scholarly journals Rozważania o odpowiedzialności za naruszenie dyscypliny finansów publicznych i jej charakterze w kontekście art. 17 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o naruszeniu dyscypliny finansów publicznych

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-133
Author(s):  
Karol Baranowski ◽  

This paper focuses on the liability for public finances discipline violation. The grounds for the liability concerning order description that is inconsistent with the public pro-curement regulations will be indicated, i.e. such that could hinder fair competition. A significant part of the study is devoted to a detailed and broad explanation of the terms used by the legislator in Article 17 Item 1 Point 1 of the Act on Liability for Public Finances Discipline Violation. The attention was focused on presenting the essence of the order description, the nature of fair competition, as well as how the term “could” (mogłoby) should be uńderstood. The study ińcludes ań ańalysis of the ińdicated for-mulations that lead to broad and variously argued conclusions regarding the necessity and consequences of the existence of the presented regulations, as well as their impact in terms of legal certainty, implementation of public procurement and participation of the contracting authority in the procedure in this regard.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-357
Author(s):  
Theodora Pritadianing Saputri

It is internationally accepted that public procurement procedure and public contract shall be organized in accordance with the fair competition principle and fulfil the requirement of transparency. Public procurement regulations are necessary to secure the efficient use of taxpayer resources by the government in purchasing goods, services and works from the market and to ensure fair competition among the public contract should be protected and that therefore it would be necessary to amend existing regulations which prohibit or restrict this right derived from freedom of contract.  In addition, law makers should also put in place restriction with regard to corporate restructuring which main intention is to circumvent requirements of tender documents.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginijus Kanapinskas ◽  
Žydrūnas Plytnikas ◽  
Agnė Tvaronavičienė

Public procurement concentrates large public sector’s purchasing power, and has a significant impact on each country’s economic development. The purpose of public procurement procedure is transparency, non-discrimination and accordance to the principles of fair competition in acquisition of goods, services and works necessary for the smooth functioning of the public administration. Besides, public procurement can be one of the most important instruments for sustainable development and other purposes useful to the whole society and the economy of the country. This article briefly discusses the concept of sustainable public procurement, reveals its main ideas and applications. One of them, the social sphere, was chosen the main object of the research. The possibility to decrease unemployment, to increase an integration of socially vulnerable group, and to achieve other socially-oriented goals through an effective implementation of the social aspect of sustainable public procurement has been illustrated. Thus, the article analyses the concept of social procurement, assesses the current situation in Lithuania, overviews the good practice of other countries and provides recommendations for measures to extend the application of socially oriented procurement.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sitti Hasinah Abul Hassan ◽  
Suhaiza Ismail ◽  
Hawa Ahmad @ Abdul Mutalib

PurposeThe objectives of this paper are twofold. Firstly, to examine the importance of Malaysian public procurement objectives and secondly, to investigate the extent to which government suppliers adhere to public procurement principles.Design/methodology/approachFor achieving the objectives, a questionnaire survey was used. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed to government suppliers involved in the government tendering process. In return, a total of 107 useable questionnaires were received, representing a response rate of 42.8%. Descriptive statistics of the means score, standard deviation and mean score ranking were used to analyse the data.FindingsThe results revealed that the most important public procurement objective is “to ensure a continuous supply of material and services to meet the government needs from the best and reliable sources”. On the other hand, the objectives “to expand the local industrial sector by means of transfer of technology and expertise to suit the nation's needs” and “to promote alternative and multiple sourcing through supplier development according to the aspirations and vision of the government” are perceived as not important by the government suppliers. The findings also discovered a moderate level of adherence to Malaysia's public procurement principles, which consist of public accountability, transparency, open and fair competition, fair dealing and value for money. Amongst these principles, the most adhered to is the open and fair competition principle and the least adhered to is the transparency principle.Originality/valueThis study is one of the few studies that assess the government suppliers' perceptions of public procurement in Malaysia. More importantly, this study may give some ideas to various parties concerning the areas in which improvement is required to ensure that equal importance is given to the public procurement objectives and better adherence to the public procurement principles in Malaysia.


