electronic health records offer patients an innovative approach to support cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk management. Purpose Test the effectiveness of a consumer-directed digital health strategy on medication adherence and cardiovascular health outcomes in patients presenting to primary care who are at moderate to high risk of CVD. Methods Randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 12 month follow-up. Intervention group received an interactive digital health strategy for CVD management. The intervention was integrated with patient's electronic health record to enable automated population of risk factor and medication data (Figure). Control group received usual care. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients taking guideline-recommended BP and cholesterol-lowering medications on at least 80% of days (administrative data). Secondary outcomes included mean SBP, LDL-cholesterol, BMI and proportion meeting risk targets for physical activity, achieving smoking cessation, quality of life (EQ5D) and ehealth literacy (eHEALS). Results Intervention (n=486) and control (n=448) groups were well matched at baseline (Table). Mean age of participants was 67±8.1 years, 77% were male, 41% had existing CVD. At 12 months, there was no significant difference between the groups for medication days covered or mean cholesterol and BP (Table). However, there were significantly more patients in the intervention than control group who were physically active and had high ehealth literacy (Table). Table 1. Primary and Secondary Outcomes Baseline 12 months Outcome Control (n=448) Intervention (n=486) Control (n=431) Intervention (n=460) p value* Taking BP and cholesterol medication on ≥80% of days, % 29.7 28.9 29.9 32.8 0.485 SBP (mmHg), mean±SD 139.0±16.6 137.3±15.9 136.3±16.1 136.4±17.6 0.921 LDL (mmol/L), mean±SD 2.6±1.0 2.6±1.0 2.5±0.9 2.4±1.0 0.240 BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD 29.7±5.1 29.9±5.7 29.4±5.0 29.7±5.7 0.508 Proportion achieving BP and LDL target, % 11.2 12.3 11.7 16.5 0.065 Physically active, % 84.0 85.4 79.7 87.0 0.016 Current smoker, % 12.9 13.0 12.0 8.1 0.087 eHEALS, mean±SD 27.0±6.4 27.0±6.4 26.4±7.5 28.3±6.3 0.002 *Comparing intervention and control at 12 month follow-up. Conclusions The integrated digital health strategy did not significantly impact on days of medication covered however, patients in the intervention had higher physical activity and ehealth literacy. The RCT highlights the importance of conducting robust research if we are to understand the potential value of digital health interventions. Acknowledgement/Funding This work was supported by a Project Grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

scholarly journals Surveying the Role of Analytics in Evaluating Digital Mental Health Interventions for Transition-Aged Youth: Scoping Review (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Lo ◽  
Jenny Shi ◽  
Elisa Hollenberg ◽  
Alexxa Abi-Jaoudé ◽  
Andrew Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Mental Health Interventions ◽  
Usage Data

BACKGROUND Consumer-facing digital health interventions provide a promising avenue to bridge gaps in mental health care delivery. To evaluate these interventions, understanding how the target population uses a solution is critical to the overall validity and reliability of the evaluation. As a result, usage data (analytics) can provide a proxy for evaluating the engagement of a solution. However, there is paucity of guidance on how usage data or analytics should be used to assess and evaluate digital mental health interventions. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to examine how usage data are collected and analyzed in evaluations of mental health mobile apps for transition-aged youth (15-29 years). METHODS A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A systematic search was conducted on 5 journal databases using keywords related to usage and engagement, mental health apps, and evaluation. A total of 1784 papers from 2008 to 2019 were identified and screened to ensure that they included analytics and evaluated a mental health app for transition-aged youth. After full-text screening, 49 papers were included in the analysis. RESULTS Of the 49 papers included in the analysis, 40 unique digital mental health innovations were evaluated, and about 80% (39/49) of the papers were published over the past 6 years. About 80% involved a randomized controlled trial and evaluated apps with information delivery features. There were heterogeneous findings in the concept that analytics was ascribed to, with the top 3 being engagement, adherence, and acceptability. There was also a significant spread in the number of metrics collected by each study, with 35% (17/49) of the papers collecting only 1 metric and 29% (14/49) collecting 4 or more analytic metrics. The number of modules completed, the session duration, and the number of log ins were the most common usage metrics collected. CONCLUSIONS This review of current literature identified significant variability and heterogeneity in using analytics to evaluate digital mental health interventions for transition-aged youth. The large proportion of publications from the last 6 years suggests that user analytics is increasingly being integrated into the evaluation of these apps. Numerous gaps related to selecting appropriate and relevant metrics and defining successful or high levels of engagement have been identified for future exploration. Although long-term use or adoption is an important precursor to realizing the expected benefits of an app, few studies have examined this issue. Researchers would benefit from clarification and guidance on how to measure and analyze app usage in terms of evaluating digital mental health interventions for transition-aged youth. Given the established role of adoption in the success of health information technologies, understanding how to abstract and analyze user adoption for consumer digital mental health apps is also an emerging priority.

