scholarly journals BOTE model: an analytic approach to predicting ground motion phenomena resulting from underground nuclear explosions

1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Analytic Approach ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions

Ground motion accelerogram analysis including dynamical instrumental correction

1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (6A) ◽  
pp. 2087-2098
Author(s):  
V. A. Jenschke ◽  
J. Penzien
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Instrumental Error ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Damping Characteristics ◽  
Standard Response ◽  
Fourier Spectra

abstract Due to inertial and damping characteristics of strong motion seismographs, recorded ground motion accelerograms may in some cases be sufficiently in error to significantly affect the results obtained when generating standard response or Fourier spectra. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to present an analytical method of generating standard spectra which will eliminate the above instrumental error and to show the significance of this error by presenting some sample results obtained from accelerograms representing both earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions.

Highrise building characteristics and responses determined from nuclear seismology

1972 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Blume
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Spectral Response ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Dynamic ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Events ◽  
San Fernando ◽  
And Behavior

abstract Reliable measurements and detailed analyses of the responses of many buildings to ground motion resulting from underground nuclear explosions are providing new and valuable information on the structural-dynamic properties and behavior of real buildings. Much, if not all, of this knowledge is applicable to the problem of resisting natural earthquake ground motion, and it is being obtained as a byproduct of the AEC underground explosive nuclear safety program which is concerned with developing techniques for making reliable predictions of response and any damage. Information is provided on oscillator spectral response values, building responses, modal contributions and combinations versus elapsed time and at times of maximum response, variations in natural periods, foundation material interaction, and biaxial motion in the horizontal plane. Data are shown for nuclear events JORUM and HANDLEY and then compared to those of prior major events. In addition, peak responses of certain Las Vegas buildings to the distant February 1971 San Fernando earthquake (U.S. Geological Survey, 1971) are provided and compared to responses to nuclear events.

scholarly journals Discriminating underground nuclear explosions leading to late-time radionuclide gas seeps

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Robert Harp ◽  
Suzanne Michelle Bourret ◽  
Philip H. Stauffer ◽  
Ed Michael Kwicklis
Keyword(s):  
Late Time ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Gas Seeps

Study of low-magnitude seismic events near the Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1563-1575
Author(s):  
Frode Ringdal
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Nuclear Test ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Scaling Effects ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Novaya Zemlya ◽  
Source Scaling ◽  
Low Magnitude

Abstract A study of available seismic data shows that all but one of the 42 known underground nuclear explosions at Novaya Zemlya have been detected and located by stations in the global seismic network. During the past 30 years, only one seismic event in this area has been unambiguously classified as an earthquake (1 August 1986, mb = 4.3). Several other small events, most of which are thought to be either chemical explosions or aftereffects of nuclear explosions, have also been detected. Since 1990, a network of sensitive regional arrays has been installed in northern Europe in preparation for the global seismic monitoring network under a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty (CTBT). This regional network has provided a detection capability for Novaya Zemlya that is shown to be close to mb = 2.5. Three low-magnitude events have been detected and located during this period, as discussed in this article: 31 December 1992 (mb = 2.7), 13 June 1995 (mb = 3.5), and 13 January 1996 (mb = 2.4). To classify the source types of these events has proved very difficult. Thus, even for the mb = 3.5 event in 1995, we have been unable to provide a confident classification of the source as either an earthquake or explosion using the available discriminants. A study of mb magnitude in different frequency bands shows, as expected, that the calculation of mb at regional distances needs to take into account source-scaling effects at high frequencies. Thus, when comparing a 4 to 8 or 8 to 16 Hz filter band to a “teleseismic” 2 to 4 Hz band, the smaller events have, relatively speaking, significantly more high-frequency energy (up to 0.5 mb units) than the larger events. This suggests that a P-wave spectral magnitude scale might be appropriate. The problem of accurately locating small events using a sparse array network is addressed using the 13 January 1996 event, which was detected by only two arrays, as an illustrative example. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of using accurately calibrated regional travel-time curves and, at the same time, illustrates how array processing can be used to identify an interfering phase from a local disturbance, thereby avoiding location errors due to erroneous phase readings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document