scholarly journals Evaluating Large-Eddy Simulations of Boundary-Layer Cloud Response to Climate Change using MAGIC Observations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Bretherton ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Boundary Layer Cloud ◽  
Layer Cloud ◽  
Cloud Response

scholarly journals Diurnal cycle of the semi–direct effect over marine stratocumulus in large–eddy simulations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross J. Herbert ◽  
Nicolas Bellouin ◽  
Ellie J. Highwood ◽  
Adrian A. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Mixed Boundary ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Stratocumulus Clouds ◽  
Model Setup ◽  
Cloud Response

Abstract. The rapid adjustment, or semi–direct effect, of marine stratocumulus clouds to elevated layers of absorbing aerosols may enhance or dampen the radiative effect of aerosol–radiation interactions. Here we use large eddy simulations to investigate the sensitivity of stratocumulus clouds to the properties of an absorbing aerosol layer located above the inversion layer. The sign of the daily mean semi–direct effect depends on the properties of the aerosol layer, the properties of the boundary layer, and the model setup. Diurnal variations in the cloud response mean that an instantaneous semi–direct effect is unrepresentative of the daily mean, and that observational studies may under– or over–estimate semi–direct effects depending on the observed time of day. The observed role of the distance between the cloud top and the absorbing layer in modulating the strength of the cloud and radiative response is reproduced by the large eddy simulations. Both cloud response and semi–direct effect increase for thinner, denser, layers of absorbing aerosol located nearer the cloud layer. The cloud response is particularly sensitive to the mixing state of the boundary layer: well-mixed boundary layers generally result in a negative daily mean semi–direct effect, and poorly mixed boundary layers result in a positive daily mean semi–direct effect. Properties of the boundary layer and model setup, particularly the sea surface temperature, precipitation, and properties of the air entrained from the free troposphere, also impact the magnitude of the semi–direct effect and the timescale of adjustment. These results suggest that the semi–direct effect simulated by coarse-resolution models may be erroneous because the cloud response is sensitive to small-scale processes, especially the sources and sinks of buoyancy.

scholarly journals Diurnal cycle of the semi-direct effect from a persistent absorbing aerosol layer over marine stratocumulus in large-eddy simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1317-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross J. Herbert ◽  
Nicolas Bellouin ◽  
Ellie J. Highwood ◽  
Adrian A. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Mixed Boundary ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Stratocumulus Clouds ◽  
Model Setup ◽  
Cloud Response

Abstract. The rapid adjustment, or semi-direct effect, of marine stratocumulus clouds to elevated layers of absorbing aerosols may enhance or dampen the radiative effect of aerosol–radiation interactions. Here we use large-eddy simulations to investigate the sensitivity of stratocumulus clouds to the properties of an absorbing aerosol layer located above the inversion layer, with a focus on the location, timing, and strength of the radiative heat perturbation. The sign of the daily mean semi-direct effect depends on the properties and duration of the aerosol layer, the properties of the boundary layer, and the model setup. Our results suggest that the daily mean semi-direct effect is more elusive than previously assessed. We find that the daily mean semi-direct effect is dominated by the distance between the cloud and absorbing aerosol layer. Within the first 24 h the semi-direct effect is positive but remains under 2 W m−2 unless the aerosol layer is directly above the cloud. For longer durations, the daily mean semi-direct effect is consistently negative but weakens by 30 %, 60 %, and 95 % when the distance between the cloud and aerosol layer is 100, 250, and 500 m, respectively. Both the cloud response and semi-direct effect increase for thinner and denser layers of absorbing aerosol. Considerable diurnal variations in the cloud response mean that an instantaneous semi-direct effect is unrepresentative of the daily mean and that observational studies may underestimate or overestimate semi-direct effects depending on the observed time of day. The cloud response is particularly sensitive to the mixing state of the boundary layer: well-mixed boundary layers generally result in a negative daily mean semi-direct effect, and poorly mixed boundary layers result in a positive daily mean semi-direct effect. The properties of the boundary layer and model setup, particularly the sea surface temperature, precipitation, and properties of the air entrained from the free troposphere, also impact the magnitude of the semi-direct effect and the timescale of adjustment. These results suggest that the semi-direct effect simulated by coarse-resolution models may be erroneous because the cloud response is sensitive to small-scale processes, especially the sources and sinks of buoyancy.

