scholarly journals Numerical Trends in Surgical Cases of Rectal Cancer at Saku Central Hospital and Future Direction of Club of Patients with Artificial Anus and Bladder.

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-595
Author(s):  
Yoshio SHIMIZU
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Artificial Anus ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Future Direction

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

scholarly journals Management of early rectal cancer; current surgical options and future direction

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 655-667
Author(s):  
Vijay Chavda ◽  
Oliver Siaw ◽  
Sanjay Chaudhri ◽  
Franscois Runau
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Early Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Options ◽  
Future Direction

Đánh giá chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân ung thư trực tràng trên và giữa được điều trị phẫu thuật nội soi cắt trực tràng trước thấp

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thong Tran Ngoc
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with upper and middle rectal cancer treated with laparoscopic low anterior resection. Material and method: Prospective and previous research from 1/2013 to 9/2019 at Hue central hospital, a laparoscopic low anterior resection was performed in 86 patients with upper and mid rectal cancer. Result: There were 40 males and 45 females with the mean age of 62,95 ± 13,13; no conversion, have seven cases anastomotic leakage. Mean follow-up duration 60 months: have five cases local recurrence (5,9%), the overall survival rate after 5 years was 45%. Quality of Life of Patients is quiet good. Conclusion: Laparoscopic low anterior resection for treatment upper and mid rectal cancer is safe and effective, quality of life of patient is quite good.

scholarly journals A CASE OF CARCINOMA IN ADENOMA ARISING IN ARTIFICIAL ANUS TWELVE YEARS AFTER RADICAL RESECTION OF RECTAL CANCER

1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1536-1540
Author(s):  
Yukiyasu TAKEUCHI ◽  
Syunnosuke MINAMI ◽  
Seiki SUGINO ◽  
Akira KASHIWAI ◽  
Manabu TAKEDA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Artificial Anus

EVALUATION THE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR TREATMENT UPPER AND MIDDLE RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 182-189
Author(s):  
Ngoc Thang Tran ◽  
Ngoc Hung Dang ◽  
Manh Ha Le ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Nhu Hiep Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Initial Results

Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility and benefits of laparoscopic low anterior resection for upper and middle rectal cancer treatment. Material and method: Prospective study from 8/2013 to 8/2017 at Hue Central Hospital, a laparoscopic low anterior resection was performed in 45 patients with upper and mid rectal cancer. Result: There were 29 males and 16 females with the mean age of 60.3 ± 11.5 (range 38 – 75), no conversion, have three cases anastomotic leakage, the mortaliy rate was 0%. Mean follow-up duration 36 months: have tow cases local recurrence (4.4%), the overall survival rate was 100%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic low anterior resection for treatment upper and mid rectal cancer is safe and effective, initial results is good. Key words: upper and middle rectal cancer, Laparoscopic low anterior resection

Surgery, Radio- and Chemo- therapy for Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 256-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Link ◽  
Staib ◽  
Kornmann ◽  
Formentini ◽  
Schatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Multimodal Treatment ◽  
Local Relapse ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Relapse Rates

The possibilities and results of multimodal treatment in rectal cancer were reviewed with respect to the results of surgical treatment only. Based on the results of 4 studies, reducing local relapse rates and increasing long term survival rates significantly, postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) + chemotherapy (CT) should remain the recommended standard for R0 resected UICC II and III rectal cancers. The addition of RT to adjuvant CT reduces local relapses without significant impact on survival (NSABP R-02). Vice versa, the addition of CT to RT or an improved CT in the RCT-concept prolongs survival. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) reduced local relapse rates in 9 studies, and extended survival in one study that evaluated all eligible patients. Preoperative RT reduced local relapse rates in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) but did not extend survival. The preoperative RCT + CT downstages resectable and nonresectable tumors and induces a higher sphincter preservation rate. Phase III data justifying its routine use in all UICC II + III stages are not yet available. This treatment may be routinely applied in nonresectable primary tumors or local relapses. Preoperative RCT (or RT) may evolve as standard, if the patient selection is improved and postoperative morbidity and long term toxicity reduced. Intraoperative RT could be added to this concept or be used together with preoperative/postoperative RT at the same indications. Postoperative adjuvant RT reduced local relapses significantly in a single trial, and no impact on survival time is reported. Since postoperative RT is inferior to preoperative RT, this treatment cannot be recommended, if RT is chosen as a single treatment modality in adjunction to surgery. The results of local tumor excisions may be improved with pre- or postoperative RCT + CT. In the future, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer might be more effective, if individualized according to prognostic factors.

A "Future Direction" for Social Psychology Texts?

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-342
Author(s):  
STEPHEN T. MARGULIS
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Future Direction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document