Microbial storage products, biomass density, and settling properties of enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Schuler ◽  
D. Jenkins ◽  
P. Ronen
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biomass Density ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Storage Products ◽  
Biological Phosphorus

The relationships between bacterial storage products, density, and settling characteristics were determined in a laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system. Both long-term and single anaerobic-aerobic cycle variations in these properties were studied. Increased polyphosphate (PP) content of the biomass during long-term operation resulted in improved sludge volume index (SVI) values. End-aerobic phase (after phosphate (P) uptake) values were consistently lower than end-anaerobic phase (after P release) values. Neither filamentous nor slime bulking were evident by microscopic observations. Biomass density increased at a rate of 1.2 mg/L per each 1% increase in biomass P content. End-aerobic phase samples had an average 25% higher buoyant density than end-anaerobic phase samples, which was attributed to aerobic P uptake. Biomass density was negatively correlated with SVI values, and SVI values increased sharply at low biomass density. A mathematical model developed by Mas et al. (1985) was modified to predict total cell density based on literature values of PP, glycogen (GLY), and poly-b-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) densities. Model predictions were in good agreement with experimental results, although improved measurement of PP density is required to improve model predictions.

An enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) control strategy for sequencing batch reactors (SBRs)

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Y. Dassanayake ◽  
R. L. Irvine
Keyword(s):  
Control Strategy ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Batch Reactor ◽  
Past Research ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Batch Reactors ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Aeration Time ◽  
Biological Phosphorus

A control strategy was developed for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) in a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Unlike past research that focused on maximizing polyhdroxyalkanoate (PHA) formation during the anaerobic period, this study investigated some of the factors that govern aerobic PHA dynamics and its efficient regulation during phosphate (P) uptake. Influent COD, influent P, and the time for aeration were critical factors that governed PHA use and P uptake during aerated react. Unnecessary PHA oxidation (i.e., in the absence of extracellular P) occurred if the time for aerated react exceeded the time required for P uptake. By adjusting the aeration time to that required for P uptake, residual PHA was sustained in the SBR and excess phosphate uptake reaction potential (PRP) was generated for use during transient influent excursions in P. Unlike space oriented systems, the time for react is simply adjusted in the SBR. Because residual PHA is easily maintained once achieved, high influent COD events can be harnessed to increase or sustain excess PRP for management of expected variations in influent P.

Distributed microbial state effects on competitionin enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Schuler
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Storage Product ◽  
Distributed Approach ◽  
Average System ◽  
Storage Products ◽  
Profile Characteristics ◽  
Polyphosphate Accumulating Organisms ◽  
Biological Phosphorus

Computer simulation of activated sludge population dynamics is a useful tool in process design, operation, and troubleshooting, but currently available programs rely on the assumption of “lumped,” or average, system characteristics in each reactor, such as microbial storage product contents. In reality, the states of individual bacteria are likely to vary due to variable residence times in reactors with completely mixed hydraulics. Earlier work by the present author introduced the MATLAB-based distributed state simulation program, Dissimulator 1.0, and demonstrated that distributed states may be particularly important in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems, which rely on the cycling of bacteria through anaerobic and aerobic reactors to select for a population accumulating multiple microbial storage products. This paper explores the relationships between distributed state profiles, variable anaerobic and aerobic SRTs, and the process rates predicted by lumped and distributed approaches. Consistent with previous results, the lumped approach consistently predicted better EBPR performance than did the distributed approach. The primary reason for this was the presence of large fractions of polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) with depleted microbial storage product contents, which led to overestimation of process rates by the lumped approach. Distributed and lumped predictions were therefore most similar when microbial storage product depletion was minimal. The effects of variable anaerobic and aerobic SRTs on distributed profile characteristics and process rates are presented. This work demonstrated that lumped assumptions may overestimate EBPR performance, and the degree of this error is a function of the distributed state profile characteristics such as the degree to which fractions of the biomass contain depleted microbial storage product contents.

Uncertainty and variability in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) stoichiometry: consequences for process modelling and optimization

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1793-1800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight Houweling ◽  
Yves Comeau ◽  
Imre Takács ◽  
Peter Dold
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Feed Composition ◽  
P Limitation ◽  
Polyphosphate Accumulating Organisms ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

The overall potential for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) in the activated sludge process is constrained by the availability of volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The efficiency with which polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) use these VFAs for P-removal, however, is determined by the stoichiometric ratios governing their anaerobic and aerobic metabolism. While changes in anaerobic stoichiometry due to environmental conditions do affect EBPR performance to a certain degree, model-based analyses indicate that variability in aerobic stoichiometry has the greatest impact. Long-term deterioration in EBPR performance in an experimental SBR system undergoing P-limitation can be predicted as the consequence of competition between PAOs and GAOs. However, the observed rapid decrease in P-release after the change in feed composition is not consistent with a gradual shift in population.

Membrane bioreactor configurations for enhanced biological phosphorus removal

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Adam ◽  
M. Kraume ◽  
R. Gnirss ◽  
B. Lesjean
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Raw Water ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
N Removal ◽  
P Content ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

A membrane bioreactor (MBR) bench-scale plant (210 L) was operated under two different enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) configurations, characterised by pre- and postdenitrification mode. Both configurations were operated at 15 d SRT in parallel to a conventional WWTP and fed with degritted raw water. Effluent PT-concentrations were very stable and low between 0.05-0.15 mg/L for both configurations at sludge P-contents of 2-3%P/TS. In contrast to aerobic P-uptake with postdenitrification anoxic P-uptake clearly dominated in the pre-denitrification configuration. N-removal was surprisingly high with up to 96% in the post-denitrification system without resorting to any carbon addition. During P-spiking (influent: -­40 mgP/L) the P-content increased up to 6-7.5%P/TS. However, a significant amount of P-removal was due to adsorption and precipitation.

Density separation and molecular methods to characterize enhanced biological phosphorus removal system populations

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Schuler ◽  
M. Onuki ◽  
H. Satoh ◽  
T. Mino
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
High Density ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Density Fractions ◽  
Density Separation ◽  
Storage Products ◽  
Biological Phosphorus

A novel approach to the identification of microorganisms that accumulate high density microbial storage products based on density separation, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and DNA sequencing was developed and applied to bench and pilot scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems. Polyphosphate (PP), glycogen, and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), are all of higher density than a typical bacterial cell. PP-accumulating organisms (PAOs), the organisms responsible for EBPR, accumulate all three of these storage products. Density separation in a homogenous solution of Percoll produced a high-density biomass fraction with a relatively high concentration of PAOs, as determined by Neisser staining. DNA was extracted from these fractions, amplified, and separated by DGGE. DGGE profiles demonstrated some bacterial strains were present at a greater concentration in the high density fractions than in low density fractions. These strains were considered PAO candidates. 5 of 12 PAO candidates from high density fractions were γ Proteobacteria and only 1 was a β Proteobacterium. 2 PAO candidates were most similar to recently identified γ Proteobacteria sequences obtained by DGGE analysis of a deteriorated benchtop EBPR system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document