An Assessment of Gate-to-Gate Environmental Life Cycle Performance of Water-Alternating-Gas CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Permian Basin

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Dilmore
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Skone ◽  
James Littlefield ◽  
Joe Marriott ◽  
Greg Cooney

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Cooney ◽  
James Littlefield ◽  
Joe Marriott ◽  
Matt Jamieson ◽  
Robert E James III PhD ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar G. Hertwich ◽  
Martin Aaberg ◽  
Bhawna Singh ◽  
Anders H. Strømman

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1461-1474
Author(s):  
O. A. Olabode ◽  
V. O. Ogbebor ◽  
E. O. Onyeka ◽  
B. C. Felix

AbstractOil rim reservoirs are characterised with a small thickness relative to their overlying gas caps and underlying aquifers and the development these reservoirs are planned very carefully in order to avoid gas and water coning and maximise oil production. Studies have shown low oil recoveries from water and gas injection, and while foam and water alternating gas injections resulted in positive recoveries, it is viewed that an option of an application of chemical enhanced oil recovery option would be preferable. This paper focuses on the application of chemical enhanced oil recovery to improve production from an oil rim reservoir in Niger Delta. Using Eclipse black oil simulator, the effects of surfactant concentration and injection time and surfactant alternating gas are studied on overall oil recovery. Surfactant injections at start and middle of production resulted in a 3.7 MMstb and 3.6 MMstb at surfactant concentration of 1% vol, respectively. This amounted to a 6.6% and 6.5% increment over the base case of no injection. A case study of surfactant alternating gas at the middle of production gave an oil recovery estimate of 10.7%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93
Author(s):  
Steven Chandra ◽  
Prasandi Abdul Aziz ◽  
Muhammad Raykhan Naufal ◽  
Wijoyo Niti Daton

The most of today's global oil production comes from mature fields. Oil companies and governments are both concerned about increasing oil recovery from aging resources. To maintain oil production, the mature field must apply the Enhanced Oil Recovery method.  water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection is an enhanced oil recovery method designed to improve sweep efficiency during  injection with the injected water to control the mobility of . This study will discuss possible corrosion during  and water injection and the casing load calculation along with the production tubing during the injection phase. The following study also performed a suitable material selection for the best performance injection. This research was conducted by evaluating casing integrity for simulate  water-alternating-gas (WAG) to be applied in the X-well in the Y-field, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Corrosion prediction were performed using Electronic Corrosion Engineer (ECE®) corrosion model and for the strength of tubing which included burst, collapse, and tension of production casing was assessed using Microsoft Excel. This study concluded that for the casing load calculation results in 600 psi of burst pressure, collapse pressure of 2,555.64 psi, and tension of 190,528 lbf. All of these results are still following the K-55 production casing rating. While injecting , the maximum corrosion rate occurs. It has a maximum corrosion rate of 2.02 mm/year and a minimum corrosion rate of 0.36 mm/year. With this value, it is above NORSOK Standard M-001 which is 2 mm/year and needs to be evaluated to prevent the rate to remain stable and not decrease in the following years. To prevent the effect of maximum corrosion rate, the casing material must use a SM13CR (Martensitic Stainless Steel) which is not sour service material.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document