scholarly journals Wrong Sign Contamination in NOvA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhilash Yallappa Dombara ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Wrong Sign

scholarly journals Probing wrong-sign Yukawa couplings at the LHC and a future linear collider

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ferreira ◽  
Rui Santos ◽  
John F. Gunion ◽  
Howard E. Haber
Keyword(s):  
Linear Collider ◽  
Yukawa Couplings ◽  
Wrong Sign ◽  
Future Linear Collider

scholarly journals Constraining wrong-sign hbb couplings with h→ϒγ

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanmoy Modak ◽  
Jorge C. Romão ◽  
Soumya Sadhukhan ◽  
João P. Silva ◽  
Rahul Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Wrong Sign

scholarly journals Corrigendum: Parity-nonconserving Effects in n-p Capture at Thermal Energies

1975 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith R Lassey ◽  
Bruce HJ McKellar
Keyword(s):  
Wrong Sign

As a result of discussions which one of us (B.H.J.McK.) has had with B. Desplanques and H. J. Pimer, we have discovered an error in sign in some of our results: all numerical values of As, At, C, Py and Q( are of the wrong sign: This error is due, in part, to a misunderstanding of Danilov's (1965) paper, in which his relative momenta are defined as

scholarly journals Wrong sign bottom Yukawa coupling in low energy supersymmetry

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina M. Coyle ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Carlos E. M. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Yukawa Coupling ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Wrong Sign

Probing Wrong-Sign hbb Couplings in $$h \rightarrow \Upsilon \gamma $$

2018 ◽  
pp. 873-875
Author(s):  
Tanmoy Modak ◽  
Jorge C. Romão ◽  
Rahul Srivastava ◽  
João P. Silva ◽  
Soumya Sadhukhan
Keyword(s):  
Wrong Sign

scholarly journals Paper 1: “Cement as a Thermoelectric Material,” [J. Mater. Res. 15, 2844-2848 (2000)] And Paper 2: “Rectifying and Thermocouple Junctions Based on Portland Cement,” J. Mater. Res. 16, 1989-1993 (2001)]

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1294-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihai Wen ◽  
D.D.L. Chung
Keyword(s):  
Portland Cement ◽  
Seebeck Coefficient ◽  
Thermoelectric Power ◽  
Carbon Fibers ◽  
Thermoelectric Material ◽  
Steel Fibers ◽  
Cement Pastes ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
P Type ◽  
Wrong Sign

In the two papers listed above, the conversion of the Seebeck coefficient (relative to copper) to the absolute thermoelectric power was done by using the wrong sign of the absolute thermoelectric power of copper (2.34 μV/°C). The corrected tables are shown below for both papers. The correction means that plain cement paste is slightly p-type rather than slightly n-type. In addition, it means that cement pastes with carbon fibers are more p-type and those with steel fibers are less n-type than reported. Note in Table III of Paper 2 that all cement pastes are p-type except for paste (ii). Note in Table IV of Paper 2 that all cement junctions are pn-junctions (rather than some being nn+-junctions).

scholarly journals The Burton and Miller Method: Unlocking Another Mystery of Its Coupling Parameter

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 1550016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Marburg
Keyword(s):  
Integral Equation ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Coupling Parameter ◽  
Solution Process ◽  
Normal Derivative ◽  
The Neumann Problem ◽  
Spurious Modes ◽  
Specific Formulation ◽  
Wrong Sign ◽  
Helmholtz Integral

The phenomenon of irregular frequencies or spurious modes when solving the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz integral equation has been extensively studied over the last six or seven decades. A class of common methods to overcome this phenomenon uses the linear combination of the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz integral equation and its normal derivative. When solving the Neumann problem, this method is usually referred to as the Burton and Miller method. This method uses a coupling parameter which, theoretically, should be complex with nonvanishing imaginary part. In practice, it is usually chosen proportional or even equal to [Formula: see text]. A literature review of papers about the Burton and Miller method and its implementations revealed that, in some cases, it is better to use [Formula: see text] as coupling parameter. The better choice depends on the specific formulation, in particular, on the harmonic time dependence and on the fundamental solution or Green’s function, respectively. Surprisingly, an unexpectedly large number of studies is based on the wrong choice of the sign in the coupling parameter. Herein, it is described which sign of the coupling parameter should be used for different configurations. Furthermore, it will be shown that the wrong sign does not just make the solution process inefficient but can lead to completely wrong results in some cases.

Various Aspects of Divergent Electromagnetic Masses: Analyticity, Scaling, and Light-Cone

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 795-803
Author(s):  
K. Morita
Keyword(s):  
Simple Model ◽  
Quark Model ◽  
Convergence Theorem ◽  
Light Cone ◽  
Property A ◽  
Current Conservation ◽  
Original Analysis ◽  
Commutator Function ◽  
Divergence Problem ◽  
Wrong Sign

Various features associated with the divergent electromagnetic self-mass of a particle are elucidated. Bjorken's original analysis is implemented with a simple convergence theorem which serves as a basis on which various models are discussed regarding their implications on the divergence problem as well as on the scaling property. A simple model of the current commutator function is proposed, on the basis of which it is argued that the quark-model light-cone commutator gives a wrong sign to the divergent self-mass due to its lack of the current conservation. It is also shown that it is the next-to-leading singularities on the light-cone of the commutator that bring forth a (logarithmically) divergent mass shift.

scholarly journals Inclusive b decays to wrong sign charmed mesons

2003 ◽  
Vol 561 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 26-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Abdallah ◽  
P. Abreu ◽  
W. Adam ◽  
P. Adzic ◽  
T. Albrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Decays ◽  
Charmed Mesons ◽  
Inclusive B Decays ◽  
Wrong Sign
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document