Type-definable and invariant groups in o-minimal structures

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Maříková

AbstractLet M be a big o-minimal structure and G a type-definable group in Mn. We show that G is a type-definable subset of a definable manifold in Mn that induces on G a group topology. If M is an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field, then G with this group topology is even definably isomorphic to a type-definable group in some Mk with the topology induced by Mk. Part of this result holds for the wider class of so-called invariant groups: each invariant group G in Mn has a unique topology making it a topological group and inducing the same topology on a large invariant subset of the group as Mn.

1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1165-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Pillay

Let M be an o-minimal structure or a p-adically closed field. Let be the space of complete n-types over M equipped with the following topology: The basic open sets of are of the form Ũ = {p ∈ Sn (M): U ∈ p} for U an open definable subset of Mn. is a spectral space. (For M = K a real closed field, is precisely the real spectrum of K[X1, …, Xn]; see [CR].) We will equip with a sheaf of LM-structures (where LM is a suitable language). Again for M a real closed field this corresponds to the structure sheaf on (see [S]). Our main point is that when Th(M) has definable Skolem functions, then if p ∈ , it follows that M(p), the definable ultrapower of M at p, can be factored through Mp, the stalk at p with respect to the above sheaf. This depends on the observation that if M ≺ N, a ∈ Nn and f is an M-definable (partial) function defined at a, then there is an open M-definable set U ⊂ Nn with a ∈ U, and a continuous M-definable function g:U → N such that g(a) = f(a).In the case that M is an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field (or M is a p-adically closed field), it turns out that M(p) can be recovered as the unique quotient of Mp which is an elementary extension of M.


2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Tressl

§1. Introduction. Let M be a totally ordered set. A (Dedekind) cut p of M is a couple (pL, pR) of subsets pL, pR of M such that pL ⋃ pR = M and pL < pR, i.e., a < b for all a ∈ pL, b ∈ pR. In this article we are looking for model completeness results of o-minimal structures M expanded by a set pL for a cut p of M. This means the following. Let M be an o-minimal structure in the language L and suppose M is model complete. Let D be a new unary predicate and let p be a cut of (the underlying ordered set of) M. Then we are looking for a natural, definable expansion of the L(D)-structure (M, pL) which is model complete.The first result in this direction is a theorem of Cherlin and Dickmann (cf. [Ch-Dic]) which says that a real closed field expanded by a convex valuation ring has a model complete theory. This statement translates into the cuts language as follows. If Z is a subset of an ordered set M we write Z+ for the cut p with pR = {a ∈ M ∣ a > Z} and Z− for the cut q with qL = {a ∈ M ∣ a < Z}.


1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lou van den Dries

(1.1) A well-known example of a theory with built-in Skolem functions is (first-order) Peano arithmetic (or rather a certain definitional extension of it). See [C-K, pp. 143, 162] for the notion of a theory with built-in Skolem functions, and for a treatment of the example just mentioned. This property of Peano arithmetic obviously comes from the fact that in each nonempty definable subset of a model we can definably choose an element, namely, its least member.(1.2) Consider now a real closed field R and a nonempty subset D of R which is definable (with parameters) in R. Again we can definably choose an element of D, as follows: D is a union of finitely many singletons and intervals (a, b) where – ∞ ≤ a < b ≤ + ∞; if D has a least element we choose that element; if not, D contains an interval (a, b) for which a ∈ R ∪ { − ∞}is minimal; for this a we choose b ∈ R ∪ {∞} maximal such that (a, b) ⊂ D. Four cases have to be distinguished:(i) a = − ∞ and b = + ∞; then we choose 0;(ii) a = − ∞ and b ∈ R; then we choose b − 1;(iii) a ∈ R and b ∈ = + ∞; then we choose a + 1;(iv) a ∈ R and b ∈ R; then we choose the midpoint (a + b)/2.It follows as in the case of Peano arithmetic that the theory RCF of real closed fields has a definitional extension with built-in Skolem functions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 275-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elías Baro

AbstractLet be an o-minimal structure over a real closed field R. Given a simplicial complex K and some definable subsets S1, …, Sl of its realization ∣K∣ in R we prove that there exist a subdivision K′ of K and a definable triangulation φ′: ∣K′∣ → ∣K∣ of ∣K∣ partitioning S1, …, Sl with φ′ definably homotopic to id∣K∣. As an application of this result we obtain the semialgebraic Hauptvermutung.


1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-286
Author(s):  
G. Khimshiashvili

Abstract It is shown that the cardinality of a finite semi-algebraic subset over a real closed field can be computed in terms of signatures of effectively constructed quadratic forms.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-236
Author(s):  
Riccardo Ghiloni

AbstractLetRbe a real closed field, letX⊂Rnbe an irreducible real algebraic set and letZbe an algebraic subset ofXof codimension ≥ 2. Dubois and Efroymson proved the existence of an irreducible algebraic subset ofXof codimension 1 containingZ. We improve this dimension theorem as follows. Indicate by μ the minimum integer such that the ideal of polynomials inR[x1, … ,xn] vanishing onZcan be generated by polynomials of degree ≤ μ. We prove the following two results: (1) There exists a polynomialP∈R[x1, … ,xn] of degree≤ μ+1 such thatX∩P–1(0) is an irreducible algebraic subset ofXof codimension 1 containingZ. (2) LetFbe a polynomial inR[x1, … ,xn] of degreedvanishing onZ. Suppose there exists a nonsingular pointxofXsuch thatF(x) = 0 and the differential atxof the restriction ofFtoXis nonzero. Then there exists a polynomialG∈R[x1, … ,xn] of degree ≤ max﹛d, μ + 1﹜ such that, for eacht∈ (–1, 1) \ ﹛0﹜, the set ﹛x∈X|F(x) +tG(x) = 0﹜ is an irreducible algebraic subset ofXof codimension 1 containingZ. Result (1) and a slightly different version of result (2) are valid over any algebraically closed field also.


1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Singer

In this paper, we show that the theory of ordered differential fields has a model completion. We also show that any real differential field, finitely generated over the rational numbers, is isomorphic to some field of real meromorphic functions. In the last section of this paper, we combine these two results and discuss the problem of deciding if a system of differential equations has real analytic solutions. The author wishes to thank G. Stengle for some stimulating and helpful conversations and for drawing our attention to fields of real meromorphic functions.§ 1. Real and ordered fields. A real field is a field in which −1 is not a sum of squares. An ordered field is a field F together with a binary relation < which totally orders F and satisfies the two properties: (1) If 0 < x and 0 < y then 0 < xy. (2) If x < y then, for all z in F, x + z < y + z. An element x of an ordered field is positive if x > 0. One can see that the square of any element is positive and that the sum of positive elements is positive. Since −1 is not positive, an ordered field is a real field. Conversely, given a real field F, it is known that one can define an ordering (not necessarily uniquely) on F [2, p. 274]. An ordered field F is a real closed field if: (1) every positive element is a square, and (2) every polynomial of odd degree with coefficients in F has a root in F. For example, the real numbers form a real closed field. Every ordered field can be embedded in a real closed field. It is also known that, in a real closed field K, polynomials satisfy the intermediate value property, i.e. if f(x) ∈ K[x] and a, b ∈ K, a < b, and f(a)f(b) < 0 then there is a c in K such that f(c) = 0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document