scholarly journals Acoustic Source Parameters and Yield Estimation for SPE Phase I and Forensics Surface Events

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kim
2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 2223-2223
Author(s):  
Andrew Marshall ◽  
Neal Evans ◽  
Chris Hackert ◽  
Karl Oelschlaeger

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 1491-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kren Rahbek Nørgaard ◽  
Stephen T. Neely ◽  
Daniel M. Rasetshwane

Author(s):  
Keehoon Kim ◽  
Arthur R. Rodgers ◽  
Milton A. Garces ◽  
Stephen C. Myers

ABSTRACT Chemical explosions generate pressure disturbances in air that radiate as nonlinear shock waves near the source and transition into acoustic waves with distance. Because low-frequency acoustic waves generally travel large distances without significant loss of energy, they are often used for explosion monitoring and yield estimation. However, quantitative relationships between acoustic energy and explosion yields are required for accurate yield estimation. Here, we develop an empirical acoustic source model for chemical explosions from experimental data. The empirical model returns the acoustic pressure waveform for the detonation of 1 kg of trinitrotoluene, which is conventionally used to represent the explosive release of 4.184 MJ of explosion energy. The full-waveform model can be used to predict acoustic signals for an arbitrary yield of a high-explosive detonation based on the standard scaling law and to estimate acoustic energies in a specific frequency range. We evaluate the accuracy of the acoustic source model independently by estimating the yield of other explosive events that are not included in the model development. Statistical characteristics of the model and their implications for the uncertainty quantification of estimated yields are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 2109-2130
Author(s):  
Lauren Bislick

Purpose This study continued Phase I investigation of a modified Phonomotor Treatment (PMT) Program on motor planning in two individuals with apraxia of speech (AOS) and aphasia and, with support from prior work, refined Phase I methodology for treatment intensity and duration, a measure of communicative participation, and the use of effect size benchmarks specific to AOS. Method A single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across behaviors and participants was used to examine acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of treatment effects 8–10 weeks posttreatment. Treatment was distributed 3 days a week, and duration of treatment was specific to each participant (criterion based). Experimental stimuli consisted of target sounds or clusters embedded nonwords and real words, specific to each participants' deficit. Results Findings show improved repetition accuracy for targets in trained nonwords, generalization to targets in untrained nonwords and real words, and maintenance of treatment effects at 10 weeks posttreatment for one participant and more variable outcomes for the other participant. Conclusions Results indicate that a modified version of PMT can promote generalization and maintenance of treatment gains for trained speech targets via a multimodal approach emphasizing repeated exposure and practice. While these results are promising, the frequent co-occurrence of AOS and aphasia warrants a treatment that addresses both motor planning and linguistic deficits. Thus, the application of traditional PMT with participant-specific modifications for AOS embedded into the treatment program may be a more effective approach. Future work will continue to examine and maximize improvements in motor planning, while also treating anomia in aphasia.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Uemura ◽  
Motoyoshi Tanaka ◽  
Shigeya Uejima ◽  
Takafumi Minami ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document