scholarly journals Transportation Energy Futures Series: Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Expansion: Costs, Resources, Production Capacity, and Retail Availability for Low-Carbon Scenarios

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc W. Melaina ◽  
Garvin Heath ◽  
Debra Sandor ◽  
Darlene Steward ◽  
Laura Vimmerstedt ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Brogan ◽  
Andreas E. Aeppli ◽  
Daniel F. Beagan ◽  
Austin Brown ◽  
Michael J. Fischer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Brogan ◽  
A. E. Aeppli ◽  
D. F. Brown ◽  
M. J. Fischer ◽  
L. R. Grenzeback ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Patterson ◽  
David Greene ◽  
Elyse Steiner ◽  
Steve Plotkin ◽  
Margaret Singh ◽  
...  

Urban Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 004209802110059
Author(s):  
Leslie Quitzow ◽  
Friederike Rohde

Current imaginaries of urban smart grid technologies are painting attractive pictures of the kinds of energy futures that are desirable and attainable in cities. Making claims about the future city, the socio-technical imaginaries related to smart grid developments unfold the power to guide urban energy policymaking and implementation practices. This paper analyses how urban smart grid futures are being imagined and co-produced in the city of Berlin, Germany. It explores these imaginaries to show how the politics of Berlin’s urban energy transition are being driven by techno-optimistic visions of the city’s digital modernisation and its ambitions to become a ‘smart city’. The analysis is based on a discourse analysis of relevant urban policy and other documents, as well as interviews with key stakeholders from Berlin’s energy, ICT and urban development sectors, including key experts from three urban laboratories for smart grid development and implementation in the city. It identifies three dominant imaginaries that depict urban smart grid technologies as (a) environmental solution, (b) economic imperative and (c) exciting experimental challenge. The paper concludes that dominant imaginaries of smart grid technologies in the city are grounded in a techno-optimistic approach to urban development that are foreclosing more subtle alternatives or perhaps more radical change towards low-carbon energy systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 297 ◽  
pp. 126651
Author(s):  
Hui Xing ◽  
Charles Stuart ◽  
Stephen Spence ◽  
Hua Chen

1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 375-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Sperling ◽  
M A DeLuchi

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-641
Author(s):  
Les Levidow ◽  
Sujatha Raman

To implement EU climate policy, the UK’s New Labour government (1997–2010) elaborated an ecomodernist policy framework. It promoted technological innovation to provide low-carbon renewable energy, especially by treating waste as a resource. This framework discursively accommodated rival sociotechnical imaginaries, understood as visions of feasible and desirable futures available through technoscientific development. According to the dominant imaginary, techno-market fixes stimulate low-carbon technologies by making current centralized systems more resource-efficient (as promoted by industry incumbents). According to the alternative eco-localization imaginary, a shift to low-carbon systems should instead localize resource flows, output uses and institutional responsibility (as promoted by civil society groups). The UK government policy framework gained political authority by accommodating both imaginaries. As we show by drawing on three case studies, the realization of both imaginaries depended on institutional changes and material-economic resources of distinctive kinds. In practice, financial incentives drove technological design towards trajectories that favour the dominant sociotechnical imaginary, while marginalizing the eco-localization imaginary and its environmental benefits. The ecomodernist policy framework relegates responsibility to anonymous markets, thus displacing public accountability of the state and industry. These dynamics indicate the need for STS research on how alternative sociotechnical imaginaries mobilize support for their realization, rather than be absorbed into the dominant imaginary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document