Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica)

Author(s):  
John M. Eadie ◽  
Jean-Pierre L. Savard ◽  
Mark L. Mallory
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Jean-François Ouellet ◽  
Pierre Fradette ◽  
Isabel Blouin

We report the first observations of Barrow's Goldeneyes south of the St. Lawrence estuary in typical breeding habitat during the breeding season. Until recently, the confirmed breeding locations for the species in Eastern North America were all located on the north shore of the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence.


The Auk ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Robert ◽  
Réjean Benoit ◽  
Jean-Pierre L. Savard

Abstract Little is known of the eastern North American population of Barrow's Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica), which was recently listed as “of special concern” in Canada. In 1998 and 1999, we marked 18 adult males wintering along the St. Lawrence River, Québec, with satellite transmitters to document their breeding, molting, and wintering distribution and phenology, and to describe timing and routes of their spring, molt, and fall migrations. Thirteen males moved inland from the St. Lawrence River to breed; the spring migration averaged 5.9 days, and birds arrived on breeding areas on average 9 May. All breeding areas were inland, on the north shore of the St. Lawrence River estuary and gulf. Breeding areas averaged 64.8 km from the St. Lawrence corridor. Males stayed on their respective breeding area a mean of 34.5 days, and left on average 11 June. Twelve males were tracked to their molting areas, one of which stayed on its wintering area until 5 June and flew directly to its molting area. Their molt migration averaged 18.6 days, and the mean arrival date on molting areas was 30 June. All molting areas were located north and averaged 986 km from breeding areas. Four males molted in Hudson Bay, four in Ungava Bay, two in northern Labrador, one on Baffin Island, and one inland, near the Québec–Labrador border. The mean length of stay on the molting areas was 105.3 days, and the mean date of departure from molting areas was 4 October. All goldeneyes for which the radio still functioned during fall migration returned to winter in the St. Lawrence River estuary, on average 6 November. Our results refute the idea that the main breeding area of the eastern North American population of Barrow's Goldeneyes is located in northern Québec and Labrador and rather indicate that it is in the boreal forest just north of the St. Lawrence River estuary and gulf. They also indicate that Barrow's Goldeneye males undertake a genuine molt migration, and highlight the importance of molting areas because birds stayed there approximately four months each year.


1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 3439-3446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre L. Savard

Barrow's goldeneye and bufflehead pairs defend well-delineated territories from which they exclude conspecifics. Only the male defends the territory and does so even when the female is absent. However, after the young have hatched, females of both species defend brood territories from which they exclude conspecifics. Both species are also interspecifically territorial. Barrow's goldeneye and bufflehead drakes threatened and (or) attacked 15 and 11 species, respectively. However, 55% of Barrow's goldeneye interspecific encounters were with bufflehead and 52% of bufflehead encounters were with Barrow's goldeneye. Barrow's goldeneye drakes always excluded bufflehead from their territory whereas bufflehead drakes successfully excluded yearlings, females, and unpaired Barrow's goldeneye drakes but were usually dominated by paired males. Female Barrow's goldeneye excluded all bufflehead from the brood territory and were particularly aggressive toward bufflehead broods. Food and mates are the most likely defended resources in intraspecific encounters. In interspecific encounters diving ducks were more violently attacked than dabbling ducks indicating that food may be the defended resource. Interspecific aggression of Barrow's goldeneye toward bufflehead does not appear to be misdirected intraspecific aggression but rather a directed aggression toward a food competitor and may therefore be adaptive.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 350-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Jaatinen ◽  
Markus Öst ◽  
Peter Waldeck ◽  
Malte Andersson
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Eadie ◽  
Jean-Pierre L. Savard ◽  
Mark L. Mallory
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document