scholarly journals An Electronic Data Capture Framework (ConnEDCt) for Global and Public Health Research: Design and Implementation

10.2196/18580 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. e18580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb J Ruth ◽  
Samantha Lee Huey ◽  
Jesse T Krisher ◽  
Amy Fothergill ◽  
Bryan M Gannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Public Health Research ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Surveillance

Background When we were unable to identify an electronic data capture (EDC) package that supported our requirements for clinical research in resource-limited regions, we set out to build our own reusable EDC framework. We needed to capture data when offline, synchronize data on demand, and enforce strict eligibility requirements and complex longitudinal protocols. Based on previous experience, the geographical areas in which we conduct our research often have unreliable, slow internet access that would make web-based EDC platforms impractical. We were unwilling to fall back on paper-based data capture as we wanted other benefits of EDC. Therefore, we decided to build our own reusable software platform. In this paper, we describe our customizable EDC framework and highlight how we have used it in our ongoing surveillance programs, clinic-based cross-sectional studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in various settings in India and Ecuador. Objective This paper describes the creation of a mobile framework to support complex clinical research protocols in a variety of settings including clinical, surveillance, and RCTs. Methods We developed ConnEDCt, a mobile EDC framework for iOS devices and personal computers, using Claris FileMaker software for electronic data capture and data storage. Results ConnEDCt was tested in the field in our clinical, surveillance, and clinical trial research contexts in India and Ecuador and continuously refined for ease of use and optimization, including specific user roles; simultaneous synchronization across multiple locations; complex randomization schemes and informed consent processes; and collecting diverse types of data (laboratory, growth measurements, sociodemographic, health history, dietary recall and feeding practices, environmental exposures, and biological specimen collection). Conclusions ConnEDCt is customizable, with regulatory-compliant security, data synchronization, and other useful features for data collection in a variety of settings and study designs. Furthermore, ConnEDCt is user friendly and lowers the risks for errors in data entry because of real time error checking and protocol enforcement.

scholarly journals An Electronic Data Capture Framework (ConnEDCt) for Global and Public Health Research: Design and Implementation (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb J Ruth ◽  
Samantha Lee Huey ◽  
Jesse T Krisher ◽  
Amy Fothergill ◽  
Bryan M Gannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Public Health Research ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Surveillance

BACKGROUND When we were unable to identify an electronic data capture (EDC) package that supported our requirements for clinical research in resource-limited regions, we set out to build our own reusable EDC framework. We needed to capture data when offline, synchronize data on demand, and enforce strict eligibility requirements and complex longitudinal protocols. Based on previous experience, the geographical areas in which we conduct our research often have unreliable, slow internet access that would make web-based EDC platforms impractical. We were unwilling to fall back on paper-based data capture as we wanted other benefits of EDC. Therefore, we decided to build our own reusable software platform. In this paper, we describe our customizable EDC framework and highlight how we have used it in our ongoing surveillance programs, clinic-based cross-sectional studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in various settings in India and Ecuador. OBJECTIVE This paper describes the creation of a mobile framework to support complex clinical research protocols in a variety of settings including clinical, surveillance, and RCTs. METHODS We developed ConnEDCt, a mobile EDC framework for iOS devices and personal computers, using Claris FileMaker software for electronic data capture and data storage. RESULTS ConnEDCt was tested in the field in our clinical, surveillance, and clinical trial research contexts in India and Ecuador and continuously refined for ease of use and optimization, including specific user roles; simultaneous synchronization across multiple locations; complex randomization schemes and informed consent processes; and collecting diverse types of data (laboratory, growth measurements, sociodemographic, health history, dietary recall and feeding practices, environmental exposures, and biological specimen collection). CONCLUSIONS ConnEDCt is customizable, with regulatory-compliant security, data synchronization, and other useful features for data collection in a variety of settings and study designs. Furthermore, ConnEDCt is user friendly and lowers the risks for errors in data entry because of real time error checking and protocol enforcement.

