scholarly journals Verification of MCNP5-1.60 and MCNP6-Beta-2 for Criticality Safety Applications

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest B. Brown ◽  
Brian C. Kiedrowski ◽  
Jeffrey S. Bull

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest B. Brown ◽  
Michael Evan Rising ◽  
Jennifer Louise Alwin

2021 ◽  
Vol 247 ◽  
pp. 17005
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Bowen ◽  
Travis M. Greene

The ANSI/ANS-8.1 standard, “Safety Standard for Operations with Fissionable Materials Outside Reactors,” has been available since 1964 as ASA N6.1-1964. In 1969, this standard was revised as ANSI N16.1-1969, “Nuclear Criticality Safety in Operations with Fissionable Materials Outside Reactors.” This version of the standard includes a variety of subcritical limits (SCLs) for uniform aqueous solutions and metals containing fissile nuclides for 233U, 235U, and 239Pu. Furthermore, SCLs are also included for uranium-water lattices. In the 1983 version of ANSI/ANS-8.1 (a revision of ANSI N16.1-1975), the suite of SCLs in the standard expanded to include 235U enrichment limits for homogeneous uranium-water mixtures and dry/damp oxides, uniform aqueous solutions of low-enriched uranium, and uniform aqueous mixtures of Pu(NO3)4 containing 240Pu, in addition to the SCLs included in ANSI N16.1-1969. The SCLs have changed little in subsequent revisions (ANSI/ANS-8.1-1998 and ANSI/ANS-8.1-2014). The ANSI/ANS-8.1-2014 standard is currently being revised to include new SCLs (uranium metal and compounds with enrichments up to 20 wt. % 235U) and possible updates to the current SCLs already in the standard, although these SCLs will not be available to the nuclear criticality safety community for a number of years. The bases for these SCLs were documented in journal articles such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, and the American Nuclear Society’s meeting transactions; however, the bases were ambiguous enough that sites and regulators in the United States are reluctant to endorse them for safety purposes. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a comparison study for the SCLs in the ANSI/ANS-8.1-2014 standard using modern codes and cross sections (SCALE/ENDF/B-VIII) to provide some assurance about their quality (bias and bias uncertainty) for use in nuclear criticality safety applications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 18007
Author(s):  
John Darrell Bess ◽  
Tatiana Ivanova ◽  
J. Blair Briggs

The contributions to the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) was last presented to the international nuclear data community at ND2016. Since ND2016, integral benchmark data that are available for nuclear data testing has continued to increase. The 2018 edition of the International Handbook of Evaluated Criti-cality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook) now contains 574 evaluations with benchmark specifications for 4,916 critical, near-critical, or subcritical configurations, 45 criticality alarm placement/shielding configuration with multiple dose points apiece, and 215 configurations that have been categorized as fundamental physics measurements that are relevant to criticality safety applications. The 2018 edition of the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhEP Handbook) contains data from 159 different experimental series that were performed at 54 different nuclear facilities. Currently 156 of the 159 evaluations are published as approved benchmarks with the remaining three evaluations published as drafts. Measurements found in the IRPhEP Handbook include criticality, buckling and extrapolation length, spectral characteristics, reactivity effects, reactivity coefficients, kinetics, reaction-rate distributions, power distributions, isotopic compositions, and/or other miscellaneous types of measurements for various types of reactor systems. Additional benchmark evaluations will be included in the 2019 editions of these handbooks. These handbooks continue to represent the standard for neutronics benchmark experiment evaluation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document