Verification and validation of a process model with adaptive remeshing for a multiphysics resistance forge weld.

This paper investigates the need for complementing automated verification of business process models with a validity analysis performed by human analysts. As business processes become increasingly automated through process aware information systems, the quality of process design becomes crucial. Although verification of process models has gained much attention, their validation, relating to the reachability of the process goal, has hardly been addressed. The paper investigates the need for model validation both theoretically and empirically. The authors present a theoretical analysis, showing that process model verification and validation are complementary in nature, and an empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of validity criteria in validating a process model. The theoretical analysis, which relates to different aspects of process model quality, shows that process model verification and validation are complementary in nature. The empirical findings corroborate the effectiveness of validity criteria and indicate that a systematic criteria-supported validity analysis improves the identification of validity problems in process models.

Download Full-text

Complementing Business Process Verification by Validity Analysis

Journal of Database Management ◽

10.4018/jdm.2011070101 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 22 (3) ◽

pp. 1-23 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Pnina Soffer ◽

Maya Kaner

Keyword(s):

Theoretical Analysis ◽

Business Process ◽

Process Model ◽

Empirical Evaluation ◽

Model Verification ◽

Verification And Validation ◽

Process Models ◽

Validity Analysis ◽

Model Verification And Validation ◽

Validity Criteria

This paper investigates the need for complementing automated verification of business process models with a validity analysis performed by human analysts. As business processes become increasingly automated through process aware information systems, the quality of process design becomes crucial. Although verification of process models has gained much attention, their validation, relating to the reachability of the process goal, has hardly been addressed. The paper investigates the need for model validation both theoretically and empirically. The authors present a theoretical analysis, showing that process model verification and validation are complementary in nature, and an empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of validity criteria in validating a process model. The theoretical analysis, which relates to different aspects of process model quality, shows that process model verification and validation are complementary in nature. The empirical findings corroborate the effectiveness of validity criteria and indicate that a systematic criteria-supported validity analysis improves the identification of validity problems in process models.

Download Full-text

Process \'prǎ|,ses\n: The Action of Moving Forward Progressively from One Point to Another on the Way to Completion

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders ◽

10.1044/jshd.4401.03 ◽

1979 ◽

Vol 44 (1) ◽

pp. 3-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Carol A. Pruning

Keyword(s):

Process Model ◽

Communicative Behaviors ◽

Adult Level ◽

Remedial Programs ◽

Stage Process ◽

The Way

A rationale for the application of a stage process model for the language-disordered child is presented. The major behaviors of the communicative system (pragmatic-semantic-syntactic-phonological) are summarized and organized in stages from pre-linguistic to the adult level. The article provides clinicians with guidelines, based on complexity, for the content and sequencing of communicative behaviors to be used in planning remedial programs.

Download Full-text