scholarly journals Audio-Textual Classification System Design for Arabic News Videos

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-212
Author(s):  
Amal Dandashi ◽  
◽  
Jihad Jihad Al Ja’am ◽  
Sebti Foufou ◽  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0196251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungmo Ahn ◽  
JaeYeon Park ◽  
Donghwan Park ◽  
Jeongyeup Paek ◽  
JeongGil Ko

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 51-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Gi Kim ◽  
Won-Kyun Joo ◽  
Eunjin Kim ◽  
Yong-Ho Lee

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bullard

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of warrant in daily classification design in general and in negotiating disparate classification goals in particular. Design/methodology/approach This paper synthesizes classification research on forms of warrant and uses examples of classification decisions from ethnographic engagement with designers to illustrate how forms of warrant interact in daily classification decisions. Findings Different forms of warrant, though associated with incompatible theories of classification design, coexist in daily classification decisions. A secondary warrant might be employed to augment the primary warrant of a system, such as to decide among equally valid terms, or to overturn a decision based on the primary warrant, such as when ethical impacts are prioritized above user preference. Research limitations/implications This paper calls for empirical research using the application of warrant as an object of analysis. Originality/value The paper connects a ubiquitous and observable element of classification design – the application of warrant – to longstanding divisions in classification theory. This paper demonstrates how the analysis of daily classification design can illuminate the interaction between disparate philosophies of classification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document