scholarly journals Sentence and Connected Speech Perception Abilities of Students with Cochlear Implant in Inclusive Classroom

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Sangyong Shim ◽  
Hyunjoo Lee ◽  
Kisung Lee ◽  
Yoonsun Lee ◽  
Jonghyun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Sentence Comprehension ◽  
Inclusive Classroom ◽  
Connected Speech ◽  
Student Groups ◽  
Sentence Recognition ◽  
Sentence Level ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: As the number of cochlear implant (CI) students has steadily increased in Korea, the number of CI students enrolled in inclusive classrooms has also risen. The present study aimed to investigate speech perception abilities at the sentence and connected speech levels of the CI students in inclusive classroom settings and to analyze the effects of chronological age, age at CI implantation, and wearing period of CI on speech perception.Methods: A total of 63 students were recruited from elementary (30 students) and secondary (33 students) schools. The speech perception were assessed by three sub-tests from the Korea National Institute for Special Education-Developmental Assessment of Speech Perception: Sentence Recognition Test (SRT), Sentence Comprehension Test (SCT), and Connected Speech Test (CST).Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference between SRT and SCT, but performances in CST were significantly poorer than those in sentence-level tests for both CI student groups. Also, both elementary and secondary school CI students showed, individually, a wide range of differences in performance across all tests. In SRT, SCT, and CST, 30-53% of the elementary and 23-39% of the secondary CI students did not reach the norm (-2 standard deviation) ranges, when compared to their normal peers. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the effects of three variables on speech perception were not significant.Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the CI students in the inclusive classroom need individualized rehabilitative and educational supports.

Speech Perception Performance in Experienced Cochlear-Implant Patients Receiving the SPEAK Processing Strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 Cochlear Implant

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Parkinson ◽  
Wendy S. Parkinson ◽  
Richard S. Tyler ◽  
Mary W. Lowder ◽  
Bruce J. Gantz
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Learning Effects ◽  
Processing Strategy ◽  
Subjective Ratings ◽  
Open Set ◽  
Wide Range

Sixteen experienced cochlear implant patients with a wide range of speechperception abilities received the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. Speech perception was assessed in quiet and in noise with SPEAK and with the patients' previous strategies (for most, Multipeak) at the study onset, as well as after using SPEAK for 6 months. Comparisons were made within and across the two test sessions to elucidate possible learning effects. Patients were also asked to rate the strategies on seven speech recognition and sound quality scales. After 6 months' experience with SPEAK, patients showed significantly improved mean performance on a range of speech recognition measures in quiet and noise. When mean subjective ratings were compared over time there were no significant differences noted between strategies. However, many individuals rated the SPEAK strategy better for two or more of the seven subjective measures. Ratings for "appreciation of music" and "quality of my own voice" in particular were generally higher for SPEAK. Improvements were realized by patients with a wide range of speech perception abilities, including those with little or no open-set speech recognition.

Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (07) ◽  
pp. 469-476
Author(s):  
Maria Madalena Canina Pinheiro ◽  
Patricia Cotta Mancini ◽  
Alexandra Dezani Soares ◽  
Ângela Ribas ◽  
Danielle Penna Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Paired Comparison ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Signal Design ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sentence Recognition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sound Processor