scholarly journals Surveying the Role of Analytics in Evaluating Digital Mental Health Interventions for Transition-Aged Youth: Scoping Review

10.2196/15942 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e15942
Author(s):  
Brian Lo ◽  
Jenny Shi ◽  
Elisa Hollenberg ◽  
Alexxa Abi-Jaoudé ◽  
Andrew Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Mental Health Interventions ◽  
Usage Data

Background Consumer-facing digital health interventions provide a promising avenue to bridge gaps in mental health care delivery. To evaluate these interventions, understanding how the target population uses a solution is critical to the overall validity and reliability of the evaluation. As a result, usage data (analytics) can provide a proxy for evaluating the engagement of a solution. However, there is paucity of guidance on how usage data or analytics should be used to assess and evaluate digital mental health interventions. Objective This review aimed to examine how usage data are collected and analyzed in evaluations of mental health mobile apps for transition-aged youth (15-29 years). Methods A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A systematic search was conducted on 5 journal databases using keywords related to usage and engagement, mental health apps, and evaluation. A total of 1784 papers from 2008 to 2019 were identified and screened to ensure that they included analytics and evaluated a mental health app for transition-aged youth. After full-text screening, 49 papers were included in the analysis. Results Of the 49 papers included in the analysis, 40 unique digital mental health innovations were evaluated, and about 80% (39/49) of the papers were published over the past 6 years. About 80% involved a randomized controlled trial and evaluated apps with information delivery features. There were heterogeneous findings in the concept that analytics was ascribed to, with the top 3 being engagement, adherence, and acceptability. There was also a significant spread in the number of metrics collected by each study, with 35% (17/49) of the papers collecting only 1 metric and 29% (14/49) collecting 4 or more analytic metrics. The number of modules completed, the session duration, and the number of log ins were the most common usage metrics collected. Conclusions This review of current literature identified significant variability and heterogeneity in using analytics to evaluate digital mental health interventions for transition-aged youth. The large proportion of publications from the last 6 years suggests that user analytics is increasingly being integrated into the evaluation of these apps. Numerous gaps related to selecting appropriate and relevant metrics and defining successful or high levels of engagement have been identified for future exploration. Although long-term use or adoption is an important precursor to realizing the expected benefits of an app, few studies have examined this issue. Researchers would benefit from clarification and guidance on how to measure and analyze app usage in terms of evaluating digital mental health interventions for transition-aged youth. Given the established role of adoption in the success of health information technologies, understanding how to abstract and analyze user adoption for consumer digital mental health apps is also an emerging priority.

The role of digital health for post-surgery care of older patients with hip fracture: a scoping review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yufeng Ge ◽  
Minghui Yang ◽  
Rebecca Ivers ◽  
Ruth Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Older People ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Care For Older People

BACKGROUND Digital health interventions have the potential to improve the integration of health care at all system levels. Hip fracture is a serious injury for older people and integrated post-surgery care for hip fracture is vital for good recovery. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to understand and characterise digital health interventions used for hip fracture post-surgery care, and further to examine the extent to which of these digital health interventions address the six domains of the World Health Organisation (WHO) integrated care for older people framework. METHODS A scoping review was conducted, by searching the literature from English and Chinese electronic databases and trial registries, including Medline, EMBASE, ProQuest, PsycINFO, The Cochrane library, CINAHL, Open Science Framework, Clinicaltrials.gov, VIP, China National Knowledge of Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang. Keywords used in the English database included hip fracture, post-surgery care and digital health interventions, while Chinese keywords included “Kuan Bu Gu Zhe (hip fracture)”, “Shu Hou Kang Fu (post-surgery care)” and “Shu Zi Jian Kang (digital health)”. Interventional, observational, qualitative studies as well as case reports and study reports were included in this study. We used a combined framework, the WHO integrated care for older people and WHO digital health intervention classifications, to support data synthesis. RESULTS A total of 4,542 articles were identified, of which 39 studies were included in the analysis. We identified only six randomised controlled trials. Digital health interventions were mainly used to help doctors provide clinical care and facilitate service delivery between the patients, caregivers and health providers. No studies focused on health workforce, financial policy or the development of infrastructure. The primary users of digital health interventions were limited to healthcare providers and patients, with no studies involving healthcare managers or the use of data services to support the data collection, management, use and exchange. From the post-surgery care perspective, most digital health interventions focused on physical therapy, bone protection and falls prevention. The functionalities of digital health interventions were mainly limited to health education or promotion and providing remote services. There were limited interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS There are opportunities to expand the use of digital health for post-surgery care of hip fracture patients, but this requires a stronger evidence base, including high-quality larger-scale studies, more focus on application in resource-constrained settings, expanding to more users and capabilities of interventions, and exploring the role of digital health for the integrated care model to mitigate health system challenges.

