scholarly journals Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy of ADHD

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Vladimirovna Dubatova ◽  
Andrey Viktorovich Antsyborov

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a widespread, severe neurobiological disorder that occurs in childhood and adolescence and has a negative impact on social functioning in adulthood. Currently, there are several strategies for the treatment of ADHD including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic interventions. Due to the expansion of the range of available drugs, for practical doctors to choose the tactics of therapy and to set priorities in the treatment process becomes more challenging. The aim of this review is to systematize the evidence-based literature on the treatment of ADHD, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine. The review considers the main mechanisms of action of the drugs used, the role of non-drug methods of treatment, as well as drugs that are not widely used. The most relevant treatment approaches, which have been proven to be effective and safe, are discussed.

ASJ. ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (43) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
S. Тemirbolatova ◽  
A. Shogenov

The paper considers the features of modern evidence-based medicine, its role and place in modern clinical practice, the role of assessing the effectiveness of drug therapy, the principles of conducting clinical trials of drugs. The results obtained will find wide application in the choice of methods of treatment and rehabilitation of patients in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, which will contribute to the development of this branch of medicine. Introduced modern scientific data into practice, which includes 5 key skills: study of questions and problems, with a detailed detailed answer to them, to conclude a method of treating a patient, a conservative approach or the degree of effectiveness of surgery; a detailed analysis of electronic literature of the corresponding type and level of evidence; selection of research methods and assessment of evidence of their necessity; the ability to implement the final results, and use them in the process of treating patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Wilffert ◽  
◽  
Jesse Swen ◽  
Hans Mulder ◽  
Daan Touw ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Olha Puzanovа

The objective: was to study the international experience of evidence based preventive medicine development as well as to estimate its perspectives in Ukraine. Patients and methods. Main principles and methods of scientific knowledge and research have been used including universal ones, methods of systemic approach, quantitative and qualitative information analysis, classification and systematization of theoretical and empirical data, hystorical and logical methods, health statistics as well). In total 529 scientific information sources have been studied, particularly a number of evidence based medicine (EBM) computer databases, special task forces recommendations and Cochrane reviews on prevention, Register of medical and technological documents for health care standards in Ukraine et al. Results. The contribution of foreign scientific schools in the development of EBM has been determined, as well as the crucial role of scientific works carried out in the US and Great Britain in 1930–80s as to the development of evidence based preventive medicine. The international experience of the development and functioning of evidence based practice centers’ and special task forces on prevention has been summarized, as the experience of the development and implementation of recommendations on prevention in primary health care (PHC) in high income countries acceptable for Ukraine. The concept of evidence based prevention has been first proposed. It is revealed, that EBM implementation in Europe has been prioritized in both the field of infectious diseases prevention and PHC, while there are both the development of differentiated evidence based prevention and early evidence based diagnosis in PHC in the US. Conclusion. The results proved importance of taking into consideration of international experience while evidence based PHC is being developed as a priority in Ukraine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Z. Goldenberg ◽  
Erica B. Oberg ◽  
Jane Guiltinan ◽  
Rachelle L. McCarty

Author(s):  
Natalia A. Vyatkina

The term "evidence-based medicine" is being increasingly used by various sources of information today, and becomes a discussion subject of professional communities and ordinary citizens. Apart from a brief insight into the origin and development of evidence-based medicine in the world and in Russia, the article deals with the anthropological analysis of the attitudes of the modern Russian physicians and patients towards both the understanding of the term and the current status, prospects and possible risks of the development of this discipline in our country. The views of respondents about the role of pharmaceutical companies, the state and the balance between the development and implementation of clinical guidelines and individual cases are considered. The article presents the arguments of patients about whether there is still a "physician blessed by God" and whether it is important for them that the person who they address for help works in the paradigm of evidence-based medicine. Physicians question whether healing itself is still an art, or evidence-based medicine has finally turned it into a business and well-organized mechanism, which could protect them from criminal prosecution in a critical situation.


Modern urology has been at the forefront of evidence-based medicine, with the extracorporeal lithotripter acting a prime example of the development of a new technique from laboratory to patient. Evidence-based innovations in urology are not confined to minimally invasive surgery, and, as a result, today’s urologists have the benefit of extensive anatomical knowledge of the pelvis, urinary sphincter, and neurovascular bundles. The emergence of exciting technological innovations, such as laser and robotic surgery, continues to attest to the role of evidence-based practice in urology. When appropriately interpreted, the use of evidence in this chapter provides a basis for ensuring that further developments can positively benefit the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document