scholarly journals Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. pulp and paper industry

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Martin ◽  
N. Anglani ◽  
D. Einstein ◽  
M. Khrushch ◽  
E. Worrell ◽  
...  
BioResources ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 6553-6555
Author(s):  
Rayssa Pinto ◽  
Marcos Lúcio Corazza ◽  
Luiz Pereira Ramos

The pulp and paper sector is undertaking several initiatives to decrease the carbon footprint of its industrial activities. To do so, any emission must be offset by introducing efficient carbon fixation strategies such as reforestation and the development of biobased products and processes. The production of drop-in fuels may play an important role in this scenario. Drop-in fuels provide a good way to add value to otherwise underutilized process streams and wastes, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, minimizing other environmental impacts, and improving process sustainability.


2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaas Jan Kramer ◽  
Eric Masanet ◽  
Ernst Worrell

2019 ◽  
pp. 189-230
Author(s):  
David Vogel

This chapter describes how, for four decades, California has been at the forefront of national efforts to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These initiatives began with policies to reduce energy use in order to avoid the construction of additional power plants and went on to include progressively more stringent energy efficiency standards and renewable energy mandates, additional curbs on automotive emissions, and a cap-and-trade program designed to reduce statewide greenhouse gas emissions. The emergence and expansion of these efforts demonstrates the importance of the factors that have shaped environmental policy innovations in other areas. At the same time, these policies are also distinct from those described in the previous chapters. First, they developed more incrementally, with some backsliding, much conflict, and frequent compromises. Second, some of their policy triggers—most notably, the 1973 energy crisis and California's 2000–2001 energy deregulation fiasco—were unrelated to environmental risks or threats. Third, their scope, diversity, and economic impact have been more substantial than those of the state's regulations protecting land use, coastal areas, and automotive emissions. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, in marked contrast to the state's other environmental policy threats, California cannot protect itself from the risks of global climate change. This means that the state has a critical stake in promoting a “California effect” that will encourage other political jurisdictions both in and outside the United States to also restrict their greenhouse gas emissions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document