scholarly journals Fission Fragment Yield Data in Support of Advanced Reactor Technology

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hecht
Keyword(s):  
Fission Fragment ◽  
Yield Data ◽  
Reactor Technology ◽  
Fragment Yield

Fission fragment yield distribution in the heavy-mass region from the Pu239 ( nth,f ) reaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. K. Gupta ◽  
D. C. Biswas ◽  
O. Serot ◽  
D. Bernard ◽  
O. Litaize ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fission Fragment ◽  
Mass Region ◽  
Yield Distribution ◽  
Fragment Yield

Fission Fragment Yield, Cross Section and Prompt Neutron and Gamma Emission Data from Actinide Isotopes

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.-J. Hambsch ◽  
S. Oberstedt ◽  
A. Al-Adili ◽  
T. Brys ◽  
R. Billnert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Fission Fragment ◽  
Prompt Neutron ◽  
Gamma Emission ◽  
Emission Data ◽  
Fragment Yield

scholarly journals Three Exit Channels in the Fission of 235U(n, f)

1987 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 786-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-H. Knitter ◽  
F.-J. Hambsch ◽  
C. Budtz-Jørgensen ◽  
J. P. Theobald
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Coordinate System ◽  
Thermal Neutron ◽  
Fission Fragment ◽  
Channel Model ◽  
Total Kinetic Energy ◽  
Fragment Mass ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Induced Fission ◽  
Fragment Yield

A formula for the fission fragment yield area in the coordinate system of the fragment total kinetic energy and of the fragment mass is presented. It was deduced along the lines of the multiexit- channel model of fission elaborated by Brosa, Grossmann and Müller. This formula was fitted to the fragment mass-, average total kinetic energy-, and variance distributions of the thermal neutron induced fission of 235U. The obtained parameters are compared with the theoretical predictions. Further improvements of the fragment yield representation are discussed.

EFFECT OF SOWING DATE ON GRAIN YIELD OF CRAB GRASS

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-297
Author(s):  
S. O. Bakare ◽  
M. G. M. Kolo ◽  
J. A. Oladiran
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Sowing Date ◽  
Yield Data ◽  
Significant Interaction Effect ◽  
Sowing Dates

There was a significant interaction effect between the variety and the sowing date for the number of productive tillers, indicating that the response to sowing date varied with the variety. A significant reduction in the number of productive tillers became evident when sowing was delayed till 26 June in the straggling variety as compared to sowing dates in May. Lower numbers of productive tillers were also recorded when the sowing of the erect variety was further delayed till 10 July. The grain yield data showed that it is not advisable to sow the straggling variety later than 12 June, while sowing may continue till about 26 June for the erect variety in the study area.

Utilizing Grain Yield Data from Wheat Demonstration Plots

1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Ben-Hui ◽  
J. P. Shroyer ◽  
T. S. Cox
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Yield Data
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document