Co-removal of hexavalent chromium during copper precipitation

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sun ◽  
J.-C. Huang

In our recent study using the nucleated precipitation technology to treat plating wastewater, it was found that about one half of hexavalent chromium was co-removed with copper, nickel and zinc. Since hexavalent chromium could not react with either hydroxide or carbonate to from precipitates, this study was undertaken to evaluate the mechanism(s) involved in the chromium co-removal. Batch tests were conducted with synthetic solutions containing either only copper or both copper and hexavalent chromium. Metal precipitation was induced by adding Na2CO3 to different pH, and the quantitative removal of copper and chromium was determined. Besides, the [Cr]/[Cu] molar ratio of produced precipitates were also assessed in conjunction with the EDAX analysis to determine their compositions. Experimental results indicate that for pure copper solution, precipitation begins at pH 6.0, and completes at pH 7.0. The chemical forms of the precipitates are copper carbonates [CuCO3.Cu(OH)2 and CuCO3.2Cu(OH)2]. On the other hand, in a bi-metal solution of copper plus chromium, precipitation of copper begins at about pH 5.0, and copper precipitation is always accompanied by some chromium removal. From the removal stoichiometry of the two metals, it is found that at low pH, the co-removal is a result of “co-precipitation” which results in the formation of CuCrO4 crystallites. Once such crystallites are formed, they provide a heterogeneous environment which enhances an early formation of copper carbonate at a lower pH (below 5.5). It is further found that once copper carbonate precipitates are produced, the remaining soluble will precipitate in such form, and at this stage further removal of copper is no longer accompanied by additional chromium removal. The test data also reflect that the produced copper carbonates are positively charged, as verified by zeta potential measurement, at pH below 7.5. Thus they are able to adsorb some anionic chromium (existing as chromate) through electrostatic attraction and/or inorganic ligand exchange. At pH of 6 to 10, the extent of adsorption decreases with increasing pH, and the adsorption capacity seems to coincide with the progressive reduction of positive zeta potentials of the precipitated particles.

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Sun ◽  
J.C. Huang

A systematic study was conducted to assess the mechanisms involved in the co-removal of hexavalent chromium during chemical precipitation of divalent copper. Batch tests were used to assess the precipitation phenomena in both pure copper solutions and also mixed copper-Cr(VI) solutions with progressive addition of sodium carbonate to increase pH and induce precipitation. It was found that the coremoval of Cr(VI) was caused by two distinct mechanisms: coprecipitation of copper with Cr(VI) at pH 5.0 to 5.2, leading to the formation of CuCrO4 precipitates. Once the fine crystallites of CuCrO4 were formed, the test solution became heterogeneous and this accelerated the production of copper-carbonate precipitates, mainly in the form of CuCO3·Cu(OH)2, at pH 5.2 to 6.2. The latter precipitates were negatively charged at pH below 7.5, and thus they were able to adsorb a considerable amount of the remaining chromate ions [HCrO4- and CrO42-]. The extent of adsorption depended on both pH and surface loading. Besides electrostatic attraction, ligand exchange was also found to play some role. Maximum adsorption occurred at pH 6.5. When pH was raised to 10.0, approximately 25-30% of the adsorbed chromium could become desorbed due to a surface charge reversal on the adsorbent.


RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
pp. 7576-7590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shisuo Fan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Jun Tang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  

A tea waste/Fe3O4composite was prepared through chemical co-precipitation approach and was used for Cr(vi) removal, involving an adsorption-coupled reduction mechanism.


Chemosphere ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1003-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Mei Sun ◽  
Xin-Hua Zhao ◽  
Ju-Chang Huang

Author(s):  
Thais Eduarda Abilio ◽  
Beatriz Caliman Soares ◽  
Julia Cristina José ◽  
Priscila Aparecida Milani ◽  
Geórgia Labuto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 514-522
Author(s):  
Raja Norimie Raja Sulaiman ◽  
Norul Fatiha Mohd Noah ◽  
Norasikin Othman ◽  
Norela Jusoh ◽  
Muhammad Bukhari Rosly

Author(s):  
Buyan-Ulzii Battulga ◽  
Tungalagtamir Bold ◽  
Enkhsaruul Byambajav

AbstractNi based catalysts supported on γ-Al2O3 that was unpromoted (Ni/γAl2O3) or promoted (Ni–Fe/γAl2O3, Ni–Co/γAl2O3, and Ni–Fe–Co/γAl2O3) were prepared using by the impregnation – co-precipitation method. Their catalytic performances for CO methanation were studied at 3 atm with a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 3000 ml/g/h of syngas with a molar ratio of H2/CO = 3 and in the temperature range between 130 and 350 °C. All promoters could improve nickel distribution, and decreased its particle sizes. It was found that the Ni–Co/γAl2O3 catalyst showed the highest catalytic performance for CO methanation in a low temperature range (<250 °C). The temperatures for the 20% CO conversion over Ni–Co/γAl2O3, Ni–Fe/γAl2O3, Ni–Fe–Co/γAl2O3 and Ni/γAl2O3 catalysts were 205, 253, 263 and 270 °C, respectively. The improved catalyst distribution by the addition of cobalt promoter caused the formation of β type nickel species which had an appropriate interacting strength with alumina support in the Ni–Co/γAl2O3. Though an addition of iron promoter improved catalyst distribution, the methane selectivity was lowered due to acceleration of both CO methanation and WGS reaction with the Ni–Fe/γAl2O3. Moreover, it was found that there was no synergetic effect from the binary Fe–Co promotors in the Ni–Fe–Co/γAl2O3 on catalytic activity for CO methanation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document