scholarly journals Assessment of NHTSA’s Report “Relationships Between Fatality Risk, Mass, and Footprint in Model Year 2003-2010 Passenger Cars and LTVs”

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Wenzel
Keyword(s):  
Passenger Cars ◽  
Fatality Risk ◽  
Model Year

Relative fatality risk in different seating positions versus car model year

1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Evans ◽  
Michael C. Frick
Keyword(s):  
Fatality Risk ◽  
Car Model ◽  
Model Year

Roof Strength Survey of Production Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Sigel ◽  
Jack Bish ◽  
Terence Honikman ◽  
Donald Friedman ◽  
Carl E. Nash
Keyword(s):  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Hydraulic Cylinder ◽  
Vehicle Safety ◽  
Safety Standard ◽  
Passenger Cars ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Light Trucks ◽  
Motor Vehicle Safety ◽  
Roof Strength ◽  
Model Year

We have developed and used a repeatable roof strength survey tool to assess the force resistance characteristics of over 50 passenger car, SUV, pickup, and van roofs. In a rollover, the initial roof-to-ground contact typically fractures and/or separates the vehicle’s bonded windshield. Subsequent trailing-side roof-to-ground impacts apply lateral forces to the roof and its support pillars. In 1971 the National Highway Safety Bureau (NHSB) recognized this rollover sequence and proposed a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) that tested both sides of the roof in sequence. Our repeatable roof strength survey tool uses a hydraulic cylinder to pull the upper A-pillar, roof rail, windshield header intersection toward the rear of the opposite front door sill imitating the proposed 1971 test, but at a more realistic roll angle. It is used first on one side of the vehicle with the windshield intact before being repositioned on the other side after the fractured and separated windshield is removed and the test repeated. Tests on three vehicles of the same make, model, and model year have validated the repeatability of the test and protocol. Results from all the vehicles demonstrate that in the first side test, the strength of the roof is typically about half the strength recorded in a typical FMVSS 216 test, a further decrease in force resistance occurs after the windshield has failed, and similar elastic restoration of the deformed structure occurs on both sides.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document