Abstract Background Speech recognition in noisy environments is a challenge for both cochlear implant (CI) users and device manufacturers. CI manufacturers have been investing in technological innovations for processors and researching strategies to improve signal processing and signal design for better aesthetic acceptance and everyday use. Purpose This study aimed to compare speech recognition in CI users using off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) processors. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted with 51 CI recipients, all users of the BTE Nucleus 5 (CP810) sound processor. Speech perception performances were compared in quiet and noisy conditions using the BTE sound processor Nucleus 5 (N5) and OTE sound processor Kanso. Each participant was tested with the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the hearing in noise test using each sound processor in a randomized order. Three test conditions were analyzed with both sound processors: (i) speech level fixed at 65 decibel sound pressure level in a quiet, (ii) speech and noise at fixed levels, and (iii) adaptive speech levels with a fixed noise level. To determine the relative performance of OTE with respect to BTE, paired comparison analyses were performed. Results The paired t-tests showed no significant difference between the N5 and Kanso in quiet conditions. In all noise conditions, the performance of the OTE (Kanso) sound processor was superior to that of the BTE (N5), regardless of the order in which they were used. With the speech and noise at fixed levels, a significant mean 8.1 percentage point difference was seen between Kanso (78.10%) and N5 (70.7%) in the sentence scores. Conclusion CI users had a lower signal-to-noise ratio and a higher percentage of sentence recognition with the OTE processor than with the BTE processor.

The Effect of Sampling Condition on Children’s Productions of Consonant Clusters

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 868-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharynne McLeod ◽  
Linda Hand ◽  
Joan B. Rosenthal ◽  
Brett Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sound ◽  
Consonant Clusters ◽  
Single Word ◽  
Connected Speech ◽  
Phonological Processes ◽  
Sampling Conditions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sampling Condition ◽  
Cluster Reduction

An investigation was conducted to compare the effects of single word and connected speech sampling conditions on the production of consonant clusters. Speech samples were obtained from 40 children with speech sound impairments who were aged 3 years: 6 months to 5 years. The children’s productions of 36 commonly occurring consonant clusters were compared across the two sampling conditions. Overall, children’s productions were more similar than different. Differences between the sampling conditions were apparent for three of the eight phonological processes studied, namely, cluster reduction, final consonant deletion, and epenthesis. Of 12 fine phonetic variations, only aspirated stops showed a significant difference between the sampling conditions. There was a wide range of individual variation.

scholarly journals Benefits of Localization and Speech Perception with Multiple Noise Sources in Listeners with a Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 044-051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille C. Dunn ◽  
Ann Perreau ◽  
Bruce Gantz ◽  
Richard S. Tyler
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
Speech Perception In Noise ◽  
Hearing Aid Use ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Array Performance

Background: Research suggests that for individuals with significant low-frequency hearing, implantation of a short-electrode cochlear implant may provide benefits of improved speech perception abilities. Because this strategy combines acoustic and electrical hearing within the same ear while at the same time preserving low-frequency residual acoustic hearing in both ears, localization abilities may also be improved. However, very little research has focused on the localization and spatial hearing abilities of users with a short-electrode cochlear implant. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate localization abilities for listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant who continue to wear hearing aids in both ears. A secondary purpose was to document speech perception abilities using a speech-in-noise test with spatially separate noise sources. Research Design: Eleven subjects that utilized a short-electrode cochlear implant and bilateral hearing aids were tested on localization and speech perception with multiple noise locations using an eight-loudspeaker array. Performance was assessed across four listening conditions using various combinations of cochlear implant and/or hearing aid use. Results: Results for localization showed no significant difference between using bilateral hearing aids and bilateral hearing aids plus the cochlear implant. However, there was a significant difference between the bilateral hearing aid condition and the implant plus use of a contralateral hearing aid for all 11 subjects. Results for speech perception showed a significant benefit when using bilateral hearing aids plus the cochlear implant over use of the implant plus only one hearing aid. Conclusion: Combined use of both hearing aids and the cochlear implant show significant benefits for both localization and speech perception in noise for users with a short-electrode cochlear implant. These results emphasize the importance of low-frequency information in two ears for the purpose of localization and speech perception in noise.

scholarly journals The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebke Lamping ◽  
Tobias Goehring ◽  
Jeremy Marozeau ◽  
Robert P. Carlyon
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Average Power ◽  
Decision Criterion ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Current Pulses ◽  
Temporal Integrator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Temporal Masking

