scholarly journals Grand Junction projects office mixed-waste treatment program, VAC*TRAX mobile treatment unit process hazards analysis

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Program ◽  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Treatment Unit ◽  
Unit Process ◽  
Mixed Waste ◽  
Process Hazards

scholarly journals The “ReWaste4.0” Project—A Review

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 764
Author(s):  
Renato Sarc
Keyword(s):  
Circular Economy ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Digital Communication ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Energy Materials ◽  
Treatment Processes ◽  
Mixed Waste ◽  
Further Development

ReWaste4.0 is an innovative and cooperative K-Project in the period 2017–2021. Through ReWaste4.0 the transformation of the non-hazardous mixed municipal and commercial waste treatment industry towards a circular economy has started by investigating and applying the new approaches of the Industry 4.0. Vision of the ReWaste4.0 is, among others, the development of treatment plants for non-hazardous waste into a “Smart Waste Factory” in which a digital communication and interconnection between material quality and machine as well as plant performance is reached. After four years of research and development, various results have been gained and the present review article summarizes, links and discuss the outputs (especially from peer-reviewed papers) of seven sub-projects, in total, within the K-project and discusses the main findings and their relevance and importance for further development of the waste treatment sector. Results are allocated into three areas, namely: contaminants in mixed waste and technical possibilities for their reduction as well as removal; secondary raw and energy materials in mixed waste and digitalization in waste characterization and treatment processes for mixed waste. The research conducted in ReWaste4.0 will be continued in ReWaste F for further development towards a particle-, sensor- and data-based circular economy in the period 2021–2025.

scholarly journals Heat pipe based municipal waste treatment unit for home energy recovery

Energy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 1210-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jouhara ◽  
T.K. Nannou ◽  
L. Anguilano ◽  
H. Ghazal ◽  
N. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Heat Pipe ◽  
Energy Recovery ◽  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Municipal Waste ◽  
Treatment Unit

Project Design of Smoked Fish Production House Integrated with Waste Treatment Unit in Bandarharjo, North Semarang

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 9642-9644
Author(s):  
Hafiz Rama Devara ◽  
Qurrotun A’yuni Khoirun Nisa ◽  
Anggun Puspitarini Siswanto
Keyword(s):  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Project Design ◽  
Fish Production ◽  
Treatment Unit ◽  
Smoked Fish ◽  
Production House

Adjustment of Chippewa Indian Alcoholics to a Predominantly White Treatment Program

1975 ◽  
Vol 37 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1284-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Hoffmann ◽  
Avis A. Noem
Keyword(s):  
Predominantly White ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
State Hospital ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Alcohol Treatment ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Treatment Unit ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Admission Variables

Indian (51, Mage = 41.8) and non-Indian (1474, Mage = 46.4) male alcoholic admissions to a state hospital alcohol treatment unit over a 2-yr. period were compared on background, admission, and discharge variables. Indian alcoholics differed significantly from non-Indian alcoholics on the background variables of mean number of times fired (7.5 vs 4.0), mean years of longest job held (5.3 vs 9.4), mean highest income ($3,300 vs $6,900), and mean income just prior to treatment ($1,200 vs $3,300). Significant differences between Indian and non-Indian alcoholics were found for the admission variables of voluntary admission (76% vs 63%), admission from own home (15% vs 37%), and spouse responsible for admission (11% vs 34%), but no significant difference was found for the number of admissions. No significant differences were found between Indian and non-Indian alcoholics for the discharge variables of discharge with approval (42% vs 56%), hospital stay of one month or less (62% vs 47%), and judged improvement during treatment (18% vs 24%). These results seem to indicate that Indian alcoholics benefited from an integrated treatment program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document