scholarly journals In situ, field-scale evaluation of surfactant-enhanced DNAPL recovery using a single-well, ``push-pull'' test

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Istok ◽  
J.A. Field
Keyword(s):  
Field Scale ◽  
Scale Evaluation ◽  
Pull Test ◽  
Single Well

scholarly journals Push-pull tests for estimating effective porosity: expanded analytical solution and in situ application

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Paradis ◽  
Larry D. McKay ◽  
Edmund Perfect ◽  
Jonathan D. Istok ◽  
Terry C. Hazen
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Solution ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Unconfined Aquifer ◽  
Effective Porosity ◽  
Pull Test ◽  
True Value ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Pull Tests ◽  
Injection Phase

Abstract The analytical solution describing the one-dimensional displacement of the center of mass of a tracer during an injection, drift, and extraction test (push-pull test) was expanded to account for displacement during the injection phase. The solution was expanded to improve the in situ estimation of effective porosity. The truncated equation assumed displacement during the injection phase was negligible, which may theoretically lead to an underestimation of the true value of effective porosity. To experimentally compare the expanded and truncated equations, single-well push-pull tests were conducted across six test wells located in a shallow, unconfined aquifer comprised of unconsolidated and heterogeneous silty and clayey fill materials. The push-pull tests were conducted by injection of bromide tracer, followed by a non-pumping period, and subsequent extraction of groundwater. The values of effective porosity from the expanded equation (0.6–5.0%) were substantially greater than from the truncated equation (0.1–1.3%). The expanded and truncated equations were compared to data from previous push-pull studies in the literature and demonstrated that displacement during the injection phase may or may not be negligible, depending on the aquifer properties and the push-pull test parameters. The results presented here also demonstrated the spatial variability of effective porosity within a relatively small study site can be substantial, and the error-propagated uncertainty of effective porosity can be mitigated to a reasonable level (< ± 0.5%). The tests presented here are also the first that the authors are aware of that estimate, in situ, the effective porosity of fine-grained fill material.

A single well push–pull test method for in situ determination of denitrification rates in a nitrate-contaminated groundwater aquifer

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kim ◽  
J.H. Kim ◽  
B.H. Son ◽  
S.W. Oa
Keyword(s):  
Nitrous Oxide ◽  
Ground Water ◽  
Test Solution ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Pull Test ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Pull Tests

In this study a single-well, “push–pull” test method is adapted for determination of in situ denitrification rates in groundwater aquifers. The rates of stepwise reduction of nitrate to nitrite, nitrous oxide, and molecular nitrogen were determined by performing a series of push–pull tests. The method consists of the controlled injection of a prepared test solution (“push”) into an aquifer followed by the extraction of the test solution/ground water mixture (“pull”) from the same location. The injected test solution consists of ground water containing a nonreactive tracer and one or more biologically reactive solutes. Reaction rate coefficients are computed from the mass of reactant consumed and/or product formed. A single Transport Test, one Biostimulation Test, and four Activity Tests were conducted for this study. Transport tests are conducted to evaluate the mobility of solutes used in subsequent tests. These included bromide (a conservative tracer), fumarate (a carbon and/or source), and nitrate (an electron acceptor). Extraction phase breakthrough curves for all solutes were similar, indicating apparent conservative transport of the solutes prior to biostimulation. Biostimulation tests were conducted to stimulate the activity of indigenous heterotrophic denitrifying microorganisms and consisted of injection of site ground water containing fumarate and nitrate. Biostimulation was detected by the simultaneous production of carbon dioxide and nitrite after each injection. Activity tests were conducted to quantify rates of nitrate, nitrite, and nitrous oxide reduction. Estimated zero-order degradation rates decreased in the order nitrate &gt; nitrite &gt; nitrous oxide. The series of push–pull tests developed and field tested in this study should prove useful for conducting rapid, low-cost feasibility assessments for in situ denitrification in nitrate-contaminated aquifers.

Field-scale evaluation of in situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation

1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2673-2686 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Suresh C. Rao ◽  
Michael D. Annable ◽  
Randall K. Sillan ◽  
Dongping Dai ◽  
Kirk Hatfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Field Scale ◽  
Aquifer Remediation ◽  
Scale Evaluation

scholarly journals Field-scale evaluation of CFDA/SE staining coupled with multiple detection methods for assessing the transport of bacteria in situ

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Fuller ◽  
Brian J. Mailloux ◽  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Sheryl H. Streger ◽  
James A. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Methods ◽  
Field Scale ◽  
Scale Evaluation ◽  
Multiple Detection ◽  
Transport Of Bacteria

Field-Scale Evaluation of in Situ Bioaugmentation for Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater

1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (16) ◽  
pp. 2771-2781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Steffan ◽  
Kenneth L. Sperry ◽  
Matthew T. Walsh ◽  
Simon Vainberg ◽  
Charles W. Condee
Keyword(s):  
Chlorinated Solvents ◽  
Field Scale ◽  
Scale Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document