Speech recognition in noisy environments remains a challenge for cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Unwanted charge interactions between current pulses in the same and across different electrode channels are likely to impair performance. Here we investigate the effect of reducing the number of current pulses on speech perception. This was achieved by implementing a psychoacoustic temporal-masking model where current pulses in each channel were passed through a temporal integrator to identify and remove pulses that were less likely to be perceived by the recipient. The decision criterion of the temporal integrator was varied to control the percentage of pulses removed in each condition. In experiment 1, speech in quiet was processed with a standard Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS) strategy and with 25, 50 and 75% of pulses removed. In experiment 2, performance was measured for speech in noise with the CIS reference and with 50 and 75% of pulses removed. Speech intelligibility in quiet revealed no significant difference between reference and test conditions. For speech in noise, results showed a significant improvement of 2.4 dB when removing 50% of pulses. Performance both in quiet and in noise was not significantly different between the reference and when 75% of pulses were removed. Further, by reducing the overall amount of current pulses by 25, 50, and 75% but accounting for the increase in charge necessary to compensate for the decrease in loudness, estimated average power savings of 21.15, 40.95, and 63.45%, respectively, could be possible for this set of listeners. In conclusion, removing temporally masked pulses may improve speech perception in noise and result in substantial power savings.

scholarly journals Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Yeon Lee ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Hyung Dong Jo ◽  
Yoonjoong Kim ◽  
Marge Carandang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Scala Tympani ◽  
Insertion Depth ◽  
Sentence Recognition ◽  
Open Set

AbstractThe slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.

scholarly journals Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (09) ◽  
pp. 701-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea Blankenship ◽  
Fawen Zhang ◽  
Robert Keith
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Recognition Test ◽  
Temporal Processing ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Gap Detection ◽  
Temporal Acuity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Although most cochlear implant (CI) users achieve improvements in speech perception, there is still a wide variability in speech perception outcomes. There is a growing body of literature that supports the relationship between individual differences in temporal processing and speech perception performance in CI users. Previous psychophysical studies have emphasized the importance of temporal acuity for overall speech perception performance. Measurement of gap detection thresholds (GDTs) is the most common measure currently used to assess temporal resolution. However, most GDT studies completed with CI participants used direct electrical stimulation not acoustic stimulation and they used psychoacoustic research paradigms that are not easy to administer clinically. Therefore, it is necessary to determine if the variance in GDTs assessed with clinical measures of temporal processing such as the Randomized Gap Detection Test (RGDT) can be used to explain the variability in speech perception performance. Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between temporal processing and speech perception performance in CI users. Research Design: A correlational study investigating the relationship between behavioral GDTs (assessed with the RGDT or the Expanded Randomized Gap Detection Test) and commonly used speech perception measures (assessed with the Speech Recognition Test [SRT], Central Institute for the Deaf W-22 Word Recognition Test [W-22], Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Test [CNC], Arizona Biomedical Sentence Recognition Test [AzBio], Bamford–Kowal–Bench Speech-in-Noise Test [BKB-SIN]). Study Sample: Twelve postlingually deafened adult CI users (24–83 yr) and ten normal-hearing (NH; 22–30 yr) adults participated in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: The data were collected in a sound-attenuated test booth. After measuring pure-tone thresholds, GDTs and speech perception performance were measured. The difference in performance between-participant groups on the aforementioned tests, as well as the correlation between GDTs and speech perception performance was examined. The correlations between participants’ biologic factors, performance on the RGDT and speech perception measures were also explored. Results: Although some CI participants performed as well as the NH listeners, the majority of the CI participants displayed temporal processing impairments (GDTs > 20 msec) and poorer speech perception performance than NH participants. A statistically significant difference was found between the NH and CI test groups in GDTs and some speech tests (SRT, W-22, and BKB-SIN). For the CI group, there were significant correlations between GDTs and some measures of speech perception (CNC Phoneme, AzBio, BKB-SIN); however, no significant correlations were found between biographic factors and GDTs or speech perception performance. Conclusions: Results support the theory that the variability in temporal acuity in CI users contributes to the variability in speech performance. Results also indicate that it is reasonable to use the clinically available RGDT to identify CI users with temporal processing impairments for further appropriate rehabilitation.

