scholarly journals The Usefulness of Lumbar Epidural Pressure as an Index of Intracranial Pressure

1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shodo FUJIOKA ◽  
Motoyuki KAKU ◽  
Jun-ichiro HAMADA ◽  
Akira YOKOTA ◽  
Yukitaka USHIO
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Taewook Kang ◽  
Si Young Park ◽  
Soon Hyuck Lee ◽  
Jong Hoon Park ◽  
Seung Woo Suh

OBJECTIVEBiportal endoscopic spinal surgery has been performed for several years, and its effectiveness is well known; however, no studies on its safety, specifically intracranial pressure, have been conducted to date. The authors sought to evaluate the effect of biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy on intracranial pressure by monitoring cervical epidural pressure (CEP) changes throughout the procedure.METHODSTwenty patients undergoing single-level biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy were enrolled in this study. CEPs were monitored throughout the procedure, consisting of phase 1, establishing the surgical portal and working space; phase 2, performing decompression and discectomy; and phase 3, turning off the fluid irrigation system. After discectomy was completed, the authors evaluated changes in CEP as the irrigation pressure increased serially by adding phase 4, increasing irrigation pressure with outflow open; and phase 5, increasing irrigation pressure with outflow closed.RESULTSThe mean baseline CEP was measured as 16.65 mm Hg. In phase 1, the mean CEP was 17.3 mm Hg, which was not significantly different from the baseline CEP. In phase 2, the mean CEP abruptly increased up to 35.1 mm Hg when the epidural space was first connected with the working space, followed by stabilization of the CEP at 31.65 mm Hg. In phase 4, the CEP increased as the inflow pressure increased, showing a linear correlation, but not in phase 5. No patients experienced neurological complications.CONCLUSIONSIt is important to ensure that irrigation fluid is not stagnant and is maintained continuously. More attention must be paid to keeping pressures low when opening the epidural space.


1975 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Symon ◽  
Nicholas W. C. Dorsch

✓ The authors present their experience with long-term epidural pressure recording in hydrocephalic patients. The technique identifies those with episodically raised intracranial pressure. The effect of shunts on the pressure profile in these patients is described.


1974 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Gobiet ◽  
Wolfgang Joachim Bock ◽  
Jürgen Liesegang ◽  
Wilhelm Grote

✓ A new implantable miniature intracranial pressure transducer is described whose main advantage is the possibility of zero point calibration in vivo. Comparative studies verify that epidural pressure corresponds well with ventricular fluid pressure. During long-term monitoring of 30 patients the transducer proved both safe and reliable.


1973 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Nornes

✓ Intracranial epidural pressure (EDP) was recorded in 29 patients admitted with ruptured saccular aneurysms, but unfit for immediate surgery. In 10 patients a total of 13 recurrent hemorrhages were recorded; the average time before rerupture was 7.7 days after the last hemorrhage. Ten of the rebleedings started from intracranial pressure levels at or below 400 mm H2O whereas three started from higher prerupture levels. The observations indicate an increasing risk of rebleeding as the epidural pressure decreases toward normal pressure. Most repeat hemorrhages are arrested at EDP levels about that of the diastolic blood pressure. The resulting reduced pressure gradient across the aneurysm wall is important in the arrest of hemorrhage and the maintenance of hemostasis. Measurement of internal carotid artery blood flow during the acute stage of recurrent hemorrhage shows marked changes in blood flow pattern. Arrest of blood flow occurred only at the end of diastole; forward flow occurred only during systole. The effect of intracranial-pressure-buffering mechanisms on the increased EDP after rupture is discussed. Activation of these mechanisms may reduce the EDP to acceptable pressure levels within minutes and should be awaited before decompressive management is considered. Continuous recording of the EDP in patients unfit for immediate aneurysm surgery is important in the selection of the optimal time for operation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Antonia Poca ◽  
Juan Sahuquillo ◽  
Thomaz Topczewski ◽  
Maria Jesús Peñarrubia ◽  
Asunción Muns

Object Epidural pressures have been reported as being systematically higher than ventricular fluid pressures. These discrepancies have been attributed both to the characteristics of the sensor and to the particular anatomy of the epidural space. To determine which of these two possible causes better explains higher epidural readings, the authors compared pressure values obtained during simultaneous epidural and lumbar pressure monitoring in 53 patients and during simultaneous subdural and lumbar pressure monitoring in 22 patients. The same nonfluid coupled sensor device was used in all compartments. Methods All 75 patients had normal craniospinal communication. Simultaneous intracranial and lumbar readings were performed every 30 seconds. The epidural–lumbar and subdural–lumbar pressure values were compared using correlation analysis and the Bland–Altman method. The median differences in initial epidural–lumbar and subdural–lumbar pressure values were 11 mm Hg (interquartile range 2–24 mm Hg) and 0 mm Hg (interquartile range −2 to 1 mm Hg), respectively. The correlation coefficients of the mean epidural–lumbar and subdural–lumbar intracranial pressure (ICP) values were ρ = 0.48 (p < 0.001) and ρ = 0.88 (p < 0.001), respectively. Using the Bland–Altman analysis, epidural–lumbar methods showed a mean difference of −20.93 mm Hg; epidural pressure values were systematically higher than lumbar values, and these discrepancies were greater with higher ICP values. Subdural–lumbar methods showed a mean difference of 0.35 mm Hg and both were equally valid with all mean ICP values. Conclusions Epidural ICP monitoring produces artifactually high values. These values are not related to the type of sensor used but to the specific characteristics of the epidural intracranial space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document