Possible Combinations of Electronic Data Capture and Randomization Systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (03) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Haag ◽  
L. R. Pilz ◽  
D. Schrimpf
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Training Costs ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
General Data

SummaryBackground: Clinical trials (CT) are in a wider sense experiments to prove and establish clinical benefit of treatments. Nowadays electronic data capture systems (EDCS) are used more often bringing a better data management and higher data quality into clinical practice. Also electronic systems for the randomization are used to assign the patients to the treatments.Objectives: If the mentioned randomization system (RS) and EDCS are used, possibly identical data are collected in both, especially by stratified randomization. This separated data storage may lead to data inconsistency and in general data samples have to be aligned. The article discusses solutions to combine RS and EDCS. In detail one approach is realized and introduced.Methods: Different possible settings of combination of EDCS and RS are determined and the pros and cons for each solution are worked out. For the combination of two independent applications the necessary interfaces for the communication are defined. Thereby, existing standards are considered. An example realization is implemented with the help of open-source applications and state-of-the-art software development procedures.Results: Three possibilities of separate usage or combination of EDCS and RS are pre -sented and assessed: i) the complete independent usage of both systems; ii) realization of one system with both functions; and iii) two separate systems, which communicate via defined interfaces. In addition a realization of our preferred approach, the combination of both systems, is introduced using the open source tools RANDI2 and Open-Clinica.Conclusion: The advantage of a flexible independent development of EDCS and RS is shown based on the fact that these tool are very different featured. In our opinion the combination of both systems via defined interfaces fulfills the requirements of randomization and electronic data capture and is feasible in practice. In addition, the use of such a setting can reduce the training costs and the error-prone duplicated data entry.

scholarly journals Research Development Using REDCap Software

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-349
Author(s):  
Klauss Kleydmann Sabino Garcia ◽  
Amanda Amaral Abrahão
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Research Development ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Survey Instruments ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
Audit Trails

Objectives: High-quality clinical research is dependent on adequate design, methodology, and data collection. The utilization of electronic data capture (EDC) systems is recommended to optimize research data through proper management. This paper’s objective is to present the procedures of REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), which supports research development, and to promote the utilization of this software among the scientific community.Methods: REDCap’s web application version 10.4.1 released on 2021 (Vanderbilt University) is an EDC system suitable for clinical research development. This paper describes how to join the REDCap consortium and presents how to develop survey instruments and use them to collect and analyze data.Results: Since REDCap is a web application that stimulates knowledge-sharing among the scientific community, its development is not finished and it is constantly receiving updates to improve the system. REDCap’s tools provide access control, audit trails, and data security to the research team.Conclusions: REDCap is a web application that can facilitate clinical research development, mainly in health fields, and reduce the costs of conducting research. Its tools allow researchers to make the best use of EDC components, such as data storage.

How Did a Multi-Institutional Trial Show Feasibility of Electronic Data Capture in Older Patients With Cancer? Results From a Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study (Alliance A171902)

2021 ◽  
pp. 442-449
Author(s):  
Nichole A. Martin ◽  
Elizabeth S. Harlos ◽  
Kathryn D. Cook ◽  
Jennifer M. O'Connor ◽  
Andrew Dodge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Wireless Internet ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE New technology might pose problems for older patients with cancer. This study sought to understand how a trial in older patients with cancer (Alliance A171603) was successful in capturing electronic patient-reported data. METHODS Study personnel were invited via e-mail to participate in semistructured phone interviews, which were audio-recorded and qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-four study personnel from the 10 sites were interviewed; three themes emerged. The first was that successful patient-reported electronic data capture shifted work toward patients and toward study personnel at the beginning of the study. One interviewee explained, “I mean it kind of lost all advantages…by being extremely laborious.” Study personnel described how they ensured electronic devices were charged, wireless internet access was up and running, and login codes were available. The second theme was related to the first and dealt with data filtering. Study personnel described high involvement in data gathering; for example, one interviewee described, “I answered on the iPad, whatever they said. They didn't even want to use it at all.” A third theme dealt with advantages of electronic data entry, such as prompt data availability at study completion. Surprisingly, some remarks described how electronic devices brought people together, “Some of the patients, you know, it just gave them a chance to kinda talk about, you know, what was going on.” CONCLUSION High rates of capture of patient-reported electronic data were viewed favorably but occurred in exchange for increased effort from patients and study personnel and in exchange for data that were not always patient-reported in the strictest sense.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Chad guinea worm surveillance information system: A pivotal foundation for eradication

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e0009675
Author(s):  
Saugat Karki ◽  
Adam Weiss ◽  
Jina Dcruz ◽  
Dorothy Hunt ◽  
Brandon Haigood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Information Value ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Guinea Worm ◽  
Electronic Data Capture System

