Avian Nest Box Selection and Nest Success in Burned and Unburned Southwestern Riparian Forest

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. MAX SMITH ◽  
JEFFREY F. KELLY ◽  
DEBORAH M. FINCH
Keyword(s):  
Riparian Forest ◽  
Nest Success ◽  
Nest Box ◽  
Avian Nest

Avian Nest Box Use on Islands in the Ohio River

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Sacilotto ◽  
James T. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Ohio River ◽  
Nest Box ◽  
Avian Nest

AVIAN NEST SUCCESS IN MIDWESTERN FORESTS FRAGMENTED BY AGRICULTURE

The Condor ◽  
10.1650/7358 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda G. Knutson ◽  
Gerald J. Niemi ◽  
Wesley E. Newton ◽  
Mary A. Friberg
Keyword(s):  
Nest Success ◽  
Avian Nest

Avian Nest Success in Relation to Past Grazing Regimes in a Montane Riparian System

The Condor ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth M. Ammon ◽  
Peter B. Stacey
Keyword(s):  
Nest Success ◽  
Avian Nest ◽  
Riparian System

Avian nest success, mammalian nest predator abundance, and invertebrate prey availability in a fragmented landscape

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Richmond ◽  
E. Nol ◽  
D. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Nest Success ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Landscape Composition ◽  
Percent Cover ◽  
Wood Thrush ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Prey Biomass ◽  
Predator Abundance ◽  
Avian Nest ◽  
Nest Predator

Avian nest success is largely determined by predation, but factors affecting the abundance of potential nest predators are rarely studied. We used an information–theoretic approach to assess relative support for models including invertebrate biomass, mammalian nest predator abundance, and percent cover at nests as explanatory variables for nest success of Ovenbirds ( Seiurus aurocapilla (L., 1766)) and Wood Thrush ( Hylocichla mustelina (J.F. Gmelin, 1789)). We ranked models including local vegetation characteristics and landscape composition at two spatial scales (100 and 2000 m) as explanatory variables for the abundance of mammalian nest predator groups and for prey biomass. The nest success of Ovenbirds was best explained by a positive association with percent cover by forbs and seedlings, whereas a positive relationship with prey biomass best explained the nest success of Wood Thrush. Most mammal genera were associated with landscape composition within 100 m of the study sites, and most were positively associated with housing density. Prey biomass was best explained by a positive association with less intensive agriculture within 2000 m. Implementing silvicultural techniques that preserve important habitat features within fragmented forests, limiting housing density within 100 m, and increasing the amount of less intensive agriculture within 2000 m of forest fragments may improve nest success for forest songbirds.

Edge Effects on Avian Nest Success

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 618-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Edward Gates
Keyword(s):  
Edge Effects ◽  
Nest Success ◽  
Avian Nest

Evidence of an Edge Effect on Avian Nest Success

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER BATARY ◽  
ANDRAS BALDI
Keyword(s):  
Edge Effect ◽  
Nest Success ◽  
Avian Nest

Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Will Richardson ◽  
Thomas Gardali ◽  
Stephen H. Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nest Success ◽  
Avian Nest
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document