scholarly journals Precision of raw and bias-adjusted satellite precipitation estimations (TRMM, IMERG, CMORPH, and PERSIANN) over extreme flood events: case study in Langat river basin, Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
pp. 322-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Zhen Xiang Soo ◽  
Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar ◽  
Sai Hin Lai ◽  
Faridah Othman ◽  
Ahmed Elshafie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Extreme Flood ◽  
Langat River ◽  
Alternative Means ◽  
Local Intensity ◽  
Peak Streamflow ◽  
Intensity Scaling

Abstract Although satellite precipitation products (SPPs) increasingly provide an alternative means to ground-based observations, these estimations exhibit large systematic and random errors which may cause large uncertainties in hydrologic modeling. Three approaches of bias correction (BC), i.e. linear scaling (LS), local intensity scaling (LOCI), and power transformation (PT), were applied on four SPPs (TRMM, IMERG, CMORPH, and PERSIANN) during 2014/2015 extreme floods in Langat river basin, and the performance in terms of rainfall and streamflow were investigated. The results show that the original TRMM had a potential to predict the peak streamflow although CMORPH show the best performance in general. After performing BC, it is found that the LS-IMERG and LOCI-TRMM show the best performance at both rainfall and streamflow analysis. Generally, it is indicated that the current SPP estimations are still imperfect for any hydrological applications. Cross validation of different datasets is required to avoid the calibration effects of datasets.

scholarly journals Evaluation of bias-adjusted satellite precipitation estimations for extreme flood events in Langat river basin, Malaysia

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Zhen Xiang Soo ◽  
Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar ◽  
Sai Hin Lai ◽  
Faridah Othman ◽  
Ahmed Elshafie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
Rainfall Threshold ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Northeast Monsoon ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Extreme Floods ◽  
Extreme Flood ◽  
Langat River

Abstract Even though satellite precipitation products have received an increasing amount of attention in hydrology and meteorology, their estimations are prone to bias. This study investigates the three approaches of bias correction, i.e., linear scaling (LS), local intensity scaling (LOCI) and power transformation (PT), on the three advanced satellite precipitation products (SPPs), i.e., CMORPH, TRMM and PERSIANN over the Langat river basin, Malaysia by focusing on five selected extreme floods due to northeast monsoon season. Results found the LS scheme was able to match the mean precipitation of every SPP but does not correct standard deviation (SD) or coefficient of variation (CV) of the estimations regardless of extreme floods selected. For LOCI scheme, only TRMM and CMORPH estimations in certain floods have showed some improvement in their results. This might be due to the rainfall threshold set in correcting process. PT scheme was found to be the best method as it improved most of the statistical performances as well as the rainfall distribution of the floods. Sensitivity of the parameters used in the bias correction is also investigated. PT scheme is found to be least sensitive in correcting the daily SPPs compared to the other two schemes. However, careful consideration should be given for correcting the CMORPH and PERSIANN estimations.

scholarly journals Flood risk index pattern assessment: case study in Langat River Basin

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2S) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S.M. Saudi ◽  
M.K.A. Kamarudin ◽  
I.S.D. Ridzuan ◽  
R Ishak ◽  
A Azid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Langat River

Merging of satellite precipitation products: A quantile based Bayesian model averaging approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karisma Yumnam ◽  
Ravi Kumar Guntu ◽  
Ankit Agarwal ◽  
Maheswaran Rathinasamy
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Model ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
Linear Scaling ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
First Case ◽  
Local Intensity ◽  
Intensity Scaling

<p>A multitude number of satellite precipitation products developed as an alternative to ground-based measurements. However, these products suffer from considerable errors and uncertainties due to their retrieval algorithms and sensor capabilities. The uncertainties vary from region to region depending on the topography and also with the rainfall intensities. This study evaluated the accuracy of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM3B42), Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks - Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR), Climate Prediction Center morphing method (CMORPH), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5th Generation (ERA5) during the monsoon season over the coastal Vamsadhara river basin in India. We have also developed a quantile based Bayesian model averaging (QBMA) to merge these products. QBMA is compared with traditional methods, namely, simple model averaging and one outlier removed. Two cases of merging, each with three sub-cases, were experimented: In the first case, we combined various for of TRMM (Linear Scaling bias-corrected, Local Intensity Scaling bias-corrected) PERSIANN and CMORPH. In the second case we had various combination of IMERG (Linear Scaling bias-corrected, Local Intensity Scaling bias-corrected), CHIRPS and ERA5. In all the cases, the coefficients were calibrated using 2001 to 2013 daily monsoon rainfall data and validated for 2014 to 2018. The results indicate that linear scaling bias-corrected QBMA  outperformed the other methods in the first case. For the second case, the one outlier removed method performed better in terms of the correlation coefficient. However, the relative root mean square error is lowest for linear scaling bias-corrected QBMA. The second case outperformed the first case. Our results imply that the improvement of accuracy depends on the method and products used in merging.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document