scholarly journals Large-eddy simulations of the Northeastern US coastal marine boundary layer

2020 ◽  
Vol 1618 ◽  
pp. 062038
Author(s):  
Lawrence C. Cheung ◽  
Colleen M. Kaul ◽  
Alan S. Hsieh ◽  
Myra L. Blaylock ◽  
Matthew J. Churchfield
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Coastal Marine ◽  
Large Eddy

Boundary Layer, Cloud, and Drizzle Variability in the Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus Regime

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 6191-6214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efthymios Serpetzoglou ◽  
Bruce A. Albrecht ◽  
Pavlos Kollias ◽  
Christopher W. Fairall
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Structure ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Synoptic Conditions ◽  
Southeast Pacific ◽  
Boundary Layer Cloud ◽  
Similar Area ◽  
Earth’S Climate ◽  
Layer Cloud

Abstract The southeast Pacific stratocumulus regime is an important component of the earth’s climate system because of its substantial impact on albedo. Observational studies of this cloud regime have been limited, but during the past 5 yr, a series of cruises with research vessels equipped with in situ and remote sensing systems have provided unprecedented observations of boundary layer cloud and drizzle structures. These cruises started with the East Pacific Investigation of Climate (EPIC) 2001 field experiment, followed by cruises in a similar area in 2003 and 2004 [Pan-American Climate Studies (PACS) Stratus cruises]. The sampling from these three cruises provides a sufficient dataset to study the variability occurring over this region. This study compares observations from the 2004 cruise with those obtained during the previous two cruises. Observations from the ship provide information about boundary layer structure, fractional cloudiness, cloud depth, and drizzle characteristics. This study indicates more strongly decoupled boundary layers during the 2004 cruise than the well-mixed conditions that dominated the cloud and boundary layer structures during the EPIC cruise, and the highly variable conditions—sharp transitions from a solid stratus deck to broken-cloud and clear-sky periods—encountered during PACS Stratus 2003. Diurnal forcing and synoptic conditions are considered to be factors affecting these variations. A statistical evaluation of the macrophysical boundary layer, cloud, and drizzle properties is performed using the 5–6-day periods for which the research vessels remained stationed at the location of 20°S, 85°W during each cruise.

scholarly journals Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Ackerman ◽  
Margreet C. vanZanten ◽  
Bjorn Stevens ◽  
Verica Savic-Jovcic ◽  
Christopher S. Bretherton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Cloud Water ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Entrainment Rate ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Cloud water sedimentation and drizzle in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer are the focus of an intercomparison of large-eddy simulations. The context is an idealized case study of nocturnal stratocumulus under a dry inversion, with embedded pockets of heavily drizzling open cellular convection. Results from 11 groups are used. Two models resolve the size distributions of cloud particles, and the others parameterize cloud water sedimentation and drizzle. For the ensemble of simulations with drizzle and cloud water sedimentation, the mean liquid water path (LWP) is remarkably steady and consistent with the measurements, the mean entrainment rate is at the low end of the measured range, and the ensemble-average maximum vertical wind variance is roughly half that measured. On average, precipitation at the surface and at cloud base is smaller, and the rate of precipitation evaporation greater, than measured. Including drizzle in the simulations reduces convective intensity, increases boundary layer stratification, and decreases LWP for nearly all models. Including cloud water sedimentation substantially decreases entrainment, decreases convective intensity, and increases LWP for most models. In nearly all cases, LWP responds more strongly to cloud water sedimentation than to drizzle. The omission of cloud water sedimentation in simulations is strongly discouraged, regardless of whether or not precipitation is present below cloud base.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document