Reactor Pressure Vessel Fracture Mechanics Development and Concrete Application Testing for Grizzly

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Spencer ◽  
William Hoffman ◽  
Amit Jain ◽  
Sudipta Biswas ◽  
Som Dhulipala
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Concrete Application ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment: French Simplified Analysis Method Applied to Underclad Postulated Defect in Nozzle

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Arrieta-Ruiz ◽  
Eric Meister ◽  
Stéphane Vidard
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Core Area ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
The Core ◽  
Simplified Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Structural integrity of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is one of the main concerns regarding safety and lifetime of Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) since this component is considered as not reasonably replaceable. Fast fracture risk is the main potential damage considered in the integrity assessment of RPV. In France, deterministic integrity assessment for RPV vis-à-vis the brittle fracture risk is based on the crack initiation stage. As regards the core area in particular, the stability of an under-clad postulated flaw is currently evaluated under a Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) through a dedicated fracture mechanics simplified method called “beta method”. However, flaw stability analyses are also carried-out in several other areas of the RPV. Thence-forward performing uniform simplified inservice analyses of flaw stability is a major concern for EDF. In this context, 3D finite element elastic-plastic calculations with flaw modelling in the nozzle have been carried out recently and the corresponding results have been compared to those provided by the beta method, codified in the French RSE-M code for under-clad defects in the core area, in the most severe events. The purpose of this work is to validate the employment of the core area fracture mechanics simplified method as a conservative approach for the under-clad postulated flaw stability assessment in the complex geometry of the nozzle. This paper presents both simplified and 3D modelling flaw stability evaluation methods and the corresponding results obtained by running a PTS event. It shows that the employment of the “beta method” provides conservative results in comparison to those produced by elastic-plastic calculations for the cases here studied.

scholarly journals Recent verification activities on probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis code PASCAL4 for reactor pressure vessel

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-00573-19-00573
Author(s):  
Kai LU ◽  
Jinya KATSUYAMA ◽  
Yinsheng LI ◽  
Yuhei MIYAMOTO ◽  
Takatoshi HIROTA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Mechanics Analysis ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Deterministic and Probabilistic Assessments of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural Integrity: Benchmark Comparisons

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Turato ◽  
Vincent Venturini ◽  
Eric Meister ◽  
B. Richard Bass ◽  
Terry L. Dickson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The structural integrity assessment of a nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) during accidental conditions, such as loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), is a major safety concern. Besides Conventional deterministic calculations to justify the RPV integrity, Electricite´ de France (EDF) carries out probabilistic analyses. Since in the USA the probabilistic fracture mechanics analyses are accepted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), a benchmark has been realized between EDF and Oak Ridge Structural Assessments, Inc. (ORSA) to compare the models and the computational methodologies used in respective deterministic and probabilistic fracture mechanics analyses. Six cases involving two distinct transients imposed on RPVs containing specific flaw configurations (two axial subclad, two circumferential surface-breaking, and two axial surface-braking flaw configurations) were defined for a French vessel. In two separate phases, deterministic and probabilistic, fracture mechanics analyses were performed for these six cases.

Fracture Mechanics Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessel Irradiated Structural Steel for Short Column Type Supports and Neutron Shield Tank

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandria M. Carolan ◽  
J. Brian Hall ◽  
Stephen K. Longwell ◽  
F. Arzu Alpan ◽  
Gregory M. Imbrogno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Structural Steel ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Radiation Effects ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Radiation Embrittlement ◽  
Short Column ◽  
License Renewal ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Abstract As plants apply for 80 year licensure (subsequent license renewal), the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) has queried the nuclear power plant industry to investigate the impact of neutron embrittlement (radiation effects) on the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) structural steel supports due to extended plant operation past 60 years. The radiation effects on RPV supports were previously investigated and resolved as part of Generic Safety Issue No. 15 (GSI-15) in NUREG-0933 Revision 3 [1], NUREG-1509 [2] (published in May 1996), and NUREG/CR-5320 [3] (published in January 1989) for design life (40 years) and for first license renewal (20 additional years). The conclusions in NUREG-0933, Revision 3 stated that there were no structural integrity concerns for the RPV support structural steels; even if all the supports were totally removed (i.e. broken), the piping has acceptable margin to carry the load of the vessel. Nevertheless, for plants applying for 80 year life licensure, the U.S. NRC has requested an evaluation to show structural integrity of the RPV supports by accounting for radiation embrittlement (radiation damage) for continued operation into the second license renewal period (i.e. 80 years). The RPV support designs in light water reactors are grouped into one of five categories or types of supports: (1) skirt; (2) long-column; (3) shield-tank; (4) short column; and (5) suspension. In this paper, two of these RPV support configurations (short column supports and neutron shield tank) will be investigated using fracture mechanics to evaluate the effect of radiation embrittlement of the structural steel supports for long term operations (i.e. 80 years). The technical evaluation of other support configurations will be provided in a separate technical publication at a future date.

Fracture-Mechanics Analysis of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Beznau 1 Based on Thermal-Hydraulics Input Data From KWU-MIX and CFD Analyses

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Nicak ◽  
Richard Trewin ◽  
Elisabeth Keim ◽  
Ingo Cremer ◽  
Sebastien Blasset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Brittle Failure ◽  
Input Data ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Mechanics Analysis ◽  
Cfd Analyses ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The integrity of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) has to be ensured throughout its entire life in accordance with the applicable regulations. Typically an assessment of the RPV against brittle failure needs to be conducted by taking into account all possible loading cases. One of the most severe loading cases, which can potentially occur during the operating time, is the loss-of-coolant accident, where cold water is injected into the RPV nearly at operating conditions. High pressure in combination with a thermal shock of the ferritic pressure vessel wall caused by the injection of cold water leads to a considerable load at the belt-line area known as Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS). Usually the assessment against brittle failure is based on a deterministic fracture-mechanics analysis, in which common parameters like J-integral or stress intensity factor are employed to calculate the load path for an assumed (postulated) flaw during the PTS event. The most important input data for the fracture-mechanics analysis is the transient thermal-hydraulics (TH) load of the RPV during the emergency cooling. Such data can be calculated by analytical fluid-mixing codes verified on experiments, such as KWU-MIX, or by numerical Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools after suitable validation. In KWU-MIX, which is the standard used for TH calculations within PTS analyses, rather conservative analytical models for the quantification of mixing and, depending on the water level, condensation processes in the downcomer (including simplified stripe and plume formations) are utilized. On the contrary, the numerical CFD tools can provide best-estimate results due to the possibility to consider more realistically the stripe and plume formations as well as the geometry of the RPV in detail. In order to quantify the safety margin inherent to the standard approach, two fracture-mechanics analyses of the RPV Beznau 1 based on thermal-hydraulic input data from KWU-MIX and CFD analyses were performed. Subsequently the resulting loading paths were compared between each other and with material properties obtained from the irradiation surveillance program of the RPV to demonstrate the exclusion of brittle-fracture initiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document