scholarly journals Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii)

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Herkert ◽  
Peter D. Vickery ◽  
Donald E. Kroodsma
Keyword(s):  
Ammodramus Henslowii ◽  
Henslow's Sparrow

scholarly journals Seed Preferences of Wintering Henslow's Sparrows

The Condor ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-604
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Dimiceli ◽  
Philip C. Stouffer ◽  
Erik I. Johnson ◽  
Claudia Leonardi ◽  
Edgar B. Moser
Keyword(s):  
Pinus Palustris ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Schizachyrium Scoparium ◽  
Bird Abundance ◽  
Characteristic Structure ◽  
Little Bluestem ◽  
Species Of Conservation Concern ◽  
Ammodramus Henslowii ◽  
Pine Savannas ◽  
Henslow's Sparrow

Abstract Abstract. The Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii), a species of conservation concern, winters primarily in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forest ecosystems in the southeastern U.S. These pine savannas have been reduced to 5% of their former range, with remaining patches requiring active management with fire to maintain characteristic structure and plant diversity. Wintering Henslow's Sparrow abundance tracks growing-season fires; bird abundance peaks in the winter following burning, then declines in subsequent winters. Fire also determines dominant plant species, suggesting that Henslow's Sparrows may respond to abundance of preferred seeds. To determine diet preferences of Henslow's Sparrows, we tested seeds from eight species of native plants from southeastern Louisiana pine savannas, including species common in the first winter after burning (‘fire grasses’) and species that increase in abundance in the second and subsequent winters after burning. Seed consumption by individual birds differed considerably, suggesting that Henslow's Sparrows forage on a variety of resources in the highly diverse savannas. Henslow's Sparrows preferred fire grasses, especially Muhlenbergia expansa (cutover muhly). They also preferred Dichanthelium angustifolium (needleleaf rosette grass), a species more common in the second year after burning, but consumed relatively little of the sedges Rhynchospora plumosa (plumed beaksedge) and R. gracilenta (slender beaksedge), species common in the second winter after fire. Birds consumed almost none of the ubiquitous grass Schizachyrium scoparium (little bluestem). These results suggest that preferred seeds may include those that are most common in the first winter after burning, but that some suitable seeds are available for at least another winter.

Eastern Henslow's Sparrow Breeding in West Virginia

The Auk ◽  
1936 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-453
Author(s):  
Maurice Brooks
Keyword(s):  
West Virginia ◽  
Henslow's Sparrow

scholarly journals Incorporating Availability for Detection in Estimates of Bird Abundance

The Auk ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane R. Diefenbach ◽  
Matthew R. Marshall ◽  
Jennifer A. Mattice ◽  
Daniel W. Brauning
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Sampling Period ◽  
Bird Abundance ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Variance Estimators ◽  
Bird Survey ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Ammodramus Henslowii ◽  
Further Development

Abstract Several bird-survey methods have been proposed that provide an estimated detection probability so that bird-count statistics can be used to estimate bird abundance. However, some of these estimators adjust counts of birds observed by the probability that a bird is detected and assume that all birds are available to be detected at the time of the survey. We marked male Henslow's Sparrows (Ammodramus henslowii) and Grasshopper Sparrows (A. savannarum) and monitored their behavior during May-July 2002 and 2003 to estimate the proportion of time they were available for detection. We found that the availability of Henslow's Sparrows declined in late June to <10% for 5- or 10-min point counts when a male had to sing and be visible to the observer; but during 20 May-19 June, males were available for detection 39.1% (SD = 27.3) of the time for 5-min point counts and 43.9% (SD = 28.9) of the time for 10-min point counts (n = 54). We detected no temporal changes in availability for Grasshopper Sparrows, but estimated availability to be much lower for 5-min point counts (10.3%, SD = 12.2) than for 10-min point counts (19.2%, SD = 22.3) when males had to be visible and sing during the sampling period (n = 80). For distance sampling, we estimated the availability of Henslow's Sparrows to be 44.2% (SD = 29.0) and the availability of Grasshopper Sparrows to be 20.6% (SD = 23.5). We show how our estimates of availability can be incorporated in the abundance and variance estimators for distance sampling and modify the abundance and variance estimators for the double-observer method. Methods that directly estimate availability from bird counts but also incorporate detection probabilities need further development and will be important for obtaining unbiased estimates of abundance for these species. Incorporación de la Disponibilidad para la Detección en las Estimaciones de Abundancia de Aves

Henslow's Sparrow in New York and Virginia

The Auk ◽  
1919 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-575
Author(s):  
A. H. Wright
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Henslow's Sparrow

Factors affecting nest survival of Henslow's Sparrows (Ammodramus henslowii) in southern Indiana

2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Crimmins ◽  
Patrick C. McKann ◽  
Joseph R. Robb ◽  
Jason P. Lewis ◽  
Teresa Vanosdol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nest Survival ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ammodramus Henslowii
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document