scholarly journals Remediation of the Acidic Groundwater Impacting the Discharge Canal in D Area

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Gaughan
2005 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 1193-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana R. Warren ◽  
Stephen D. Sebestyen ◽  
Daniel C. Josephson ◽  
Jesse M. Lepak ◽  
Clifford E. Kraft

2001 ◽  
Vol 2001 (2) ◽  
pp. 1431-1434
Author(s):  
Dennis E. Connelly ◽  
Dennis J. McCarthy ◽  
John E. Westerlind

ABSTRACT This paper explores the challenges involved with the recovery of oil from a discharge canal with limited access and high relative currents. In March 1999, a sheen was observed in the cooling water discharge canal of Consolidated Edison's 2.5-million kilowatt generating station in Queens (New York City), New York At the time the sheen was discovered, the entire station had been shut down for several months for a maintenance outage. As the tide rose and fell in the East River, into which the discharge canal emptied, the oil sheen moved in and out of a 1,000-foot long tunnel connecting the generating station to the canal. The major challenges to the recovery and removal of the oil sheen were: (1) the low over head of the discharge tunnel and canal support girders, which prevented getting a skimmer into the tunnel and canal; (2) the high discharge rate of the station's cooling water pump; and (3) skimming the sheen in a 3-to 5-knot current. Consolidated Edison is a member of Clean Harbors Cooperative, L.L.C, which was brought in to remove the sheen. This was accomplished utilizing two JBF Scientific DIP Belt Skimmers, which were set up parallel to the current flow, and deflection booming.


Author(s):  
Emil O. Frind ◽  
Murray D. Wunderly ◽  
Jeffrey G. Bain ◽  
Florian Werner ◽  
David W. Blowes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document