Background In the absence of a vaccine or pharmacological treatment, prevention and control of Guinea worm disease is dependent on timely identification and containment of cases to interrupt transmission. The Chad Guinea Worm Eradication Program (CGWEP) surveillance system detects and monitors Guinea worm disease in both humans and animals. Although Guinea worm cases in humans has declined, the discovery of canine infections in dogs in Chad has posed a significant challenge to eradication efforts. A foundational information system that supports the surveillance activities with modern data management practices is needed to support continued program efficacy. Methods We sought to assess the current CGWEP surveillance and information system to identify gaps and redundancies and propose system improvements. We reviewed documentation, consulted with subject matter experts and stakeholders, inventoried datasets to map data elements and information flow, and mapped data management processes. We used the Information Value Cycle (IVC) and Data-Information System-Context (DISC) frameworks to help understand the information generated and identify gaps. Results Findings from this study identified areas for improvement, including the need for consolidation of forms that capture the same demographic variables, which could be accomplished with an electronic data capture system. Further, the mental models (conceptual frameworks) IVC and DISC highlighted the need for more detailed, standardized workflows specifically related to information management. Conclusions Based on these findings, we proposed a four-phased roadmap for centralizing data systems and transitioning to an electronic data capture system. These included: development of a data governance plan, transition to electronic data entry and centralized data storage, transition to a relational database, and cloud-based integration. The method and outcome of this assessment could be used by other neglected tropical disease programs looking to transition to modern electronic data capture systems.

scholarly journals DICOM for Clinical Research: PACS-Integrated Electronic Data Capture in Multi-Center Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Haak ◽  
Charles-E. Page ◽  
Sebastian Reinartz ◽  
Thilo Krüger ◽  
Thomas M. Deserno
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data

scholarly journals Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules T. Mitchel ◽  
Yong Joong Kim ◽  
Joonhyuk Choi ◽  
Glen Park ◽  
Silvana Cappi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Database ◽  
Evaluation Of Data

scholarly journals The experience of the clinical trial center at Alessandria Hospital regarding the activation of COVID-19 clinical trials during the pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Roveta ◽  
Fabio Giacchero ◽  
Carolina Pelazza ◽  
Serena Penpa ◽  
Costanza Massarino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Taking Charge

Objective: The aim is to evaluate the speed in the activation of Covid-19 clinical trials at SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital of Alessandria during the pandemic. Methods: Data collection related to the activation and the conduction of clinical trials was managed using a database created through a web-based platform REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Results: 32 studies were activated in the period between March 23 and July 31, 2020. An average time of 14 days elapsed between taking charge of the request and the issuance of the authorization act. Conclusions: During the emergency it was possible to activate the trials quickly thanks to fast-track procedures, optimizing COVID-19 clinical research.

scholarly journals Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A Jibb ◽  
James S Khan ◽  
Puneet Seth ◽  
Chitra Lalloo ◽  
Lauren Mulrooney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data Capture ◽  
Electronic Data ◽  
Data Completeness ◽  
Related Data

BACKGROUND The most commonly used means to assess pain is by patient self-reported questionnaires. These questionnaires have traditionally been completed using paper-and-pencil, telephone, or in-person methods, which may limit the validity of the collected data. Electronic data capture methods represent a potential way to validly, reliably, and feasibly collect pain-related data from patients in both clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare electronic and conventional pain-related data collection methods with respect to pain score equivalence, data completeness, ease of use, efficiency, and acceptability between methods. METHODS We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from database inception until November 2019. We included all peer-reviewed studies that compared electronic (any modality) and conventional (paper-, telephone-, or in-person–based) data capture methods for patient-reported pain data on one of the following outcomes: pain score equivalence, data completeness, ease of use, efficiency, and acceptability. We used random effects models to combine score equivalence data across studies that reported correlations or measures of agreement between electronic and conventional pain assessment methods. RESULTS A total of 53 unique studies were included in this systematic review, of which 21 were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pain scores reported electronically were congruent with those reported using conventional modalities, with the majority of studies (36/44, 82%) that reported on pain scores demonstrating this relationship. The weighted summary correlation coefficient of pain score equivalence from our meta-analysis was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95). Studies on data completeness, patient- or provider-reported ease of use, and efficiency generally indicated that electronic data capture methods were equivalent or superior to conventional methods. Most (19/23, 83%) studies that directly surveyed patients reported that the electronic format was the preferred data collection method. CONCLUSIONS Electronic pain-related data capture methods are comparable with conventional methods in terms of score equivalence, data completeness, ease, efficiency, and acceptability and, if the appropriate psychometric evaluations are in place, are a feasible means to collect pain data in clinical and research settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document