scholarly journals Effects of Cold Stimulation on Cardiac-Vagal Activation in Healthy Participants: Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/10257 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e10257
Author(s):  
Manuela Jungmann ◽  
Shervin Vencatachellum ◽  
Dimitri Van Ryckeghem ◽  
Claus Vögele
Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2165-PUB
Author(s):  
MARINA V. GERALDI ◽  
CINTHIA B.B. CAZARIN ◽  
ANA CAROLINA J. VASQUES ◽  
BRUNO G. NETO ◽  
MARIO R. MAROSTICA JUNIOR

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1927-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donel M. Martin ◽  
Rose Liu ◽  
Angelo Alonzo ◽  
Melissa Green ◽  
Michael J. Player ◽  
...  

Abstract Computer-administered cognitive training (CT) tasks are a common component of cognitive remediation treatments. There is growing evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), when given during cognitive tasks, improves performance. This randomized, controlled trial explored the potential synergistic effects of CT combined with tDCS in healthy participants. Altogether, 60 healthy participants were randomized to receive either active or sham tDCS administered during training on an adaptive CT task (dual n-back task), or tDCS alone, over 10 daily sessions. Cognitive testing (working memory, processing speed, executive function, reaction time) was conducted at baseline, end of the 10 sessions, and at 4-wk follow-up to examine potential transfer effects to non-trained tasks. Altogether, 54 participants completed the study. Over the 10 ‘online’ sessions, participants in the active tDCS+CT condition performed more accurately on the CT task than participants who received sham tDCS+CT. The performance enhancing effect, however, was present only during tDCS and did not result in greater learning (i.e. improvement over sessions) on the CT task. These results confirm prior reports of enhancement of cognitive function during tDCS stimulation. At follow-up, the active tDCS+CT group, but not the sham tDCS+CT group, showed greater gains on a non-trained test of attention and working memory than the tDCS-only group (p < 0.01). Although this gain can mainly be attributable to training, this result suggests that active tDCS may have a role in further enhancing outcomes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 310-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo ◽  
Ángel Oliva-Pascual-Vaca ◽  
Cleofás Rodríguez-Blanco ◽  
Fernando Piña-Pozo ◽  
Antonio Luque-Carrasco ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 1560-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Winkler ◽  
Julia Rheker ◽  
Bettina K. Doering ◽  
Winfried Rief

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco José González-Álvarez ◽  
Marie Carmen Valenza ◽  
Irene Cabrera-Martos ◽  
Irene Torres-Sánchez ◽  
Gerald Valenza-Demet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document