scholarly journals Association Between the Use of a Mobile Health Strategy App and Biological Changes in Breast Cancer Survivors: Prospective Pre-Post Study

10.2196/15062 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e15062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Lozano-Lozano ◽  
Lucia Melguizo-Rodríguez ◽  
Carolina Fernández-Lao ◽  
Noelia Galiano-Castillo ◽  
Irene Cantarero-Villanueva ◽  
...  

Background There is a bidirectional relationship between chronic low-grade inflammation and cancer. Inflammatory markers, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), have been associated with both the malignant transformation of epithelial cells and tumor progression, thus linking low-grade inflammation with a higher risk of cancer and recurrence in the survival phase. Therefore, they are considered valuable prognostic biomarkers. Knowing and finding appropriate primary prevention strategies to modify these parameters is a major challenge in reducing the risk of cancer recurrence and increasing survival. Different therapeutic strategies have shown efficacy in the modification of these and other biological parameters, but with contradictory results. There are apparently no strategies in which telemedicine, and specifically mobile health (mHealth), are used as a means to potentially cause biological changes. Objective The objectives of this study were to: (1) check whether it is feasible to find changes in inflammation biomarkers through an mHealth strategy app as a delivery mechanism of an intervention to monitor energy balance; and (2) discover potential predictors of change of these markers in breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods A prospective quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted through an mHealth energy balance monitoring app with 73 BCSs, defined as stage I-IIIA of breast cancer and at least six months from the completion of the adjuvant therapy. Measurements included were biological salivary markers (IL-6 and C-reactive protein [CRP]), self-completed questionnaires (the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale [uMARS] and an ad hoc clinical and sociodemographic questionnaire) and physical objective measures (accelerometry, weight and height). In addition, using the logging data of the mHealth app, the rate of use (in days) was recorded during the entire experimental phase of the study. Using Stata software, a paired two-tailed t test, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and a stepwise multiple regression analysis were used to interpret the data. Results Analyzing changes in inflammatory biomarker concentrations after using the mHealth app, differences between preassessment CRP (4899.04 pg/ml; SD 1085.25) and IL-6 (87.15 pg/ml; SD 33.59) and postassessment CRP (4221.24 pg/ml; SD 911.55) and IL-6 (60.53 pg/ml; SD 36.31) showed a significant decrease in both markers, with a mean difference of –635.25 pg/ml (95% CI –935.65 to –334.85; P<.001) in CRP and –26.61 pg/ml (95% CI –42.51 to –10.71; P=.002) in IL-6. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that changes in global quality of life, as well as uMARS score and hormonal therapy, were possible predictors of change in CRP concentration after using the mHealth app. In the same way, the type of tumor removal surgery conducted, as well as changes in weight and pain score, were possible predictors of change in IL-6 concentration after using the app. Conclusions In conclusion, through the results of this study, we hypothesize that there is a possible association between an mHealth energy balance monitoring strategy and biological changes in BCSs. These changes could be explained by different biopsychosocial parameters, such as the use of the application itself, quality of life, pain, type of tumor removal surgery, hormonal treatment or obesity.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Lozano-Lozano ◽  
Irene Cantarero-Villanueva ◽  
Lydia Martin-Martin ◽  
Noelia Galiano-Castillo ◽  
Maria-José Sanchez ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Energy balance is defined as the difference between energy expenditure and energy intake. The current state of knowledge supports the need to better integrate mechanistic approaches through effective studies of energy balance in cancer population, due to it is observed a significant lack of adherence to healthy lifestyle recommendations. In an attempt to stimulate changes in breast cancer survivors (BCS) lifestyles based on energy balance, our group developed BENECA mHealth application, which has been previously validated as a reliable energy balance monitoring system. OBJECTIVE Based on our previous results, the goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of BENECA mHealth in an ecological clinical setting with breast cancer survivors, studying (1) its feasibility; and (2) pretest-posttest differences with regard to BCS’ lifestyles, quality of life (QoL), and physical activity (PA) motivation. METHODS Eighty BCS were enrolled in this prospective test-retest quasi-experimental study diagnosed with stage I to IIIA and with a body mass index over 25 kg/m2. Patients had to use BENECA mHealth for 8 weeks and were assessed at baseline and post-intervention period. Feasibility main outcomes included percentage of adoption, usage and attrition, user app-quality perception measured with the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), satisfaction with Net Promoter Score (NPS), and barriers and facilitators of its use. Clinical main outcomes included quality of life measure with EORT QLQ-C30, PA assess with accelerometry, PA motivation measure with the self-efficacy scale for physical activity (EAF), and body composition with a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Statistical (paired-sample t-tests was used) and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were analyzed. RESULTS BENECA was considered feasible by the BCS, in terms of use (76.3%; 58/76 BCS) adoption (69%; 80/116), and satisfaction (positive NPS). App quality score did not make it one of the best rated apps (3.71 ± 0.47 points out of 5). BENECA mHealth seems to improve the QoL of BCSs (global health mean difference (MD) 12.83, 95% CI 8.95–16.71, p<.001), as well as EAF score (global MD 36.99, 95% CI 25.52 – 48.46, p<.001), daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MD 7.38, 95% CI 14.37–0.39, p=.039) and reduce body weight (MD -1.42, 95% CI -1.97 – -0.87, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS BENECA mHealth can be considered feasible in a real clinical context for being able to promote behavioral changes in the lifestyles of BCSs, but it needs to be optimized to improve user satisfaction with use and functionality. This study highlights the importance of the use of mobile applications based on energy balance and how the QoL of BCSs can be improved via monitoring.


10.2196/14136 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e14136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Lozano-Lozano ◽  
Irene Cantarero-Villanueva ◽  
Lydia Martin-Martin ◽  
Noelia Galiano-Castillo ◽  
Maria-José Sanchez ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Thöne ◽  
N Obi ◽  
A Jung ◽  
M Schmidt ◽  
J Chang-Claude ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Victoria Raveis ◽  
Simona Kwon

Abstract Women have a 1-in-8 lifetime risk of breast cancer. Earlier diagnosis and treatment advances have improved 15- and 20-year survival rates. Increased survival can mean coping with the effects of cancer and its treatment over an extended period of time, while experiencing age-related changes in functioning and the emergence of other health issues. To explore breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on their issues and concerns across the life-course, focus groups were conducted with a culturally diverse sample (N=18) of survivors (72% white, 28% Black, 11% Hispanic). Participants were 44-82 years old. Most, 83% were 50 and older, 56% were 60 and older. The majority (83%) were diagnosed in their 40’s and 50’s. Two were diagnosed in their early 30’s and one at age 68. Participants reaffirmed the necessity, as a breast cancer survivor, of being a life-long health advocate on their own behalf, and the importance of being self-informed. As one woman commented: “Knowledge is power”. Survivors shared that their emergent health issues were complicated by their cancer history, and, that, as a cancer survivor, “I never stop worrying”. A widespread concern was not knowing if the health issues and co-morbidities they experienced (such as joint pain, neuropathy, tendinitis, heart disease), were age-related, a consequence of their cancer, or a late treatment effect. An overriding sentiment expressed was that clinicians have not recognized the importance of quality of life in cancer survival. As a survivor succinctly stated: “We are living longer, but we need to live long with quality of life.”


2021 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 113297
Author(s):  
Joana Perez-Tejada ◽  
Ibane Aizpurua-Perez ◽  
Ainitze Labaka ◽  
Oscar Vegas ◽  
Gurutze Ugartemendia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document