scholarly journals OECD 2-D Core Concrete Interaction (CCI) tests : CCI-2 test plan, Rev. 0 January 31, 2004.

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Farmer ◽  
D. J. Kilsdonk ◽  
S. Lomperski ◽  
R. W. Aeschlimann ◽  
S. Basu
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Farmer ◽  
D. J. Kilsdonk ◽  
S. Lomperski ◽  
R. W. Aeschlimann
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Farmer ◽  
D. J. Kilsdonk ◽  
S. Lomperski ◽  
R. W. Aeschlimann
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 849-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
PY Chevalier ◽  
E Fischer ◽  
B Cheynet ◽  
A Rivet ◽  
G Cenerino

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Krohman ◽  
S. Smith ◽  
K. Stone ◽  
R. Knudston
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lakshmi Thangasamy ◽  
◽  
Gunasekaran Kandasamy ◽  

Many researches on double skin sandwich having top and bottom steel plates and in between concrete core called as steel-concrete-steel (SCS) were carried out by them on this SCS type using with different materials. Yet, use of coconut shell concrete (CSC) as a core material on this SCS form construction and their results are very limited. Study investigated to use j-hook shear studs under flexure in the concept of steel-concrete-steel (SCS) in which the core concrete was CSC. To compare the results of CSC, the conventional concrete (CC) was also considered. To study the effect of quarry dust (QD) in its place of river sand (RS) was also taken. Hence four different mixes two without QD and two with QD both in CC and CSC was considered. The problem statement is to examine about partial and fully composite, moment capacity, deflection and ductility properties of CSC used SCS form of construction. Core concrete strength and the j-hook shear studs used are influences the moment carrying capacity of the SCS beams. Use of QD in its place of RS enhances the strength of concrete produced. Deflections predicted theoretically were compared with experimental results. The SCS beams showed good ductility behavior.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Azarian

Abstract As counterfeiting techniques and processes grow in sophistication, the methods needed to detect these parts must keep pace. This has the unfortunate effect of raising the costs associated with managing this risk. In order to ensure that the resources devoted to counterfeit detection are commensurate with the potential effects and likelihood of counterfeit part usage in a particular application, a risk based methodology has been adopted for testing of electrical, electronic, and electromechanical (EEE) parts by the SAE AS6171 set of standards. This paper provides an overview of the risk assessment methodology employed within AS6171 to determine the testing that should be utilized to manage the risk associated with the use of a part. A scenario is constructed as a case study to illustrate how multiple solutions exist to address the risk for a particular situation, and the choice of any specific test plan can be made on the basis of practical considerations, such as cost, time, or the availability of particular test equipment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document