scholarly journals 3D Adaptive Mesh Refinement Simulations of Pellet Injection in Tokamaks

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Samtaney ◽  
S.C. Jardin ◽  
P. Colella ◽  
D.F. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Mesh Refinement ◽  
Adaptive Mesh ◽  
Pellet Injection

scholarly journals 3D adaptive mesh refinement simulations of pellet injection in tokamaks

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Samtaney ◽  
S.C. Jardin ◽  
P. Colella ◽  
D.F. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Mesh Refinement ◽  
Adaptive Mesh ◽  
Pellet Injection

Dynamic structural analysis of connecting rod through adaptive mesh refinement for different materials

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (04) ◽  
pp. 561-570
Author(s):  
I. A. QAZI ◽  
A. F. ABBASI ◽  
M. S. JAMALI ◽  
INTIZAR INTIZAR ◽  
A. TUNIO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Mesh Refinement ◽  
Adaptive Mesh ◽  
Connecting Rod ◽  
Dynamic Structural Analysis

scholarly journals Convergence and quasi-optimal cost of adaptive algorithms for nonlinear operators including iterative linearization and algebraic solver

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Haberl ◽  
Dirk Praetorius ◽  
Stefan Schimanko ◽  
Martin Vohralík
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Algorithm ◽  
Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Elliptic Boundary ◽  
Mesh Refinement ◽  
Adaptive Mesh ◽  
Picard Iteration ◽  
Optimal Rate ◽  
Stopping Criteria ◽  
Element Discretization ◽  
Fully Adaptive

AbstractWe consider a second-order elliptic boundary value problem with strongly monotone and Lipschitz-continuous nonlinearity. We design and study its adaptive numerical approximation interconnecting a finite element discretization, the Banach–Picard linearization, and a contractive linear algebraic solver. In particular, we identify stopping criteria for the algebraic solver that on the one hand do not request an overly tight tolerance but on the other hand are sufficient for the inexact (perturbed) Banach–Picard linearization to remain contractive. Similarly, we identify suitable stopping criteria for the Banach–Picard iteration that leave an amount of linearization error that is not harmful for the residual a posteriori error estimate to steer reliably the adaptive mesh-refinement. For the resulting algorithm, we prove a contraction of the (doubly) inexact iterates after some amount of steps of mesh-refinement/linearization/algebraic solver, leading to its linear convergence. Moreover, for usual mesh-refinement rules, we also prove that the overall error decays at the optimal rate with respect to the number of elements (degrees of freedom) added with respect to the initial mesh. Finally, we prove that our fully adaptive algorithm drives the overall error down with the same optimal rate also with respect to the overall algorithmic cost expressed as the cumulated sum of the number of mesh elements over all mesh-refinement, linearization, and algebraic solver steps. Numerical experiments support these theoretical findings and illustrate the optimal overall algorithmic cost of the fully adaptive algorithm on several test cases.

scholarly journals AMReX: Block-structured adaptive mesh refinement for multiphysics applications

2021 ◽  
pp. 109434202110228
Author(s):  
Weiqun Zhang ◽  
Andrew Myers ◽  
Kevin Gott ◽  
Ann Almgren ◽  
John Bell
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Mesh Refinement ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Adaptive Mesh ◽  
Uniform Mesh ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Accelerator Design ◽  
Block Structured

Block-structured adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) provides the basis for the temporal and spatial discretization strategy for a number of Exascale Computing Project applications in the areas of accelerator design, additive manufacturing, astrophysics, combustion, cosmology, multiphase flow, and wind plant modeling. AMReX is a software framework that provides a unified infrastructure with the functionality needed for these and other AMR applications to be able to effectively and efficiently utilize machines from laptops to exascale architectures. AMR reduces the computational cost and memory footprint compared to a uniform mesh while preserving accurate descriptions of different physical processes in complex multiphysics algorithms. AMReX supports algorithms that solve systems of partial differential equations in simple or complex geometries and those that use particles and/or particle–mesh operations to represent component physical processes. In this article, we will discuss the core elements of the AMReX framework such as data containers and iterators as well as several specialized operations to meet the needs of the application projects. In addition, we will highlight the strategy that the AMReX team is pursuing to achieve highly performant code across a range of accelerator-based architectures for a variety of different applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document