scholarly journals Evaluating the Healthy Futures Nearby Program: Protocol for Unraveling Mechanisms in Health-Related Behavior Change and Improving Perceived Health Among Socially Vulnerable Families in the Netherlands

10.2196/11305 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e11305
Author(s):  
Lette Hogeling ◽  
Lenneke Vaandrager ◽  
Maria Koelen
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Bränström ◽  
L-M Petersson ◽  
F Saboonchi ◽  
A Wennman-Larsen ◽  
K Alexanderson

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferenc Ihász ◽  
Nikolett Schulteisz ◽  
Kevin J. Finn ◽  
Krisztina Szabó ◽  
Judit Gangl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorien Brouwer‐Goossensen ◽  
Heleen M. Hertog ◽  
Marinke A. Mastenbroek‐de Jong ◽  
Lisette J. E. W. C. Gemert‐Pijnen ◽  
Erik Taal

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Krul ◽  
Armand R. J. Girbes

AbstractObjective:The objective of this study was to report on a nine years of experience of providing medical support during house parties (raves) in the Netherlands, where they can be organized legally.Design:This was a prospective, observational study of self-referred patients from 1997 to 2005. During raves, first aid stations are staffed with specifically trained medical and paramedical personnel. Self-referred patients were diagnosed, treated, and recorded using standardized methods.Results:During a nine-year period with 219 raves occurred, involving approximately three million participants, 23,581 patients visited the first aid stations. The medical usage rate (MUR) varied from 59–170 patients per 10,000 rave participants. The mean age increased from 1997 to 2005 from 18.7 ±2.7 to 23.3 ±5.7 years. The mean stay at the first aid station was 18 ±46 minutes. Most health problems were mild. Fifteen cases of severe incidents were observed with one death.Conclusions:Unique data from the Netherlands demonstrate a low number of serious, health-related, short-term problems during raves.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki A. Hawkins ◽  
Tenbroeck Smith ◽  
Luhua Zhao ◽  
Juan Rodriguez ◽  
Zahava Berkowitz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brouwer-Goossensen ◽  
H.F Lingsma ◽  
P.J. Koudstaal ◽  
H.M. den Hertog

10.2196/16982 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. e16982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Snyder ◽  
Marco Zenone ◽  
Valorie Crooks ◽  
Nadine Schuurman

Background There are a range of perceived gaps and shortcomings in the publicly funded Canadian health system. These include wait times for care, lack of public insurance coverage for dental care and pharmaceuticals, and difficulties accessing specialist care. Medical crowdfunding is a response to these gaps where individuals raise funds from their social networks to address health-related needs. Objective This study aimed to investigate the potential of crowdfunding data to better understand what health-related needs individuals are using crowdfunding for, how these needs compare with the existing commentary on health system deficiencies, and the advantages and limitations of using crowdfunding campaigns to enhance or augment our understanding of perceived health system deficiencies. Methods Crowdfunding campaigns were scraped from the GoFundMe website. These campaigns were then limited to those originating in the metropolitan Vancouver region of two health authorities during 2018. These campaigns were then further limited to those raising funds to allow the treatment of a medical problem or related to needs arising from ill health. These campaigns were then reviewed to identify the underlying health issue and motivation for pursuing crowdfunding. Results We identified 423 campaigns for health-related needs. These campaigns requested CAD $8,715,806 (US $6,088,078) in funding and were pledged CAD $3,477,384 (US $2,428,987) from 27,773 donors. The most common underlying medical condition for campaign recipients was cancer, followed by traumatic injuries from collisions and brain injury and stroke. By far, the most common factor of motivation for crowdfunding was seeking financial support for wages lost because of illness (232/684, 33.9%). Some campaigns (65/684, 9.5%) sought help with purchasing medical equipment and supplies; 8.2% (56/684) sought to fund complementary, alternative, or unproven treatments including experimental interventions; 7.2% (49/684) sought financial support to cover travel-related costs, including in-province and out-of-province (49/684, 7.2%) travel; and 6.3% (43/684) campaigns sought help to pay for medication. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates the potential of crowdfunding data to present timely and context-specific user-created insights into the perceived health-related financial needs of some Canadians. Although the literature on perceived limitations of the Canadian health system focuses on wait times for care and limited access to specialist services, among other issues, these campaigners were much more motivated by gaps in the wider social system such as costs related to unpaid time off work and travel to access care. Our findings demonstrate spatial differences in the underlying medical problems, motivations for crowdfunding, and success using crowdfunding that warrants additional attention. These differences may support established concerns that medical crowdfunding is most commonly used by individuals from relatively privileged socioeconomic backgrounds. We encourage the development of new resources to harness the power of crowdfunding data as a supplementary source of information for Canadian health system stakeholders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document