scholarly journals Forecast of thermal-hydrological conditions and air injection test results of the single heater test at Yucca Mountain

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.T. Birkholzer ◽  
Y.W. Tsang
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Noonkester ◽  
D. Jackson ◽  
W. Jones ◽  
W. Hyde ◽  
J. Kohn ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ballard ◽  
N.D. Francis ◽  
S.R. Sobolik
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John Case ◽  
Ralph A. Wagner

Temperature distributions from the Single Heater Test of the Yucca Mountain Project were used to determine rock-mass thermal conductivity. The Single Heater Test, located in a densely welded tuff in Alcove 5 of the Exploratory Studies Facility at Yucca Mountain, is nominally 13-m wide, 10-m deep and 5.5-m high. A centrally located, 5-m long, 4 kW electrical heater was activated for 9 months. During the heating phase and subsequent cooling phase of a similar duration, temperatures were measured hourly from more than 300 thermocouples emplaced in boreholes strategically drilled into the test block. An inverse method, that assumes a linearized system, was applied. This method minimized the sum of residuals between temperature measurements and simulations. The simulations were based on temporal and spatial superposition of a series of point sources that represented a linear heat source akin to the line-source heater in the Single Heater Test. Also the method accounted for fluctuations in the power of the central heater through the use of convolution methods. Subsequently, the derived value for rock-mass thermal conductivity was compared to values determined from several laboratory and field techniques that accounted for both matrix and lithophysal porosity. In general, agreement between the various methods was good.


2002 ◽  
Vol 757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele A. Lewis ◽  
Nancy L. Dietz ◽  
Thomas H. Fanning

ABSTRACTThe dissolution behavior of the ceramic waste form (CWF) is being investigated to support its qualification for disposal in the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain. The CWF consists of sodalite and glass phases and has been consolidated either by hot isostatic pressuring (HIP) or by pressureless consolidation (PC). In this paper we compare the dissolution behavior of the two materials using in MCC-1 type tests at 90°C in a simulated silicate groundwater. The test solutions were periodically exchanged limit feedback effects. The solid surface area to volume ratio was 10 m-1. Five types of samples were tested: (1) HIP CWF, (2) binder glass vitrified by HIP, (3) PC CWF, (4) binder glass vitrified by PC, and HIP sodalite. Boron releases were used to monitor glass dissolution; these were similar in tests with HIP CWF, HIP glass, and PC CWF, but about 3X higher in tests with PC glass. At the end of the tests, the surfaces of the reacted materials were examined with scanning electron microscopy for signs of preferential dissolution. Differences in the dissolution behaviors of the materials are described and the implications of the test results regarding the performance of the CWF in the disposal system are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document