Artificial Intelligence and Ethics in Dentistry: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 002203452110138
Author(s):  
C.M. Mörch ◽  
S. Atsu ◽  
W. Cai ◽  
X. Li ◽  
S.A. Madathil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Neural Learning ◽  
Learning Techniques

Dentistry increasingly integrates artificial intelligence (AI) to help improve the current state of clinical dental practice. However, this revolutionary technological field raises various complex ethical challenges. The objective of this systematic scoping review is to document the current uses of AI in dentistry and the ethical concerns or challenges they imply. Three health care databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], SciVerse Scopus, and Cochrane Library) and 2 computer science databases (ArXiv, IEEE Xplore) were searched. After identifying 1,553 records, the documents were filtered, and a full-text screening was performed. In total, 178 studies were retained and analyzed by 8 researchers specialized in dentistry, AI, and ethics. The team used Covidence for data extraction and Dedoose for the identification of ethics-related information. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Among the included studies, 130 (73.0%) studies were published after 2016, and 93 (52.2%) were published in journals specialized in computer sciences. The technologies used were neural learning techniques for 75 (42.1%), traditional learning techniques for 76 (42.7%), or a combination of several technologies for 20 (11.2%). Overall, 7 countries contributed to 109 (61.2%) studies. A total of 53 different applications of AI in dentistry were identified, involving most dental specialties. The use of initial data sets for internal validation was reported in 152 (85.4%) studies. Forty-five ethical issues (related to the use AI in dentistry) were reported in 22 (12.4%) studies around 6 principles: prudence (10 times), equity (8), privacy (8), responsibility (6), democratic participation (4), and solidarity (4). The ratio of studies mentioning AI-related ethical issues has remained similar in the past years, showing that there is no increasing interest in the field of dentistry on this topic. This study confirms the growing presence of AI in dentistry and highlights a current lack of information on the ethical challenges surrounding its use. In addition, the scarcity of studies sharing their code could prevent future replications. The authors formulate recommendations to contribute to a more responsible use of AI technologies in dentistry.

scholarly journals Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasamin Veziari ◽  
Saravana Kumar ◽  
Matthew Leach
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicine ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Educational Strategies ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Abstract Background Over the past few decades, the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown considerably and along with it, scrutiny regarding its evidence base. While this is to be expected, and is in line with other health disciplines, research in CAM is confronted by numerous obstacles. This scoping review aims to identify and report the strategies implemented to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. Methods The scoping review was undertaken using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, JBI and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened the records, following which data extraction was completed for the included studies. Descriptive synthesis was used to summarise the data. Results Of the 7945 records identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the oBSTACLES instrument as a framework, the included studies reported diverse strategies to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. All included studies reported the use of educational strategies and collaborative initiatives with CAM stakeholders, including targeted funding, to address a range of barriers. Conclusions While the importance of addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM has been recognised, to date, much of the focus has been limited to initiatives originating from a handful of jurisdictions, for a small group of CAM disciplines, and addressing few barriers. Myriad barriers continue to persist, which will require concerted effort and collaboration across a range of CAM stakeholders and across multiple sectors. Further research can contribute to the evidence base on how best to address these barriers to promote the conduct and application of research in CAM.

scholarly journals Research and Implementation Lessons Learned From a Youth-Targeted Digital Health Randomized Controlled Trial (the ARMADILLO Study)

10.2196/13005 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e13005
Author(s):  
Lianne Gonsalves ◽  
Winnie Wangari Njeri ◽  
Megan Schroeder ◽  
Jefferson Mwaisaka ◽  
Peter Gichangi
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Text Message ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
World Health ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Client Side