Author(s):  
Tünde Tátrai

A közpénzelköltés hatékonyságát hazai viszonylatban az éves közpénzköltés nagyságával és az alkalmazott eljárástípusok, beszerzési tárgyak számával, értékével kapcsolatosan van lehetősége a hivatalos statisztikák elemzése során az érdeklődőnek vizsgálni. A törvény preambulumában található „a közpénzek ésszerű felhasználása átláthatóságának és széles körű nyilvános ellenőrizhetőségének megteremtése, továbbá a közbeszerzések során a verseny tisztaságának biztosítása” célrendszer csak részben érvényesül. A tanulmány arra kíván rávilágítani, hogy a hazai közbeszerzés-kutatás eredményei alapján milyen elképzelés van a GDP közel 5%-án hatékony elköltéséről Magyarországon. Vajon valódi akadálya-e a közbeszerzés a tisztességtelen versenynek, s elősegíti-e a piaci folyamatok érvényesülését annak szabályozása. A szerző válaszai rávilágítanak a közbeszerzési piaci folyamatok, gyengeségek, kevésbé hatékony megnyilvánulások és kritikus vélemények okaira, melyek közvetlen kapcsolatban vannak a közbeszerzés válságos helyzetével, s azonosítják azokat a kritikus pontokat, melyeken érdemes változtatni egy reménybeli hatékonyabb állapot, piaci egyensúlyi helyzet kialakítása érdekében. _______ The analysis of public spending can be based on official statistics showing the figures of annual public spending and the value and number of different procedures and purchased items. However, public procurement spending an annual amount of 1600-1800 billion HUF of public money in an ever changing legal environment, are intended to ensure not only some efficiency in public spending, but to reach several other aims as well. Although the preamble of the public procurement law states, that “a legal environment ought to be created, where the transparency and public accountability of spending public money and fair competition regarding public procurement procedures is ensured”, these requirements are only partially met. This study, based on the results of recent analyses concerning public procurement, wishes to represent our ideas about how to spend efficiently nearly 5% of the Hungarian GDP. Is it really true, that public procurement can be regarded as a genuine means against unfair competition, and can we really foster market processes by regulating public procurement? The author answers highlight the causes of the weaknesses of public procurement procedures, inefficient practices and critical opinions, which are closely connected to the present dire state of public procurement. This study also identifies the crucial elements to be changed in order to achieve a hopefully more efficient state and a preferable market balance.


2020 ◽  
pp. 62-76
Author(s):  
Olga KYRYLENKO ◽  
Victor RUSIN

Introduction. Ukraine is undergoing an extremely important and complex process of forming a modern and effective public procurement system aimed at creating a competitive environment and further developing fair competition in public procurement, as well as ensuring compliance with international obligations by consistently adapting Ukrainian legislation to EU standards. The task of public procurement reform is to significantly reduce financial fraud in this area and achieve savings in public funds. The purpose of the article is to analyze the process of reforming the public procurement in Ukraine, focusing on the latest changes, substantiation of proposals for ways to minimize financial fraud in the field of public procurement. Results. The main milestones of formation and improvement of the public procurement system in Ukraine are considered. Emphasis is placed on the features of the current stage, which are to create better conditions for bidders and prevent financial fraud in public procurement, expanding the list of violations and strengthening penalties. Data on the most common types of violations among procurement customers are given. Conclusions. The existing risks of unfair competition in procurement are indicated and the ways of minimizing financial fraud in this area are substantiated. Emphasis is placed on the importance of preventive measures that can be used to detect violations before the conclusion of the contract. In the context of strengthening the effectiveness of control measures, it is proposed to introduce a direct rule of criminal liability for violations in the field of public procurement. The implementation of the proposed measures will help increase the effectiveness of public policy in the field of public procurement, which will ultimately allow for more economical and efficient use of public funds.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkadiusz Borowiec

Research background: The purpose of the public procurement system in the market economy should be to ensure that the public sector entities conduct purchases which are optimal from the economic point of view, as well as to prevent favoring or discrimination of entities participating in public tenders. The Public Procurement Act mentions fair competition as one of the fundamental principles. Both contractors and contracting entities are subject to this principle. In practice, however, it is very often violated in connection with a number of phenomena resulting from imperfections of the aforementioned system. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to identify the most important solutions to support the development of competition in the economy through the public procurement system, as well as to examine the obstacles and risks carried by the system itself. Another purpose is to present further action proposals based on research — actions affecting the development of competition and at the same time improving the efficiency of tenders. Methods: The article is based on the analysis of literature and on a questionnaire. The survey was conducted electronically (CAWI). The questionnaire was sent to 300 entities required to apply the provisions of the Public Procurement Law throughout the country. Another method involved a direct route (PAPI) and 155 entities participating in public tenders as contractors. Purposeful sampling was implemented to ensure reliable and expert replies. The study was carried out in the first half of 2016. Findings and Value added: The results indicate the most important solutions supporting the development of competition. They include the following: facilitating access to information about orders, improving the efficiency of state authorities in detecting collusive tendering, reducing the possibility of using the potential of third parties, and increasing the availability of data on tender results. The solutions presented in this article are evolutionary rather than revolutionary, and point primarily to the ability to streamline existing procedures and regulations and not to replace them with new ones. They should also help to improve the functioning of public procurement system in Poland, which is of great importance for the development of competition in domestic economy.


2003 ◽  
pp. 68-80
Author(s):  
A. Dementiev ◽  
A. Zolotareva ◽  
A. Reus

The most important measures stimulating the increase of efficiency and effectiveness of budget expenditures on road construction are the improvement of pricing mechanisms and increasing efficiency of the procedures of government purchases of goods, works and services. The paper includes the analysis of main problems that arise in the process of government purchases and construction pricing with the reference to budget expenditure on road construction. It includes the review and analysis of international experience and possible measures of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of government purchases and (road) construction pricing in Russia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document