scholarly journals Multi-fuel reformers for fuel cells used in transportation: Assessment of hydrogen storage technologies. Phase 2: Final report

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Hydrogen Storage ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Storage Technologies

Transmission Reinforcements in the Central American Power System Phase 2 - Final report

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo A. Elizondo ◽  
Nader A. Samaan ◽  
Mallikarjuna R. Vallem ◽  
Yuri V. Makarov ◽  
Bharat Vyakaranam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power System ◽  
Central American ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
American Power ◽  
System Phase

A Comparative Study of Hydrogen Storage and Hydrocarbon Fuel Processing for Automotive Fuel Cells

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Kazemiabnavi ◽  
Aneet Soundararaj ◽  
Haniyeh Zamani ◽  
Bjoern Scharf ◽  
Priya Thyagarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Fuel Cell ◽  
Hydrogen Storage ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emission ◽  
Hydrogen Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cost ◽  
Gas Emission ◽  
Fuel Processing ◽  
Gasoline Vehicles

In recent years, there has been increased interest in fuel cells as a promising energy storage technology. The environmental impacts due to the extensive fossil fuel consumption is becoming increasingly important as greenhouse gas (GHG) levels in the atmosphere continue to rise rapidly. Furthermore, fuel cell efficiencies are not limited by the Carnot limit, a major thermodynamic limit for power plants and internal combustion engines. Therefore, hydrogen fuel cells could provide a long-term solution to the automotive industry, in its search for alternate propulsion systems. Two most important methods for hydrogen delivery to fuel cells used for vehicle propulsion were evaluated in this study, which are fuel processing and hydrogen storage. Moreover, the average fuel cost and the greenhouse gas emission for hydrogen fuel cell (H2 FCV) and gasoline fuel cell (GFCV) vehicles are compared to that of a regular gasoline vehicle based on the Argonne National Lab’s GREET model. The results show that the average fuel cost per 100 miles for a H2 FCV can be up to 57% lower than that of regular gasoline vehicles. Moreover, the obtained results confirm that the well to wheel greenhouse gas emission of both H2 FCV and GFCV is significantly less than that of regular gasoline vehicles. Furthermore, the investment return period for hydrogen storage techniques are compared to fuel processing methods. A qualitative safety and infrastructure dependency comparison of hydrogen storage and fuel processing methods is also presented.

scholarly journals Hydrogen Storage Technologies for Smart Grid Applications

Challenges ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Lazarou ◽  
Sofoklis Makridis
Keyword(s):  
Smart Grid ◽  
Hydrogen Storage ◽  
Grid Applications ◽  
Storage Technologies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document