Background Evidence is lacking on the efficacy of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) communication interventions for youth (aged 15-24 years), especially from low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, the World Health Organization initiated the Adolescent/Youth Reproductive Mobile Access and Delivery Initiative for Love and Life Outcomes (ARMADILLO) program, a free, menu-based, on-demand text message (SMS, short message service) platform providing validated SRH content developed in collaboration with young people. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of the ARMADILLO intervention on SRH-related outcomes was implemented in Kwale County, Kenya. Objective This paper describes the implementation challenges related to the RCT, observed during enrollment and the intervention period, and their implications for digital health researchers and program implementers. Methods This was an open, three-armed RCT. Following completion of a baseline survey, participants were randomized into the ARMADILLO intervention (arm 1), a once-a-week contact SMS text message (arm 2), or usual care (arm 3, no intervention). The intervention period lasted seven weeks, after which participants completed an endline survey. Results Two study team decisions had significant implications for the success of the trial’s enrollment and intervention implementation: a hands-off participant recruitment process and a design flaw in an initial language selection menu. As a result, three weeks after recruitment began, 660 participants had been randomized; however, 107 (53%) participants in arm 1 and 136 (62%) in arm 2 were “stuck” at the language menu. The research team called 231 of these nonengaging participants and successfully reached 136 to learn reasons for nonengagement. Thirty-two phone numbers were found to be either not linked to our participants (a wrong number) or not in their primary possession (a shared phone). Among eligible participants, 30 participants indicated that they had assumed the introductory message was a scam or spam. Twenty-seven participants were confused by some aspect of the system. Eleven were apathetic about engaging. Twenty-four nonengagers experienced some sort of technical issue. All participants eventually started their seven-week study period. Conclusions The ARMADILLO study’s implementation challenges provide several lessons related to both researching and implementing client-side digital health interventions, including (1) have meticulous phone data collection protocols to reduce wrong numbers, (2) train participants on the digital intervention in efficacy assessments, and (3) recognize that client-side digital health interventions have analog discontinuation challenges. Implementation lessons were (1) determine whether an intervention requires phone ownership or phone access, (2) digital health campaigns need to establish a credible presence in a busy digital space, and (3) interest in a service can be sporadic or fleeting. Clinical Trial International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 85156148; http://www.isrctn. com/ISRCTN85156148

scholarly journals Clinical parameters and biomarkers predicting spontaneous operational tolerance after liver transplantation: a scoping review protocol

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2059
Author(s):  
Christian Appenzeller-Herzog ◽  
Steffen Hartleif ◽  
Julien Vionnet
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Clinical Parameter ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Narrative Form ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Clinical Trial Registries ◽  
Operational Tolerance

Objective: This scoping review aims at systematically mapping reported prognostic factors for spontaneous immunosuppression (IS) free allograft tolerance (operational tolerance, OT) in non-viral hepatitis and non-autoimmune disease liver transplant (LT) recipients who are undergoing immunosuppression withdrawal (ISW). The results may inform the subsequent conduct of a systematic review with a more specific review question. Background: LT is currently the most effective treatment for end-stage liver diseases. Whereas the short-term outcomes after LT have dramatically improved over the last decades, the long-term outcomes remain unsatisfactory, mainly because of side effects of lifelong IS, such as infections, cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, and nephrotoxicity. ISW studies have shown that OT can be achieved by a subset of LT recipients and recent research has identified biomarkers of OT in these patients. However, an evidence-based selection algorithm for patients that can predictably benefit from ISW is not available to date. The planned review will, therefore, map existing knowledge on prognostic clinical parameters and biomarkers for OT. Inclusion criteria: We will consider studies that record any clinical parameter or biomarker before the initiation of ISW in paediatric or adult non-viral hepatitis and non-autoimmune disease LT recipients and analyse their possible association with ISW outcomes (OT or non-tolerance). Studies addressing the effectiveness of OT-inducing treatments will be excluded. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library will be searched for relevant articles or conference abstracts. Full-texts of selected abstracts will be independently screened for inclusion by two reviewers. References and citing articles of included records will be screened for additional relevant records. Clinical trial registries will be searched for ongoing studies, and their investigators contacted for the sharing of unpublished data. Data from included records will be independently extracted by two reviewers using a prespecified data extraction table and presented in both tabular and narrative form.

scholarly journals Functionalized Nanoparticles Activated by Photodynamic Therapy as an Antimicrobial Strategy in Endodontics: A Scoping Review

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1064
Author(s):  
Pablo Betancourt ◽  
Nadia Brocal ◽  
Eulàlia Sans-Serramitjana ◽  
Carlos Zaror
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Low Cytotoxicity

The eradication of endodontic pathogens continues to be the focus of the search for new root canal system (RCS) disinfection strategies. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) using nanoparticles (NPs) as an alternative to optimize RCS disinfection. A systematic search up to March 2021 was carried out using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Lilacs, Central Cochrane Library, and BBO databases. We included studies focused on evaluating the activation of NPs by aPDT in inoculated root canals of human or animal teeth or bacterial cultures in the laboratory. The selection process and data extraction were carried out by two researchers independently. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed. A total of seventeen studies were included, of which twelve showed a substantial antibacterial efficacy, two assessed the substantivity of the disinfection effect, and three showed low cytotoxicity. No adverse effects were reported. The use of functionalized NPs with photosensitizer molecules in aPDT has been shown to be effective in reducing the bacteria count, making it a promising alternative in endodontic disinfection. Further studies are needed to assess the development of this therapy in in vivo conditions, with detailed information about the laser parameters used to allow the development of safe and standardized protocols.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document