Use of Speech by Children From Total Communication Programs Who Wear Cochlear Implants

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Geers ◽  
Brent Spehar ◽  
Allison Sedey
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
English Language ◽  
Language Competence ◽  
Communication Program ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Total Communication ◽  
Intelligibility Ratings ◽  
English Syntax

This study examined whether children who are deaf acquire usable speech or continue to rely primarily on manual communication when they are enrolled in a total communication setting following receipt of a cochlear implant. Furthermore, it considered whether the use of speech post-implant is associated with other outcomes such as better speech perception skills, English language competence, speech intelligibility, and educational mainstreaming. Language samples were elicited from twenty- seven 8- and 9-year-olds who had received a Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant before age 5 and were enrolled in a total communication program for at least the first 3 years following implantation. Samples were transcribed by mode of production (i.e., speech or sign) and scored for lexical diversity, syntax, utterance length, and use of bound morphemes. Results revealed a wide range of mode preference, with some children using primarily speech, some primarily sign, and some using both modes to varying extents. Not only did speech users achieve higher auditory speech perception scores and speech intelligibility ratings, but they also demonstrated better comprehension and use of English syntax than did children who used little or no speech. After 3 years with an implant, speech users were more likely than children who used little or no speech to be placed in mainstream educational programs.

scholarly journals Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
pp. 579-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary A. Snapp ◽  
Michael E. Hoffer ◽  
Anthony Spahr ◽  
Suhrud Rajguru
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Bonferroni Adjustment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hearing Outcomes

AbstractThe aim of the study was to determine if contralateral routing of signal (CROS) technology results in improved hearing outcomes in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) patients and provides similar gains in speech perception in noise to traditional monaural listeners (MLs).The study is a prospective, within-subject repeated-measures experiment.Adult, English-speaking patients with bilateral severe–profound sensorineural hearing loss using an Advanced Bionics CI (n = 12) in one ear were enrolled for the study.Hearing performance in the monaural listening condition (CI only) was compared with the CROS-aided (unilateral CI + CROS) condition. Participants were tested for speech-in-noise performance using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise™ test materials in the speech front/noise front (0 degrees/0 degrees azimuth), speech front/noise back (0 degrees/180 degrees azimuth), speech deaf ear/noise monaural ear (90 degrees/270 degrees azimuth), and speech monaural ear/noise deaf ear (90 degrees/270 degrees azimuth) configurations. Localization error was assessed using three custom stimuli consisting of 1/3 octave narrowband noises centered at 500 and 4000 Hz and a broadband speech stimulus. Localization stimuli were presented at random in the front hemifield by 19 speakers spatially separated by 10 degrees. Outcomes were compared with a previously described group of traditional MLs in the CROS-aided condition (normal hearing ear + CROS).All participants were tested acutely with no adaptation to the CROS device. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests for nonparametric data and paired sample. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.00625 after Bonferroni adjustment for eight tests.Significant benefit was observed from unaided to the CI + CROS–aided condition for listening in noise across most listening conditions with the greatest benefit observed in the speech deaf ear/noise monaural ear (90 degrees/270 degrees azimuth) condition (p < 0.0005). When compared with traditional MLs, no significant difference in decibel gain from the unaided to CROS-aided conditions was observed between participant groups. There was no improvement in localization ability in the CROS-aided condition for either participant group and no significant difference in performance between traditional MLs and unilateral CI listeners.These findings support that unilateral CI users are capable of achieving similar gains in speech perception to that of traditional MLs with wireless CROS. These results indicate that the use of wireless CROS stimulation in unilateral CI recipients provides increased benefit and an additional rehabilitative option for this population when bilateral implantation is not possible. The results suggest that noninvasive CROS solutions can successfully rehabilitate certain monaural listening deficits, provide improved hearing outcomes, and expand the reach of treatment in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document