scholarly journals The Effectiveness and Safety of Utilizing Mobile Phone–Based Programs for Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/10201 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e10201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Hou ◽  
Rui Yang ◽  
Yaping Yang ◽  
Yiyong Tang ◽  
Haiquan Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

scholarly journals The Effectiveness and Safety of Utilizing Mobile Phone–Based Programs for Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Hou ◽  
Rui Yang ◽  
Yaping Yang ◽  
Yiyong Tang ◽  
Haiquan Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Pain Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

BACKGROUND Rehabilitation is crucial for postoperative patients with low back pain (LBP). However, the implementation of traditional clinic-based programs is limited in developing countries, such as China, because of the maldistribution of medical resources. Mobile phone–based programs may be a potential substitute for those who have no access to traditional rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of mobile phone–based rehabilitation systems in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS Patients who accepted spinal surgeries were recruited and randomized into 2 groups of rehabilitation treatments: (1) a mobile phone–based eHealth (electronic health) program (EH) or (2) usual care treatment (UC). The primary outcomes were (1) function and pain status assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and (2) the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were (1) general mental health and (2) quality of life (Likert scales, EuroQol-5 Dimension health questionnaire, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey). All the patients were assessed preoperatively and then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 168 of the 863 eligible patients were included and randomized in this study. Our analysis showed that the improvement of primary outcomes in the EH group was superior to the UC group at 24 months postoperatively (ODI mean 7.02, SD 3.10, P<.05; VAS mean 7.59, SD 3.42, P<.05). No significant difference of primary outcomes was found at other time points. A subgroup analysis showed that the improvements of the primary outcomes were more significant in those who completed 6 or more training sessions each week throughout the trial (the highest compliance group) compared with the UC group at 6 months (ODI mean 17.94, SD 5.24, P<.05; VAS mean 19.56, SD 5.27, P<.05), 12 months (ODI mean 13.39, SD 5.32, P<.05; VAS mean 14.35, SD 5.23, P<.05), and 24 months (ODI mean 18.80, SD 5.22, P<.05; VAS mean 21.56, SD 5.28, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS This research demonstrated that a mobile phone–based telerehabilitation system is effective in self-managed rehabilitation for postoperative patients with LBP. The effectiveness of eHealth was more evident in participants with higher compliance. Future research should focus on improving patients’ compliance. CLINICALTRIAL Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-13003314; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=6245 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/766RAIDNc)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document