scholarly journals Relationship of DNA repair processes to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in mammalian cells. Progress report, August 1, 1977-October 31, 1980

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Repair Processes ◽  
Relationship Of

scholarly journals Tools for Decoding Ubiquitin Signaling in DNA Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Foster ◽  
Martin Attwood ◽  
Ian Gibbs-Seymour
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Dna Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Processes ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Cellular Dna

The maintenance of genome stability requires dedicated DNA repair processes and pathways that are essential for the faithful duplication and propagation of chromosomes. These DNA repair mechanisms counteract the potentially deleterious impact of the frequent genotoxic challenges faced by cells from both exogenous and endogenous agents. Intrinsic to these mechanisms, cells have an arsenal of protein factors that can be utilised to promote repair processes in response to DNA lesions. Orchestration of the protein factors within the various cellular DNA repair pathways is performed, in part, by post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitin, SUMO and other ubiquitin-like modifiers (UBLs). In this review, we firstly explore recent advances in the tools for identifying factors involved in both DNA repair and ubiquitin signaling pathways. We then expand on this by evaluating the growing repertoire of proteomic, biochemical and structural techniques available to further understand the mechanistic basis by which these complex modifications regulate DNA repair. Together, we provide a snapshot of the range of methods now available to investigate and decode how ubiquitin signaling can promote DNA repair and maintain genome stability in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Exploiting DNA Endonucleases to Advance Mechanisms of DNA Repair

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Marlo K. Thompson ◽  
Robert W. Sobol ◽  
Aishwarya Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Adaptive Immune System ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Low Cytotoxicity

The earliest methods of genome editing, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), utilize customizable DNA-binding motifs to target the genome at specific loci. While these approaches provided sequence-specific gene-editing capacity, the laborious process of designing and synthesizing recombinant nucleases to recognize a specific target sequence, combined with limited target choices and poor editing efficiency, ultimately minimized the broad utility of these systems. The discovery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat sequences (CRISPR) in Escherichia coli dates to 1987, yet it was another 20 years before CRISPR and the CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins were identified as part of the microbial adaptive immune system, by targeting phage DNA, to fight bacteriophage reinfection. By 2013, CRISPR/Cas9 systems had been engineered to allow gene editing in mammalian cells. The ease of design, low cytotoxicity, and increased efficiency have made CRISPR/Cas9 and its related systems the designer nucleases of choice for many. In this review, we discuss the various CRISPR systems and their broad utility in genome manipulation. We will explore how CRISPR-controlled modifications have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms of genome stability, using the modulation of DNA repair genes as examples.

DSB (Im)mobility and DNA Repair Compartmentalization in Mammalian Cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 427 (3) ◽  
pp. 652-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlène Lemaître ◽  
Evi Soutoglou
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells

scholarly journals An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
K W Caldecott ◽  
C K McKeown ◽  
J D Tucker ◽  
S Ljungquist ◽  
L H Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Affinity Chromatography ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Dna Ligase ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Dna Ligase Iii

XRCC1, the human gene that fully corrects the Chinese hamster ovary DNA repair mutant EM9, encodes a protein involved in the rejoining of DNA single-strand breaks that arise following treatment with alkylating agents or ionizing radiation. In this study, a cDNA minigene encoding oligohistidine-tagged XRCC1 was constructed to facilitate affinity purification of the recombinant protein. This construct, designated pcD2EHX, fully corrected the EM9 phenotype of high sister chromatid exchange, indicating that the histidine tag was not detrimental to XRCC1 activity. Affinity chromatography of extract from EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EHX resulted in the copurification of histidine-tagged XRCC1 and DNA ligase III activity. Neither XRCC1 or DNA ligase III activity was purified during affinity chromatography of extract from EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EX, a cDNA minigene that encodes untagged XRCC1, or extract from wild-type AA8 or untransfected EM9 cells. The copurification of DNA ligase III activity with histidine-tagged XRCC1 suggests that the two proteins are present in the cell as a complex. Furthermore, DNA ligase III activity was present at lower levels in EM9 cells than in AA8 cells and was returned to normal levels in EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EHX or pcD2EX. These findings indicate that XRCC1 is required for normal levels of DNA ligase III activity, and they implicate a major role for this DNA ligase in DNA base excision repair in mammalian cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document