Adapting to the Changing Legal Context: How Executive Order 13166 is Shaping Translation and Localization in Health Care

10.2190/liic6 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole St. Germaine
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Executive Order ◽  
Legal Context

scholarly journals Creating universal health care in Ireland: A legal context

Health Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Lau ◽  
Charles Larkin ◽  
Michael Harty ◽  
Shaen Corbet
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Universal Health Care ◽  
Legal Context ◽  
Universal Health

scholarly journals Health Care Utilization Before and After the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order Among People Born in Muslim-Majority Countries and Living in the US

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. e2118216
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Samuels ◽  
Lilla Orr ◽  
Elizabeth B. White ◽  
Altaf Saadi ◽  
Aasim I. Padela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Executive Order ◽  
The Us ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Muslim Majority

scholarly journals Privacy in practice: professional discourse about information control in health care

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise L. Anthony ◽  
Timothy Stablein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Professional Ethics ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Information Control ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Professional Groups ◽  
Legal Context ◽  
Information Professionals

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore different health care professionals’ discourse about privacy – its definition and importance in health care, and its role in their day-to-day work. Professionals’ discourse about privacy reveals how new technologies and laws challenge existing practices of information control within and between professional groups in health care, with implications not only for patient privacy, but also for the role of information control in professions more generally. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with n=83 doctors, nurses, and health information professionals in two academic medical centers and one veteran’s administration hospital/clinic in the Northeastern USA. Interview responses were qualitatively coded for themes and patterns across groups were identified. Findings – The health care providers and the authors studied actively sought to uphold the protection (and control) of patient information through professional ethics and practices, as well as through the use of technologies and compliance with legal regulations. They used discourses of professionalism, as well as of law and technology, to sometimes accept and sometimes resist changes to practice required in the changing technological and legal context of health care. The authors found differences across professional groups; for some, protection of patient information is part of core professional ethics, while for others it is simply part of their occupational work, aligned with organizational interests. Research limitations/implications – This qualitative study of physicians, nurses, and health information professionals revealed some differences in views and practices for protecting patient information in the changing technological and legal context of health care that suggest some professional groups (doctors) may be more likely to resist such changes and others (health information professionals) will actively adopt them. Practical implications – New technologies and regulations are changing how information is used in health care delivery, challenging professional practices for the control of patient information that may change the value or meaning of medical records for different professional groups. Originality/value – Qualitative findings suggest that professional groups in health care vary in the extent of information control they have, as well in how they view such control. Some groups may be more likely to (be able to) resist changes in the professional control of information that stem from new technologies or regulatory policies. Some professionals recognize that new IT systems and regulations challenge existing social control of information in health care, with the potential to undermine (or possibly bolster) professional self-control for some but not necessarily all occupational groups.

Trump’s Executive Order on Health Care — Can It Undermine the ACA if Congress Fails to Act?

2017 ◽  
Vol 376 (13) ◽  
pp. 1201-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Stoltzfus Jost ◽  
Simon Lazarus
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Executive Order

Nursing’s Response to the Executive Order to Advance American Kidney Health

2020 ◽  
pp. 152715442096593
Author(s):  
Kimone R. Y. Reid ◽  
Suzanne Queheillalt ◽  
Tamara Martin
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Executive Order ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Kidney Health

The state of American kidney health is currently under the microscope. In the United States, approximately 20,000 persons advance to end-stage renal disease annually. Trends indicate accelerating increases in cost of care and a high mortality rate among patients with end-stage renal disease, with only 57% of patients surviving after 3 years. An executive order by the White House has placed the transformation of kidney care at the forefront of the country’s health care agenda. The order focuses on key issues including improving outcomes, reducing treatment-related expenditures and increasing kidney donations. Mobilization of health care resources directed toward policymaking, workforce growth and development, and research will be critical to effectively achieve this executive order. Nursing’s response, as the health care profession with the most members, will be crucial to achieving response implementation and success of the order. This article describes immediate and future actions including policy, leadership, clinical, educational, and research initiatives that the nursing profession should take to advance kidney health. It calls for specific actions by nursing and focuses on nursing organizations, nursing research, quality improvement initiatives, nursing innovation, advanced practice nursing, and the nephrology and transplant nursing workforce in order to improve kidney health nationally. The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on kidney health and the implications for the profession of nursing are outlined. Although there are still many unknowns about the pandemic, nursing’s voice is necessary to ensure the ongoing delivery of high-quality care.

Malpractice & Negligence: Cal. Supreme Court Clarifies Negligence Provisions under State’s Elder Abuse Act

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Pressure Sores ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Nursing Facility ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.

A Tribute to the Late William J. Curran

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Harvard University ◽  
Legal Medicine ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
International Institute ◽  
University Professor

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document