scholarly journals Internet-based and mobile-supported stress management as a universal prevention approach – Effectiveness and moderators from a large pragmatic randomized-controlled trial (Preprint)

10.2196/22107 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ebert ◽  
Marvin Franke ◽  
Anna-Carlotta Zarski ◽  
Matthias Berking ◽  
Heleen Riper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Stress Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Universal Prevention ◽  
Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prevention Approach

scholarly journals Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF on Antiretroviral Therapy-Associated Tuberculosis and Mortality: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mupfumi ◽  
B. Makamure ◽  
M. Chirehwa ◽  
T. Sagonda ◽  
S. Zinyowera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Limited Resource ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Sputum Smear ◽  
Smear Microscopy ◽  
Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Art Initiation

Abstract Introduction.  GeneXpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert) is now widely distributed in high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/tuberculosis (TB)-burden countries. Yet, whether the test improves patient-important outcomes within HIV treatment programs in limited resource settings is unknown. Methods.  To investigate whether use of Xpert for TB screening prior to initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) improves patient-important outcomes, in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial we assigned 424 patients to Xpert or fluorescence sputum smear microscopy (FM) at ART initiation. The primary endpoint was a composite of 3-month mortality and ART-associated TB. Results.  There was no difference in overall TB diagnosis at ART initiation (20% [n = 43] Xpert vs 21% [n = 45] FM; P = .80), with most patients in both groups treated empirically. There was no difference in time to TB treatment initiation {5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3–13) vs 8 days [IQR, 3–23; P = .26]} or loss to follow-up (32 [15%] vs 38 [18%]; P = 0.38). Although a nonsignificant reduction in mortality occurred in the Xpert group (11 [6%] vs 17 [10%]; 95% CI, −9% to 2%; P = .19), there was no difference in the composite outcome (9% [n = 17] Xpert vs 12% [n = 21] FM; difference −3%; 95% CI, −9% to 4%). Conclusions.  Among HIV-infected initiating ART, centralized TB screening with Xpert did not reduce the rate of ART-associated TB and mortality, compared with fluorescence microscopy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document