scholarly journals A Ruler To Measure The Universe : Probing Dark Energy with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Padmanabhan
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. García-Aspeitia ◽  
Juan Magaña ◽  
A. Hernández-Almada ◽  
V. Motta

We investigate a brane model based on Randall–Sundrum scenarios with a generic dark energy component. The latter drives the accelerated expansion at late-times of the universe. In this scheme, extra terms are added into Einstein Field equations that are propagated to the Friedmann equations. To constrain the dark energy equation-of-state (EoS) and the brane tension we use observational data with different energy levels (Supernovae Type Ia, [Formula: see text], baryon acoustic oscillations, and cosmic microwave background radiation distance, and a joint analysis) in a background cosmology. Beside EoS being consistent with a cosmological constant at the [Formula: see text] confidence level for each dataset, the baryon acoustic oscillations probe favors an EoS consistent with a quintessence dark energy. Although we found different lower limit bounds on the brane tension for each dataset, being the most restricted for CMB, there is not enough evidence of modifications in the cosmological evolution of the universe by the existence of an extra dimension within observational uncertainties. Nevertheless, these new bounds are complementary to those obtained by other probes like table-top experiments, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, and stellar dynamics. Our results show that a further test of the braneworld model with appropriate correction terms or a profound analysis with perturbations, may be needed to improve the constraints provided by the current data.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (37) ◽  
pp. 3093-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUN WANG

The measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from a galaxy redshift survey provides one of the most promising methods for probing dark energy. In this paper, we clarify the assumptions that go into the forecasts of dark energy constraints from BAO. We show that assuming a constant nP0.2/G2(z) (where P0.2 is the real space galaxy power spectrum at k = 0.2 h/ Mpc and redshift z) gives a good approximation of the observed galaxy number density expected from a realistic flux-limited galaxy redshift survey. We find that assuming nP0.2/G2(z) = 10 gives very similar dark energy constraints to assuming nP0.2 = 3, but the latter corresponds to a galaxy number density larger than ~70% at z = 2. We show how the Figure-of-Merit (FoM) for constraining dark energy depends on the assumed galaxy number density, redshift accuracy, redshift range, survey area, and the systematic errors due to calibration and uncertainties in the theory of nonlinear evolution and galaxy biasing. We find that an additive systematic noise of up to 0.4–0.5% per Δz = 0.1 redshift slice does not lead to significant decrease in the BAO FoM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (14) ◽  
pp. 2030014
Author(s):  
Elcio Abdalla ◽  
Alessandro Marins

The most important problem in fundamental physics is the description of the contents of the Universe. Today, we know that 95% thereof is totally unknown. Two thirds of that amount is the mysterious Dark Energy described in an interesting and important review [E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753]. We briefly extend here the ideas contained in that review including the more general Dark Sector, that is, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, eventually composing a new physical Sector. Understanding the Dark Sector with precision is paramount for us to be able to understand all the other cosmological parameters comprehensively as modifications of the modeling could lead to potential biases of inferred parameters of the model, such as measurements of the Hubble constant and distance indicators such as the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. We discuss several modern methods of observation that can disentangle the different possible descriptions of the Dark Sector. The possible applications of some theoretical developments are also included in this paper as well as a more thorough evaluation of new observational techniques at lower frequencies and gravitational waves.


2009 ◽  
Vol 394 (4) ◽  
pp. 1775-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Xuelei Chen ◽  
Zheng Zheng ◽  
Fengquan Wu ◽  
Pengjie Zhang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 415 (3) ◽  
pp. 2892-2909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Blake ◽  
Tamara Davis ◽  
Gregory B. Poole ◽  
David Parkinson ◽  
Sarah Brough ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document